Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009395
Original file (20140009395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  13 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009395 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her record to show she retired for disability in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 vice sergeant
(SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states she served her country for 32 years, volunteered for two deployments, and was subsequently reduced in rank for misconduct.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 27 May 2011 and15 October 2007
* National Guard Bureau Certificate of Service

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant initially enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 28 September 1981 and continuously through multiple periods of reenlistment in that capacity, the Army National Guard (ARNG), and on active duty.  On 13 April 2007, while serving on active duty as a member of the USAR, she was promoted to SSG/E-6.

3.  On 17 October 2010, the applicant enlisted in the the Maine ARNG (MEARNG).  She held military occupational specialty 42A (Human Resource Specialist).

4.  On 9 June 2011, the applicant was notified that her company commander was considering whether she should be punished under Section 451-A of the Maine Code of Military Justice (MCMJ), for on or about 24 November 2009, presenting a false official document showing she passed the National Registry EMT-Basic Certification Examination and based on that document, deploying to Afghanistan as the senior medic with her unit.

5.  On 18 June 2011, the applicant elected not to demand a trial by court-martial and chose for the matter to be handled by her battalion commander at a closed hearing and to present matters in defense, mitigation, and/or extenuation.

6.  Having considered all matters presented in the closed hearing, the commander found her guilty of the charge and specification against her.  The punishment imposed consisted of a reduction to SGT and prohibition of promotion for one year.  The applicant did not appeal this punishment.

7.  Her OMPF contains Joint Forces Headquarters, MEARNG, Order Number 217-014, dated 5 August 2011.  It shows the applicant was reduced from 
SSG/E-6 to sergeant (SGT/E-5) on 28 July 2011.

8.  On 17 January 2014, the Chief, Operations Division, United States Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), notified the applicant the USAPDA found she had a disability and would be permanently retired with an 80 percent (%) disability rating.  On 3 March 2014, the applicant was honorably released from assignment and duty (REFRAD) accordingly.

9.  The NGB 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) issued the applicant upon her REFRAD show she completed a total of 32 years, 5 months, and 6 days of creditable military service.  It also confirms she held the rank and grade of SGT/E-5.
10.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) establishes standards, policies, and procedures for the management of the ARNG enlisted Soldiers in various functional areas.  It also provides guidance for completion of the NGB Form 22.  The NGB Form 22 is a document that records a member's service in the ARNG. 

* Items 5a and 5b show the rank/grade as recorded on the DA Form 2-1 (Enlisted Qualification Record) at the time of separation
* Item 6 shows the date of rank of the rank held at separation

11.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-regular Service) states, in pertinent part, that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service.  Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory if it is determined that any of the following factors exist:  revision to a lower grade was expressly for prejudice or cause, due to misconduct, or punishment pursuant to Article 15, UCMJ, or court-martial; or there is information in the Soldier’s service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (grade on retirement physical disability, members of the Armed Forces), states unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: 

* the grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the temporary disability retired list or, if his name was not carried on that list, on the date when he is retired
* the highest temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the armed force from which he is retired
* the permanent regular or Reserve grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired and which was found to exist as a result of a physical examination
* the temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired, if eligibility for that promotion was required to be based on cumulative years of service or years of service in grade and the disability was discovered as a result of a physical examination


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 13 April 2007.  However, the record also confirms and she admits she was reduced for misconduct on 28 July 2011, following her punishment pursuant to Section 451-A of the MCMJ.

2.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows she was promoted back to SSG subsequent to her reduction to SGT and prior to her placement on the retired list by reason of permanent disability.

3.  Lacking any evidence to show the applicant held the rank of SSG/E-6 at the time of her retirement from active duty or to show she satisfactorily served in this rank during her enlistment, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009395





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009395



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019167

    Original file (20120019167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain an NGB Form 22 showing he was honorably discharged from the MEARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 March 2008. Orders 322-17, U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 18 November 2010, show the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged from the service with severance pay due to permanent physical disability in the rank of SSG with a disability rating of 20 percent effective 1 September 2008. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010603

    Original file (20140010603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders D063-37, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 4 March 2010, removed the applicant from the TDRL and permanently retired her in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 effective 4 March 2010 with a 60 percent combined disability rating. The NGB Retirements Branch concurs with this recommendation to correct her retirement rank/grade from SGT/E-5 to SSG/E-6 and authorize all back pay and allowances based on the correct effective date of rank. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015388

    Original file (20140015388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * she was processed under the integrated disability system (IDES) and she was permanently retired in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 * the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) considered her case and denied her request to be retired in the rank/grade of MSG/E-8 * she was promoted to MSG/E-8 in 2001 and served satisfactorily in that rank/grade; she was also laterally appointed to first sergeant (1SG) * she was the first female 1SG assigned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005153

    Original file (20140005153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. On 7 February 2000, the TXARNG issued Orders 038-207, discharging him from the ARNG and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 31 December 1999. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders P03-942379, issued by HRC, dated 14 March 2011, to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009586

    Original file (20140009586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 30 March 2012, to show he retired for disability in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 vice sergeant (SGT)/E-5. On 20 August 2002, MIARNG published Orders 232-011 honorably discharging him from the ARNG in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 effective 1 August 2002 in accordance with National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) paragraph 8-26g(3)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007703

    Original file (20130007703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The Retired Activities Directorate will screen each retirement applicant’s record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service. Therefore, he was correctly placed on the Retired List in the rank and grade of PVT/E-1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013481

    Original file (20100013481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 September 2007, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, published Orders P09-791175 retiring the applicant and placing him on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of SGT/E-5 effective 23 July 2007, the date he turned age 60, in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 12 April 1971 and held that grade until his honorable discharge on 25 March 1974. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019837

    Original file (20130019837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show his retired rank and grade as staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. His DD Form 214 shows he held the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on the date of his separation and that he had been promoted to that grade on 30 July 1984. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve - Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-regular Service) implements statutory authorities governing granting retired pay to Soldiers and former Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001879

    Original file (20140001879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 December 1984, Headquarters, 731st Maintenance Battalion published Orders 36-1 promoting him to the rank of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 in military occupational specialty 94B (Cook), effective 15 December 1984. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states, in pertinent part, that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014223

    Original file (20140014223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, specifies any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: (1) the grade in which he is serving on the date when his or her name was placed on the TDRL or on the date when retired, or (2) the highest temporary grade in which he or she served...