Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012894
Original file (20140012894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140012894 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his period of honorable service.  

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  His DD Form 214 does not show he had a period of honorable service.  
   
   b.  He reenlisted on 12 January 1982 and his previous enlistment from 
20 February 1979 through 11 January 1982 was an honorable discharge.  At that time, there was a rule that came out that only one DD Form 214 will be made for all enlistments.  Unfortunately, his DD Form 214 does not show his previous honorable discharge.

	c.  He needs to have his honorable service reflected in order for him to receive Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his OSA Form 172 (Case Report and Directive). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 20 February 1979, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA).  He completed initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman).  

3.  On 11 January 1982, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment in the RA.

4.  On 12 January 1982, he reenlisted in the RA.

5.  During the applicant's second enlistment, he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) twice and multiple counseling documents.  He was recommended for separation due to a pattern of misconduct.  The recommendation was approved and on 20 March 1984, he was discharged.  

6.  His DD Form 214, ending on 20 March 1984, shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14 for misconduct.  His DD Form 214 shows in item 18 (Remarks), the entry, "Immediate reenlistments this period: 790220-820111; 820112-860111."

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect during the applicant's period of service, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army and was the governing regulation applicable to the applicant's issues concerning the proper notation of his prior honorable service on his DD Form 214.  Paragraph 1-4b (5) stated that a DD Form 214 would not be prepared for enlisted Soldiers who were discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.

8.  Army Regulation 635-8 (Separation Processing and Documents) replaced Army Regulation 635-5.  This regulation prescribes Department of the Army policy and procedural guidance relating to transition management and preparation of separation documents.  Paragraph 5-6r states that item 18 of the DD Form 214 documents the mandatory remarks that are pertinent to the proper accounting of the separating Soldier's period of service.
   a.  It states for enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by the DD Form 214, enter "Immediate Reenlistments This Period" and specify the appropriate dates.  
   
   b.  For Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and who are later separated with any characterization of service except honorable, enter "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (the first day of service for which a DD Form 214 was not issued) until (date before commencement of current enlistment)."
   
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant served honorably from 20 February 1979 to 11 January 1982.  This honorable service was not noted on his DD Form 214.  As later required by regulation, it would be appropriate to annotate the applicant's period of honorable service in item 18 of his DD Form 214.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 ending on 20 March 1984 should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 18 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Continuous honorable active service from 20 February 1979 until 11 January 1982."  


      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006406



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140012894



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010045

    Original file (20130010045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 29 April 1985, to reflect the entry date of 8 January 1976. Item 12b of his 1985 DD Form 214 has an entry date of 2 August 1979 and it should be 9 March 1976. The applicant provides: * 1976 DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement – Armed Forces of the United States) (3 pages) * 1978 DD Form 4 (1 page) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014286

    Original file (20110014286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from active Duty) to show: * Completion of 8 years and 4 months of military service * All his military schools and awards * He entered active duty at Fort Jackson, SC, vice Fort Ord, CA * He received two honorable discharges 2. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a result of court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012316

    Original file (20120012316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show something other than unsatisfactory performance. On 19 June 1984, the applicant was notified by his immediate commander that discharge action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 13-2, for unsatisfactory performance. His narrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022704

    Original file (20120022704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, he be issued a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period 11 May 1979 to 28 January 1982 and his character of service be shown as honorable. He should have another DD Form 214 showing an honorable discharge. Although the applicant contends he was discharged for 24 hours from the Army before reenlisting, evidence shows he was honorably discharged on 28 January 1982 and he reenlisted on 29 January 1982.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008505

    Original file (20080008505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 29 April 1979 shows he entered active duty on 9 March 1977. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019756

    Original file (20100019756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she entered active duty on 11 May 1976 instead of 25 November 1981. Her records do not contain a DD Form 214 for this period of service. Her records do not contain a DD Form 214 for this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014384

    Original file (20140014384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he completed an honorable period of service in the infantry while stationed in Korea under combat conditions. Orders 155-77 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Dix, NJ, on 4 June 1986, reducing him from SP4/E-4 to private/E-1 on 27 May 1986 and reassigning him to the U.S. Army Transition Point, Fort Dix, for the purpose of out-processing, and subsequent discharge from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009051

    Original file (20120009051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1992 correctly shows the number of AAMs he is entitled to. With respect to additional awards of the ARCOM, evidence of record shows orders awarded him two awards of the ARCOM and his DD Form 214 shows these awards. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * adding to additional awards of the AAM, ARCOM, and his appreciation and service certificates to his DD Form 214 * adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018129

    Original file (20100018129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she entered active duty on 11 September 1979 instead of 8 June 1984. The applicant provides a DD Form 214. She completed 4 years, 8 months, and 27 days of creditable active military service during this period of initial enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008682

    Original file (20120008682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With regard to Items 4a and 4b on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 March 1983, the evidence of record shows he was reduced to PV1/E-1 on 22 February 1983 as a result of the discharge action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14. This award is currently shown on his 1983 DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 5 of the applicant's 1983 DD Form 214 to show his...