Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011782
Original file (20140011782 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011782 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.

2.  The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD section 4.130. 

3.  The SRP noted that the VA examiner diagnosed somatoform disorder and a mood disorder.  The Medical Evaluation Board and PEB adjudicated undifferentiated somatoform disorder and a single episode of major depressive disorder.  The action officer opined that this represents a refinement of the diagnosis and that no change in the PEB diagnosis is warranted.  The SRP determined that this applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. 

4.  The SRP considered the appropriate rating in accordance with VASRD section 4.130.  The PEB adjudicated in accordance with the VA recommendation as part of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System process, a 70 percent disability rating.  The SRP agreed that the level of function in evidence at separation did not warrant a higher rating. 

5.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  



      ______________X___________
                  CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140011782



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011782

    Original file (20140011782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014262

    Original file (20140014262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should no change in the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the temporary disability and permanent retirement determination. The SRP noted the neurology medical evaluation board (MEB) recorded the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and that the neuropsychological evaluation had not recorded a diagnosis of PTSD and PTSD had not appeared in any other clinical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002286

    Original file (20140002286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's mental health (MH) condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP agreed that the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019104

    Original file (20140019104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the applicant’s separation rating of 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004123

    Original file (20150004123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The physical evaluation board (PEB) assigned a 70 percent rating (higher than the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010919

    Original file (20140010919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. The evidence did not support a change in the diagnosis.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010511

    Original file (20140010511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP’s charge with respect to MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001259

    Original file (20140001259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006925

    Original file (20140006925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy. The SRP also noted the VA carried a working diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and this was the diagnosis made by the VA Compensation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008940

    Original file (20140008940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable;...