Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010603
Original file (20140010603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  19 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010603 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was retired in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states after she was injured in Iraq, she was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).  She went through her medical evaluations and she was discharged due to her disabilities in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* Certificate of Retirement
* a letter
* Orders D063-37
* Orders 271-830
* Orders 306-807
* page 2 of two DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award)
* a citation
* Meritorious Service Medal Certificate
* Arkansas Distinguished Service Medal Certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Arkansas Army National Guard on 15 March 1982.

3.  On 13 April 2007, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened and considered the applicant's disability of post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic low back pain.  The PEB found that the applicant's medical and physical impairment prevented the reasonable performance of duties required by her grade and military specialty.  The PEB further recommended the applicant be placed on the TDRL with a combined rating of 40 percent. 

4.  Orders 114-809, issued by the Military Department of Arkansas, Office of the Adjutant General, dated 24 April 2007, promoted the applicant from the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 to SSG/E-6 with an effective date and date of rank of         13 April 2007.

5.  Orders D229-08, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 16 August 2007, released the applicant from duty because of physical disability and placed her on the TDRL on 21 September 2007 in the rank/grade of          SGT/E-5 with a 40 percent combined disability rating.

6.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), effective 21 September 2007, shows the applicant was honorably separated from service due to being medically unfit for retention.  This form shows her rank/grade as SSG/E-6 and her date of rank as 13 April 2007. 

7.  Orders D063-37, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, dated         4 March 2010, removed the applicant from the TDRL and permanently retired her in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 effective 4 March 2010 with a 60 percent combined disability rating.

8.  During the processing of this case, on 28 January 2015, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Deputy, Personnel Policy Branch, NGB.  The advisory official states:

   a.  The ARNG Information Guide on Non-Regular Retirement, dated 15 April 2009, states Soldiers will retire in the grade held on the day before, or the date of, their retirements unless they are entitled to higher grades by law.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay) describes this process.
   
   b.  The NGB Retirements Branch concurs with this recommendation to correct her retirement rank/grade from SGT/E-5 to SSG/E-6 and authorize all back pay and allowances based on the correct effective date of rank.  

9.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, specifies any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following:  (1) the grade in which he is serving on the date when his or her name was placed on the TDRL or on the date when retired, or (2) the highest temporary grade in which he or she served satisfactorily, (3) the permanent regular grade to which he or she would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he or she is retired, (4) the temporary grade to which he or she would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he or she is retired.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that in April 2007 it was determined the applicant's medical condition prevented satisfactory performance of duty in her grade and specialty.

2.  Orders 114-809, issued by the Military Department of Arkansas, Office of the Adjutant General, dated 24 April 2007, promoted the applicant from the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 to SSG/E-6 with an effective date and date of rank of         13 April 2007.

3.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her record to show she was promoted to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 with a date of rank and effective date of 13 April 2007, and she should receive all back pay and allowances associated with the corrected effective date of rank.








BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders D229-08, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 16 August 2007, to show she was placed on the TDRL effective                 21 September 2007 in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 and providing her all back retired pay due as a result of this correction.




      ___________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010603





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010603



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004772

    Original file (20120004772.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. f. it took over two years for the medical board to reach a conclusion to place her on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL). The evidence of record shows the applicant had been selected for promotion to SSG by the CY01 SSG, RC/AGR Promotion Board and was entitled to be retired in that grade on 10 May 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023060

    Original file (20110023060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 7 June 2009 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 27 August 2009 * Orders 261-1314, dated 18 September 2009 * DA Form 199, dated 29 April 2011 * Orders D126-06, dated 6 May 2011 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 currently shows he was retired due to temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009395

    Original file (20140009395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also confirms she held the rank and grade of SGT/E-5. The NGB Form 22 is a document that records a member's service in the ARNG. Lacking any evidence to show the applicant held the rank of SSG/E-6 at the time of her retirement from active duty or to show she satisfactorily served in this rank during her enlistment, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014223

    Original file (20140014223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, specifies any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: (1) the grade in which he is serving on the date when his or her name was placed on the TDRL or on the date when retired, or (2) the highest temporary grade in which he or she served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016000

    Original file (20130016000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, states any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: a. the grade in which he/she is serving on the date when his/her name was placed on the TDRL or on the date when retired; b. the highest temporary grade in which he/she served satisfactorily; c. the permanent regular grade to which he/she would have been promoted had it not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023034

    Original file (20110023034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 311-0916, dated 7 November 2005, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Gordon, GA, retired her from active duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay effective 5 February 2006 and placed her on the TDRL in the rank of SGT effective 6 February 2006. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20c, states that under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015375

    Original file (20100015375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 31 March 2009, the South Carolina ARNG published Permanent Orders 090-001 releasing him from his active ARNG assignment effective 30 July 2009 and placing him on the State Retired List in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 31 July 2009. His retirement orders list his rank/grade as a SGT/E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending Orders 099-0903, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022143

    Original file (20130022143.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * upon her enlistment in the Regular Army (RA), her prior U.S. Marine Corps SGT date of rank (DOR) was not calculated as "20030301 minus 10 months" * upon reaching her unit, the 14th Engineer Battalion, she tried repeatedly to fix the error so she could attend the Warrior Leader Course (WLC) * she was unable to attend the WLC due to her DOR being 20070809 instead of 20040114 * she was told she was not senior enough [and] could not fix DJHS (unknown acronym) screen...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006284

    Original file (20130006284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was promoted and subsequently retired in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. He provides a memorandum, dated 14 November 2008, that indicates: * a promotion board convened on 14 November 2008 to review records and interview personnel for promotion to SGT and SSG * he was recommended for promotion to SSG in MOS 11B * the list of Soldiers recommended for promotion, including the applicant's name, be integrated into the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017008

    Original file (20140017008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. promotion to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 and b. correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 2002 to show her current legal name as N____ L____ A____. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence which shows she was on a promotion list for SSG at the time of her retirement for disability. The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the...