Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012470
Original file (20140012470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140012470 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 January 1991 to show: 

* he was not discharged by reason of a Bar to Reenlistment
* he was retired vice honorably discharged

2.  The applicant states he deserves to be retired.  His prior commander got mad at him because he (the applicant) was following the standing operating procedure.  The commander's friend wanted to eat in the dining facility without the proper paperwork and he would not allow him permission to enter the dining facility.  The lieutenant colonel got mad and that is the reason for the Bar to Reenlistment.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having had prior active service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 20 June 1977.  He served through several reenlistments and/or extensions and he was promoted to the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 on 1 November 1983.  

3.  On 15 December 1989, the Department of the Army (DA) imposed a Bar to Reenlistment against him under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP) wherein it stated, in pertinent part, that after a comprehensive review of the applicant's records it was determined that he was to be barred from reenlistment.

4.  He was honorably discharged from active duty on 7 July 1991.  He completed 13 years, 6 months, and 18 days of creditable active service during this period of service and had a total of 16 years, 5 months, and 1 day of creditable active service.

5.  The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows the following entries in:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) - that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), paragraph 16-5a
* item 26 (Separation Code) - "KBF"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) - "DA Imposed Bar to Reenlistment"

6.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5a, in effect at the time, stated, in pertinent part, that Soldiers may be separated prior to expiration of term of service.  When authorization limitations, strength restrictions, or budgetary constraints required the size of the enlisted force to be reduced, the Secretary of the Army would authorize voluntary or involuntary separation for the convenience of the Government, of RA noncommissioned officers (NCOs) and U.S. Army Reserve NCOs serving in an Active Guard Reserve status, under the QMP.  The QMP is designed to (1) enhance the quality of the career enlisted force, (2) selectively retain the best qualified Soldiers, (3) deny continued service to nonproductive Soldiers, and (4) encourage Soldiers to maintain their eligibility for further service.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty.  The SPD code of KBF is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5a and "DA Imposed Bar to Reenlistment" is the corresponding entry for the narrative reason for separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms a DA Bar to Reenlistment was imposed against the applicant under the QMP and he was discharged on 7 January 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5a, with an SPD of KBF.  His narrative reason for separation was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph
16-5a.  This is the only valid narrative reason for separation permitted under that paragraph and is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.  As the applicant did not have 20 years of active duty service, he was not entitled to be retired and was appropriately discharged.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140012470





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140012470



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016695

    Original file (20080016695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, amendment to Item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5a, in effect at the time, specified that a Soldier denied reenlistment could be voluntarily separated before the expiration of their term of service due to a HQDA imposed bar to reenlistment. The evidence shows the applicant was locally barred from reenlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009815

    Original file (20100009815.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides through his Senate representative: * a self-authored letter, dated 3 January 2010 * a letter addressed to him regarding a potentially negative efficiency report for the period 8806-8902, dated 1 December 1989 * U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC), Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN, memorandum, subject: DA-Imposed Bar to Reenlistment Under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP), dated 15 December 1989 * his company commander's letter of recommendation for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609758C070209

    Original file (9609758C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was given a separation code of “KGH, and a reentry code of “3.” He had completed a total of 9 years, 1 month, and 26 days active military service, and 2 years, 8 months, and 21 days inactive military service. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment. Based on the applicant’s selection of Option 2 when he was notified of the DA bar to reenlistment, he should have been involuntarily discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024512

    Original file (20100024512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he is entitled to severance pay. The applicant's EER for the period June 1988 through July 1989, dated 14 August 1989, shows that in March 1989 the applicant passed the APFT and met weight standards. He was properly separated for the DA-imposed bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026085

    Original file (20100026085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a reentry (RE) code of "1" vice "4" and a corresponding separation program designator (SPD) code. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), paragraph 16-8, in effect at the time, states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers may be separated prior to expiration of term of service. The SPD code of "JCC" is the correct code for Soldiers discharged under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006654

    Original file (20070006654.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 October 1992, the applicant was discharged under the provision of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 by reason of “Reduction in Authorized Strength – Qualitative Early Transition Program.” He was assigned a separation code of JCC and a reenlistment eligibility code of RE-4. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. He was barred from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021404

    Original file (20130021404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * DA Form 2-1 * DA Form 2166-7 (NCOER) * DA Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * Active Duty Retention Based on Duty Performance memorandum * Three QMP Appeal memoranda * Appeal to DA Bar to Reenlistment memorandum * Orders 024-00255 * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A memorandum from the U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC), Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN, dated 5 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028931

    Original file (20100028931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) paragraph 10-5 governs screening procedures and states, in pertinent part, that appropriate Department of the Army Selection Boards will review the performance portion of the OMPF, the DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record Part-I) and DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record Part-II), and other authorized documents. The general considered the applicant’s response and the recommendations of his chain of command and elected to file the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002148

    Original file (20110002148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further allowed Soldiers who perceived that they will be unable to overcome a Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) bar to reenlistment to be discharged upon their request and stated that these Soldiers could request discharge at any time after receipt of the HQDA bar to reenlistment from unit commanders or upon notification that an appeal of the bar to reenlistment was disapproved. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time establishes that RE-2B will normally be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054833C070420

    Original file (2001054833C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, the records fail to show that he ever submitted an appeal to the bar to reenlistment under the QMP. He was not authorized separation pay because he was not serving on active duty on 5 November 1990.