Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010647
Original file (20150010647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  28 July 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150010647 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.
4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there be no change of the applicant’s disability and separation determination. 

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in
diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES).  The evidence of the available records shows the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) diagnosis of adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood and Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnoses of anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were rendered during the DES process.  The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) did eliminate the diagnosis rendered by the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examiner, but adjustment disorder with anxiety (MH) condition was not compensable and not deemed to constitute a physical disability in accordance with (IAW) Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1332.38.  The SRP agreed there were no inappropriate changes in diagnoses and determined that the MH diagnoses were not changed to the applicant’s possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation.  Therefore the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP agreed that evidence of the record reflected MH related symptoms prior to enlistment in the Army.  The applicant had reported several childhood psychiatric diagnoses, most consistently ADHD.  He also had anxiety which led him to play with fire to relieve stress.  He was hospitalized twice during his adolescent years prior to enlisting in the Army and had received psychiatric medications and counseling.  The applicant himself noted that his psychiatric issues had never interfered with his duties as a Soldier.  During his years in the Army, he was never hospitalized psychiatrically, and there was no history of domestic violence.  The record showed no evidence of an Article 15 or of other infractions.  There was no clinical evidence that his condition caused significant impairment in social or occupational functioning.  The last MH note prior to separation indicated he was in school, was with his fiancée, and optimistic about his future plans.  The commander’s statement did not implicate a MH condition.
Additionally, a MH condition was never profiled. 

4.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient evidence that any MH condition rose to the level of being unfitting at the time of separation and none were subject to a service disability rating.
5.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20150010647



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010671

    Original file (20140010671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP carefully considered all available evidence The applicant's MH diagnosis was changed during the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) process, but none of the changes in diagnoses were to the applicant's possible disadvantage. The July 2011 examination...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010919

    Original file (20140010919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. The evidence did not support a change in the diagnosis.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014906

    Original file (20140014906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of an MH diagnosis or diagnoses being changed or eliminated to the applicant's possible disadvantage during the Disability Evaluation Process (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011234

    Original file (20140011234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001264

    Original file (20140001264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP indicated that regardless of the final physical evaluation board (PEB) diagnosis, Section 4.129 did not specify a diagnosis of PTSD, rather it stated "mental disorder due to a highly stressful event" and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009065

    Original file (20140009065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010846

    Original file (20140010846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the pilot Disability Evaluation System (DES).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150013425

    Original file (20150013425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the condition during processing through the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). The evidence from the available records show the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) diagnosis of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000346

    Original file (20150000346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Integrated Disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010489

    Original file (20150010489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System...