| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was abused by the military at Fort Polk, Louisiana for reasons he does not understand and had a nervous breakdown shortly after entering the service, which he believes led to his misconduct. He goes on to state that he underwent 17 to 20 shock treatments from March 1981 to September 1982 at a hospital in Florissant, Missouri and was under a doctor’s care for 3 years (1981 to 1983).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in St. Louis, Missouri on 15 April 1980 for a period of 3 years and training as an infantryman. He successfully completed his training at Fort Benning, Georgia and was transferred to Fort Polk on 21 July 1980, for duty as a grenadier.
On 28 August 1980, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 11 August to 12 August 1980. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay (suspended for 90 days), restriction and extra duty. The suspended punishment was subsequently vacated.
The applicant went AWOL again on 14 October and he remained absent until he was apprehended by civil authorities in Arkansas on 19 October 1980 and was returned to military control.
The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s administrative discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation (DD Form 214) which shows that on 2 December 1980 he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 7 months and 4 days of total active service and had 14 days of lost time due to AWOL.
A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was being treated for any type of nervous disorder. The records show that he was treated for minor ailments (tendonitis, backache, etc).
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Such a request is strictly voluntary on the part of the person who has been charged and they must indicate that they have been briefed on the consequences of accepting a discharge under other than honorable conditions and must also indicate that they have not been coerced by anyone to request such a discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate and there are no provisions for an automatic upgrade of such a discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, it must be presumed that the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. A request for discharge under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial requires a voluntary request on the part of the individual concerned. Therefore, it appears that he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date.
4. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board; however, they are not supported by the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record. Accordingly, they are not sufficiently mitigating when compared to his otherwise undistinguished record of service during a relatively short period.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rtd____ ____js __ __dh ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001056989 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/08/28 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1980/12/02 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068671C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 20 October 1980, the separation authority directed that the applicant be reduced to pay grade E-1 and separated with a UOTHC discharge. The applicant expressed that he was experiencing personal problems after he returned from being AWOL, however, there is no evidence that he sought assistance through his chain of command prior to going AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053202C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030411
On 25 February 1974, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. On 4 March 1974, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed the issuance of an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008331
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. On 20 January 1981, the separation authority, a major general, approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and reduction to private (PV1)/E-1. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059779C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The request was approved and the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions from the OKARNG on 23 October 1979, the same date he was ordered to active duty at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 23 October 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078744C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: A review of the applicant’s service medical records does not reveal any complaints of or treatment for any type of mental, psychiatric or psychological conditions while on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010611
In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other honorable conditions. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026048
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or of a lesser-included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and he or she must indicate he or she has been briefed and understands the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge he or she might receive. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006645
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He also signed a separate Medical Examination for Separation Statement of Option, indicating he did not desire a separation medical examination. Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations, chapter 1, section 3.13(c), provides that, Despite the fact that no unconditional discharge may have been issued, a person shall be considered to have been unconditionally discharged or released from active military service when the following...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071340C070402
The Board considered the following evidence: On 17 January 1979, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a discharge UOTHC. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsCASE IDAR2002071340SUFFIXRECONYYYYMMDDDATE BOARDED2002/09/12TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UOTHC)DATE OF DISCHARGE1979/01/17DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200, chp10.