Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001757
Original file (20090001757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001757 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was never credited with his CIB on his DD Form 214.  He thinks it was just overlooked or it was not printed on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 April 1969.  At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman).  His highest grade attained was specialist four, E-4.

3.  He was assigned to Vietnam on 23 September 1969 with Company A and further assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, as a rifleman in duty MOS 11B.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list the CIB in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records which show he was awarded the CIB.

5.  Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 13012, dated 21 July 1970, show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device for actions in the Republic of Vietnam.  The orders stated in part, "Specialist Four E____ distinguished himself by heroism in sustained combat operations against a hostile enemy force in the Republic of Vietnam from 28 May 1970 to 30 May 1970."

6.  The applicant departed Vietnam on 20 September 1970 and was credited with participation in the Vietnam Summer-Fall Campaign, the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 Campaign, the Sanctuary Counteroffensive Campaign, and the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII Campaign.

7.  The applicant was released from active duty on 23 April 1971.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of active military service with 1 day of lost time.

8.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, the Bronze Star Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Air Medal, two overseas service bars, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with two Rifle Bars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Second Class Gunner with Machine Gun Bar.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows that at the time of the applicant's assignment to 


the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, it was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award by Headquarters, Department of the Army, General Orders Number 43, dated 1972.

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army, General Orders Number 42, dated 1972.

11.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army, General Orders Number 11, dated 1973.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.  Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 also states that the term "smaller size" infantry unit is a unit of squad, platoon, or company size.  For example, personnel possessing an infantry MOS in a rifle squad or a cavalry platoon of an armored cavalry troop would be eligible for award of the CIB if other criteria are also met.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal, including the Vietnam Service Medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he was never credited with his CIB on his DD Form 214.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant completed training and was awarded MOS 11B.  He was assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, as a rifleman during his tour in Vietnam.  In addition, he was 


awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device for heroism involving combat operations against a hostile enemy force, which confirms he engaged in actual ground combat.  Therefore, he should be awarded the CIB and his DD Form 214 should be amended to show this badge.

3.  A review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, during a period it was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, these awards should be added to his DD Form 214.

5.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 currently reflects the Vietnam Service Medal.  However, he received credit for participation in four campaigns during the Vietnam War.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended to reflect four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the CIB;

	b.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and 

	c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the CIB, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam 


Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001757



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001757



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009623

    Original file (20130009623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry was cited for award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 21 February 1970 to 28 February 1971 in Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 42, dated 1972 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 17 September 1965 to June 1972 in DAGO 54, dated 1975 11. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005557

    Original file (20080005557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). No CIB orders are filed in the applicant’s records. The War Department received requests to award the CIB to non-infantry individuals and units employed as infantry during tactical emergencies.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003002

    Original file (20130003002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083875C070212

    Original file (2003083875C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His two awards of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device show that he actively participated in that ground combat. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge. That the applicant's DD Form 214 be amended to add the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster with "V" Device), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058023C070420

    Original file (2001058023C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record does not show that he was awarded any other ARCOM (with or without the “V” Device). The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart or the CIB. Furthermore, his Enlisted Qualification Record and the general orders awarding him the ARCOM with “V” Device show that he was an infantryman engaged in hostile action (at the time he was wounded) and as such met the prerequisites for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017867

    Original file (20080017867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also contends that his unit received a unit citation for action on 5 May 1969 in Vietnam. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001988

    Original file (20080001988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time when the applicant was separated, required that throughout a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal the enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. The evidence shows the applicant was assigned as an 11B Infantryman while assigned to Company E, 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division during the war in the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011714

    Original file (20100011714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB. This document shows that the 1st Battalion, 8th Calvary Regiment, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 59, dated 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015790

    Original file (20130015790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. General orders show the applicant was awarded the AM (2d award). _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002029

    Original file (20140002029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows his unit was awarded the PUC; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the CIB and correct his DD Form 214 to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 19 May 1969 through 14 October 1970 * deleting award of the VSM from his DD...