Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010915
Original file (20140010915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    30 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010915 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s disability and separation determination. 

2.  The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable; and whether a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD Section 4.130. 

3.  The SRP considered the criteria for diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM- IV TR) including: the evidence for the stressor (criterion A), re-experiencing of the event (criterion B), persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma (criterion C), hyperarousal (criterion D), duration and onset (criterion E), or the presence of clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important area of functioning (criterion F).

4.  The SRP first considered the diagnosis.  It noted that while the applicant was given a number of MH diagnoses, both the profile and the medical evaluation board (MEB) examination listed Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the MEB psychiatrist diagnosed generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) based on both an examination and review of the military records.  The SRP determined that a preponderance of evidence did not support a change in the diagnosis.  The MEB forwarded the MH diagnoses of GAD to the PEB for adjudication.  The PEB adjudicated the applicant for GAD.  Nonetheless, the diagnosis of PTSD was listed on both the DD Form 2808 and profile form.  The SRP determined that the MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process.  Therefore, the applicant did meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. 

5.  The SRP also considered if the applicant's MH diagnosis, regardless of description, was unfitting.  He was issued an S2 profile.  The MEB psychiatrist noted that the GAD met retention standards as did the MEB.  The PEB did not find the condition unfitting.  The applicant had a long-standing history of MH issues, but had apparently been able to function satisfactorily at work other than the disciplinary issues.  He was entered into the Disability Evaluation System (DES) process for the orthopedic issues and separated for the same.  

6.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that the evidence did not support the presence of an unfitting MH condition at time of the applicant's separation.

7.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      ___________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140010915



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000661

    Original file (20140000661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP Panel deliberated on the IPEB descriptors and determined that all the MH conditions were listed, although not separately rated in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018936

    Original file (20140018936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted that both the service and VA rendered the same MH diagnosis of GAD and agreed that there was not a preponderance of evidence to support an SRP recommendation for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03866

    Original file (BC 2014 03866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Apr 09, the IPEB adjudicated the applicant’s conditions as unfitting with a compensable rating of 10%, and recommended permanent retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The DoD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Special Review Panel (SRP) recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007338

    Original file (20150007338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the entirety of the record and concluded there was insufficient evidence to support the diagnoses of GAD or MDD and there was insufficient evidence to change the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013531

    Original file (20140013531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP acknowledged the GAD diagnosis, but there was insufficient evidence for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005863

    Original file (20150005863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013806

    Original file (20140013806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The MEB forwarded the applicant's MH diagnoses of adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood to the PEB for adjudication. The SRP determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003882

    Original file (20150003882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommended no change to the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the permanent retirement rating of 30 percent for the unfitting mental health condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). The SRP noted that the PEB assigned a disability rating of 30 percent without application of VASRD Section 4.129 (Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007560

    Original file (20140007560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes or elimination of diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES) and found none. The SRP noted that the Veterans Affairs compensation and pension examiner...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008679

    Original file (20150008679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System. The SRP agreed that Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting anxiety disorder NOS was supported...