Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010611
Original file (20140010611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  24 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010611 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to honorable.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was told his discharge would be upgraded after 1 year if he kept a good record
* he has medical treatment records supporting a disability
* he was absent without leave (AWOL) because members of his platoon wanted him and another Soldier to kill Sergeant F____ and he had a nervous breakdown
* he was given the option to break the law or be killed
* he was asked to deliver drugs for Sergeant F____ and refused to do so
* he was then charged with disobeying a lawful order given by Sergeant F____ to serve as a paperwork runner
* that was the first time he ever saw drugs such as cocaine, heroin, acid (hallucinogens), uppers (stimulants), and downers (sedatives)

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 March 1981.

3.  On 11 March 1982, he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for disobeying a lawful order to deliver an ammunition request form to the ammunition supply point on 11 March 1982.

4.  The applicant was AWOL from 12 March 1982 through 14 March 1982 when he returned to his unit at Fort Bragg, NC.  He was again AWOL from 9 June 1982 until on or about 4 April 1983 when he was returned to military control at the U.S. Army Personnel Control Facility, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Dix, Fort Dix, NJ.

5.  Charges were preferred against him on 5 April 1983 for being AWOL from his unit from on or about 9 June 1982 until on or about 4 April 1983.

6.  On 6 April 1983, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10.  He consulted with counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the UCMJ, the possible effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions, and the procedures and rights available to him.  He acknowledged that he was guilty of the charge against him.  He did not submit statements in his own behalf.

7.  On 21 April 1983, the separation authority approved his request for discharge and directed his reduction to private/E-1 and the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions.

8.  On 13 May 1983, he was discharged accordingly.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he completed 1 year, 4 months, and 4 days of total creditable active military service with 302 days of lost time due to being AWOL.

9.  There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a review of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

10.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence supporting his contention that any disciplinary action taken against him, including his discharge, was the result of his refusal to follow unlawful orders involving narcotics or the result of a documented disability from which he suffers.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	  a.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to honorable was carefully considered; however, the evidence is insufficient to support his request.

2.  His records show he received NJP for disobeying a lawful order and he was AWOL on two occasions totaling 302 days, an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge.  He voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, to avoid trial by court-martial that may have resulted in a felony conviction.

3.  He consulted with counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial and the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the UCMJ.  Subsequent to receiving legal counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

4.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Further, his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.

5.  Although he stated he was ordered to participate in illegal acts and had a nervous breakdown resulting in his AWOL status, there is no evidence in his records and he provided no evidence to support this contention.

6.  Based on his record of indiscipline, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  Therefore, he is not entitled to an honorable or a general discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010611



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010611



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007937

    Original file (20090007937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 26 May 1982, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that a discharge under other than honorable conditions be issued to him and that the applicant be reduced to pay grade E-1. The applicant was discharged on 30 June 1982 in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051441C070420

    Original file (2001051441C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At this late date the Board will not second-guess the commander’s decision not to grant the applicant 45 days leave or to change the start date of his leave. While the Board takes cognizance of the applicant’s stated personal problems, this factor does not warrant the relief requested and it would not be appropriate to change the records to show that the applicant was discharged honorably from the reenlistment commencing on 14 January 1982. That all of the Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014227

    Original file (20140014227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his under than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. Although an honorable or general discharge was authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally issued to an individual who was discharged for the good of the service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087826C070212

    Original file (2003087826C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDARSUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDEDTYPE OF DISCHARGE(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)DATE OF DISCHARGEDISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR DISCHARGE REASONBOARD DECISION(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)REVIEW AUTHORITYISSUES 1.2.3.4.5.6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008105

    Original file (20140008105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 October 1982, his commander recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service and that he be given a UOTHC discharge. Although an honorable or general discharge was authorized, a UOTHC discharge was normally considered appropriate. The evidence does not support his request that his discharge should be upgraded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100004485

    Original file (20100004485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service -in lieu of trial by court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 9 January 1991, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records denied his petition for an upgrade because he had not submitted his application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009218

    Original file (20140009218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she entered active duty this period on 5 October 1982 and was discharged on 3 November 1992 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was an outstanding Soldier for nearly 9 years prior to the event that led to her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056989C070420

    Original file (2001056989C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058690C070421

    Original file (2001058690C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023300

    Original file (20100023300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request for discharge on 25 March 1983 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records to show he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.