Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011109
Original file (20140011109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011109 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, as an exception to policy, reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that he is submitting additional information and would greatly appreciate consideration by the Board.

3.  The applicant provides copies of three third-party statements and operation reports showing his unit was engaged in enemy operations during the period he was assigned to the unit.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110000824, on 5 July 2011.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 4 September 1968.  He completed his basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman at Fort Polk, Louisiana before being transferred to Vietnam on 30 January 1969 for assignment to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment.  He was assigned to multiple positions which included that of a rifleman, grenadier, machine gunner, and assistant machine gunner.

3.  He departed Vietnam on 29 January 1970 and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas.  On 12 March 1970, he verified that he had reviewed/audited his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

4.  On 3 September 1970, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-4.  He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Bronze Star Medal (for meritorious service), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, National Defense Service Medal, and his marksmanship badges.

5.  A review of the available records show the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam and there is no evidence showing he was awarded the CIB or that he personally engaged the enemy in active ground combat.

6.  The supporting third-party statements from members of his unit are dated 
28 September 2012, 10 October 2012, and 19 March 2013 and all of the statements have one thing in common.  They all attest to the fact that the applicant was a member of their unit during periods in which the unit engaged the enemy and that he should have been awarded the CIB.  However, none of the individuals attest to the fact that they witnessed the applicant engaging the enemy. 

7.  The operation reports provided by the applicant shows the applicant’s unit was involved in enemy engagements during the period of his assignment; however, they do not indicate the applicant was involved in an enemy engagement.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Announcement in orders is required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been carefully considered and appear to lack merit.  He had not provided evidence to show with any degree of certainty that anyone witnessed him engaging the enemy in combat.  Unfortunately, not all infantrymen serving in Vietnam were awarded the CIB and the applicant now comes to the Board more than 40 years after the fact requesting that the Board award him the CIB based solely on his presence in an infantry unit in Vietnam.

2.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim is not in doubt, the fact remains that the CIB is not a unit award.  It is an individual award to infantryman assigned to an infantry unit who actually engaged the enemy in combat.  The CIB is not issued to units but to individual infantryman based on their actual engagement in combat. 

3.  While there are instances in which large numbers of infantryman in an infantry unit are issued the CIB for their participation in ground combat with the enemy, the CIB has always remained an individual award that is based on individual actions in combat.  

4.  Unfortunately, there is no evidence to show that he was awarded the CIB or that he met all of the eligibility criteria for award of the CIB.  Therefore, absent evidence to show he actually engaged the enemy in combat there appears to be no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110000824, dated 5 July 2011.








2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
      
      
      
      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011109



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011109



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009896

    Original file (20100009896.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * orders confirming his unit of assignment in Vietnam * general orders announcing award of the ARCOM * a letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (AHRC) Military Awards Branch (MAB) denying his request for the CIB * six statements of support with attached DD Forms 214 from veterans who served with him in Vietnam CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023235

    Original file (20110023235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states that in order to qualify for the Combat Infantryman Badge a member must meet the following three requirements: be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participate in such ground combat. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000892

    Original file (20150000892.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; he must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and he must actively participate in such ground combat. His military service record is void of documentation that shows he actively participated in ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010715

    Original file (20080010715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070013172, on 4 March 2008. Additionally, World War II holders of the Combat Infantryman Badge received a monthly pay supplement known as combat infantry pay and holders of the Expert Infantryman Badge were entitled to expert infantry pay. While the sincerity of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009921

    Original file (20100009921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record the applicant served in active ground combat during his tour in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and as a result concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, there is no indication he was ever assigned to an infantry staff headquarters or to non-infantry duties during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, and given his unit regularly participated in combat operations and was cited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068631C070402

    Original file (2002068631C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record reflect award of the Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Bronze Star Medal, two awards of the Air Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation. The applicant is entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars (one for each campaign), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and the Expert Qualification Badge with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017017

    Original file (20080017017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review the Board determined that although the evidence of record confirmed the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned duties as a scout and senior scout observer with a qualifying infantry unit during his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), there was no evidence of record confirming his active participation in ground combat, and that there were no orders or other documents on file that indicated he had ever been recommended for or awarded the CIB. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001757

    Original file (20090001757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was never credited with his CIB on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed training and was awarded MOS 11B. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB; b. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the CIB, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004997

    Original file (20090004997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry military occupational specialty in an infantry unit, but also that he was personally present and participated with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010302

    Original file (20110010302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Based on Army Regulation 600-8-22, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge requires service in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy. The applicant's service record does not contain sufficient evidence that shows he was engaged in active ground combat with the enemy while assigned to his infantry unit in Vietnam.