IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 February 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140010412
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests:
a. correction of his record to show he reenlisted for and is qualified to receive repayment of his student loans under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP); and
b. to be absolved from repaying the SLRP payments which have already been paid to his lending institution.
2. The applicant states:
a. he has been paid two installments of the SLRP. He has been questioning the South Carolina Army National Guard (SCARNG) Education Office since 2010, for what he needs to do to receive the rest of his entitlement;
b. he deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) in 2009-2010. He was told by a member of the SCARNG Education Office that his original enlistment paperwork was obsolete and required him and his recruiter to submit sworn statements acknowledging they knew nothing about the obsolete form. He was also encouraged to specify that he was just signing and initialing where his recruiter told him to sign;
c. he was deemed 100 percent disabled upon his redeployment in 2010 and retained on Title 10. He has had several operations and was in the Warrior Transition Unit until he was medically discharged in June 2013. He is currently on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) awaiting a follow-up for post-traumatic stress disorder;
d. one of the driving forces that led him to reenlist at over 40 years of age was the promise of educational debt relief. He was in forbearance with his school loans for over two and a half years and had talked with them at length about letting him pay the bare minimum and be taken off forbearance. They agreed and he is now trying to make the payments; and
e. it is his wish not to have to repay the SLRP payments which have already been paid to his lending institution. As far as the remaining SLRP payments owed to him, if it is going to create as many problems as it has so far, he requests the government keep it. He further states it has been a nightmare for him and his wife who handles all his affairs. It would give him peace of mind knowing he is no longer indebted for something that was not his fault.
3. The applicant provides:
* 2 memoranda
* a letter
* 2 pay vouchers
* National Guard Bureau Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex L to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) SLRP Addendum Army National Guard of the United States)
* DD Form 4/1
* 2 DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* W-2 (Wage and Tax Statement) 2010
* Retirement/Promotion/Pension Request
* Privacy Act Statement
* DD Form 2656-5 (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate)
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel)
* ARNG Retirement Points History Statement
* Diploma
* Laurens County Health Department Certificate
* Orders 135-0016
* Orders A-08-022365A07
* Personnel Data
* Appendix B
* Orders 279-886
* 2 pages of electronic mail
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 25 March 1983. He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 31C (Radio Teletype Operator).
2. On 23 March 1990, the applicant was discharged from the ARNG and assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Standby).
3. Following a break in service, on 20 March 2008, the applicant enlisted in the ARNG for a period of 6 years.
4. The applicant provides and his record contains an NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E, signed by the applicant and a service representative on 20 March 2008 which shows the applicant acknowledged he:
* was a prior service applicant enlisting for a term of 6 years
* had one disbursed loan in the amount of $18,680.76 and that the total amount of repayment for qualifying loan(s) would not exceed $20,000.00
5. The applicant's NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E fails to indicate that he held the primary MOS for the position he was enlisting; however, the addendum shows an SLRP control number was assigned.
6. On 22 April 2014, the Deputy G-1, ARNG, Arlington, VA, denied the applicant's request for an exception to policy to retain the $20,000.00 SLRP. The State Incentive Manager was instructed to terminate the SLRP with recoupment effective the contract start date. The memorandum further states:
a. the applicant received payment above the amount authorized for the incentive which violates ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06;
b. the applicant was not Duty Military Occupational Specialty Qualified (DMOSQ) for the contracted incentive in violation of Department of Defense Instruction 1205.21, paragraph E8.1.1.3;
c. the applicant's contract/bonus addendum was obsolete in violation of ARNG SRIP 07-06;
d. the applicant's incentive addendum does not clearly annotate the critical MOS in the space provided which violates ARNG SRIP 07-06; and
e. the applicant enlisted in the SCARNG as a former prior service member. In accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 prior service members are required to hold the skill at the time of enlistment to qualify for the SLRP. The applicant did not hold the skill for which contracted; therefore, the request cannot be granted. In addition, the applicant was paid over the annual contracted amount in fiscal year 2010, when the State Incentive Manager paid interest in the amount of $355.77.
7. ARNG SRIP 07-06 established policy to administer ARNG incentives for the period effective 10 August 2007 through 31 March 2008. The purpose of the ARNG Incentive Program is to assist ARNG leadership and personnel managers in meeting the readiness requirements for the ARNG. Prior service applicants may enlist for a term of service not less than 6 years in order to establish SLRP eligibility provided they are MOSQ for the position for which enlisting.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions have been noted and his supporting evidence has been considered.
2. As a prior service member, the applicant contracted for a 6-year ARNG obligation. In accordance with DoDI 1205.21 and ARNG SRIP 07-06, prior service members are required to hold the skill at the time of enlistment to qualify for the SLRP. The applicant did not hold the skill for which contracted; therefore, the National Guard Bureau's (NGB) action to terminate the incentive with recoupment appears to be proper and he has not shown otherwise. There is neither an error nor an injustice in his case.
3. It is noted that a service representative may have erroneously confirmed that the applicant met the SLRP criteria, and it appears at least one SLRP payment was made on his behalf. Notwithstanding these errors, the record fully supports NGB's decision to terminate the applicant's SLRP incentive with recoupment. In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010412
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010412
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015501
The SIAC audited the applicant's records and discovered that he was not eligible to contract for or receive payment on the EAB and SLRP incentives he enlisted for on 7 November 2007. c. At the time of his enlistment, he also contracted for a $20,000.00 SLRP incentive. He was not eligible to receive SLRP benefits at the time he contracted because he was not MOS qualified.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019544
BOARD DATE: 21 May 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019544 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his entitlement to the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) and termination of recoupment action. He provides a sworn statement in which he contends: * he was an 11B for three years (11 March 2007 - 1 September 2010) * his reenlistment contract, dated 11 March 2007, is valid because he completed the 6-year term of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003320
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show an exception to policy (ETP) was approved allowing him to receive the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive. He provides a memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for SLRP (Applicant), dated 22 January 2014, that shows the Deputy G-1, ARNG, NGB, denied a request for an ETP allowing him to retain the SLRP incentive and directed the State Incentive Manager to terminate the incentive with recoupment effective on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009094
The applicant requests correction of his records to show entitlement to the $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that he contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the WYARNG on 15 April 2009 for a period of 6 years in MOS 68W and his enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The Deputy G1 stated that although MOS 68W could not be validated as an authorized critical skill, a review of the applicant's DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015239
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records by changing dates to show he is entitled to the $2,500.00 reenlistment bonus (REB) and $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in his enlistment contract. To receive the incentive, the applicant should have contracted for a term of service other than 3x5, 6x2, or 8x0 and have at least one qualifying loan. f. To be eligible for the $2,500.00, a properly-executed REB addendum is required at the time of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001792
This official stated: * the applicant completed an SLRP addendum for the $50,000.00 SLRP instead of the $20,000.00 SLRP * the SLRP was increased according to SAMR-HR memorandum, subject: Changes to Reserve SLRP, dated April 2008 * the applicant accepted the incentive offer made by the MNARNG in good faith and had otherwise fulfilled his obligations under the contract as of the date of the request * withholding payment of this incentive would be against equity and good conscience and contrary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015423
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show: a. qualification for military occupational specialty (MOS) 31D (Mobile Subscriber Equipment Transmission System Operator), which he received while serving in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG), qualified him for MOS 25Q (Multichannel Transmission Systems Operator-Maintainer), the MOS he enlisted for when he joined the South Carolina ARNG (SCARNG); and b. an exception to policy (ETP) was authorized allowing him to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001575
However, NGB Policy Number 07-04 was in violation of Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Program Procedures), paragraph E9.1.2.1 that requires a 6x2 enlistment. Even though an ETP has been approved, his military records still require a correction to indicate a 6x2 enlistment contract rather than a 3x5 contract. The applicant signed a 3x5 enlistment contract in the CAARNG on 11 January 2007.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010351
The applicant provides: * Memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for SLRP [Applicant], dated 8 March 2015 * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-5-R-E (SLRP Addendum - ARNG of the United States) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB stated he could file a claim with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) if he believed an error or injustice still existed. It appears the NVARNG requested...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009224
BOARD DATE: 28 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140009224 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 17 March 2009, the applicant (as a prior service applicant) enlisted for MOS 13D. Evidence shows the applicant voluntarily submitted an application to OCS and was subsequently appointed as a 2LT in the IAARNG in violation of his prior service enlistment contract.