Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013780
Original file (20140013780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:  12 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140013780


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, approval of an exception to policy to transfer the FSM's unused education benefits to his dependent under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM would like to transfer his unused education benefits to his daughter.

3.  The applicant provides a signed and notarized general power of attorney and a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), dated 31 July 2014.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 
Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 5 July 1983, the FSM enlisted in the Regular Army.  He held military occupational specialty (MOS) 19K (M1 Armor Crewman) and attained the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5.

3.  On 31 July 2003, the FSM was retired after completing 20 years and 26 days of net active service.  On 1 August 2003, the FSM was placed on the Retired List.

4.  On 22 June 2009, Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for the eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 (emphasis added) who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

5.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy which identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.  The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends the FSM should be granted an exception to policy to transfer his unused education benefits under the provision of the TEB.

2.  Her contention is without merit because regardless of the underlying reason for her request, the evidence of record shows the FSM retired from active duty on 31 July 2003.  Accordingly, he was not on active duty or in an active status as a member of the Selected Reserve on 1 August 2009.

3.  The law requires a member to be in an active status at the time he/she requests the transfer.  Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty was prior to 31 July 2009 and they would have transferred to the Retired List prior to 1 August 2009.

4.  In view of the foregoing, by law he is not eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the TEB provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110007920



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013780



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016484

    Original file (20130016484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he transferred his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his children prior to his retirement. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of the FSM's record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. In the absence of evidence indicating the FSM was unfairly deprived of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019598

    Original file (20140019598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After applying for retirement after 20 years of active service in early 2009, he received an approved retirement date of 1 September 2009, during which time the Post-9/11 GI Bill was being launched. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001374

    Original file (20120001374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his son prior to retirement under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide AD participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying AD service individual pre-separation or release from AD counseling on the benefits under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021656

    Original file (20110021656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his educational benefits to eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005370

    Original file (20130005370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016063

    Original file (20100016063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252, dated 30 June 2008, authorized the Post-9/11 GI Bill effective 1 August 2009. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014582

    Original file (20110014582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he retired from active duty on 31 October 2009 and he was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the TEB provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill because he had an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, with no additional service required. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 1988 and he was honorably retired on 31 October 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007399

    Original file (20140007399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of education benefits to his spouse under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The respective dependent must then submit an application for VA educational benefits, VA Form 22-1990e, to request to use the benefits. The FSM was eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no evidence he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020978

    Original file (20120020978.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOD policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019129

    Original file (20110019129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, but she was not eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children because the law requires the Soldier to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by...