Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001575
Original file (20130001575.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  12 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001575 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his enlistment contract in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) from a 3x5 (3 years in the Selected Reserve and 5 years in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)) to a 6x2 contract in order to retain his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) benefits.

2.  The applicant states he was first made aware that he was not eligible for the SLRP because he enlisted under a 3x5 option.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) Policy 07-04, subject:  Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Guidance for Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07), permitted non-prior service Soldiers to contract for 3x5. However, NGB Policy Number 07-04 was in violation of Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Program Procedures), paragraph E9.1.2.1 that requires a 6x2 enlistment.  He relied on his recruiter who relied on NGB policy.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States)
* NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex L to DD Form 4 (SLRP Addendum - ARNG))
* Extract of DODI 1205.21

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 11 January 2007 for a period of 8 years.  His DD Form 1966/3 (Record of Military Processing) shows in item 32 (Specific Option/Program Enlisted For) the entry:

* Assignment to the 223rd Military Intelligence Battalion
* 3x5 Enlistment Bonus
* SLRP
* ARNG Standard Training Option

3.  In connection with this enlistment, he completed an NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E.  He indicated the enlistment option he selected provides he would be a member of an ARNG unit for a period of 3 years and a member of the IRR or Inactive National Guard for the balance of his 8-year obligation unless he elected to remain with his ARNG unit or he is discharged from his enlistment agreement.  He also indicated he understood:

* he would undergo training for military occupational specialty (MOS)
27D (Paralegal Specialist) that is authorized for SLRP and that he would remain in the contracted MOS for the first 3 years of his contract
* he has 2 loans in the amount of $20,000.00 and that repayment of loans would not exceed $20,000.00
* he would be suspended from the SLRP eligibility if he accepted a commission as an officer or an appointment as a warrant officer

4.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 14 August 2007 and he completed the required training for MOS 27D.  He was released from ADT on 24 May 2008 to the control of his state.  

5.  On 22 April 2009, he was honorably discharged from the ARNG to accept appointment as a commissioned officer.  His NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he completed 2 years, 3 months, and 12 days of ARNG service.

6.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the CAARNG and he executed an oath of office on 23 April 2009.  He was promoted to first lieutenant on 23 October 2010.

7.  There is no indication he petitioned the CAARNG or the NGB regarding his entitlement to the SLRP.

8.  During the processing of this case, on 29 January 2013, an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB.  The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request.  He stated:

	a.  According to the ARNG Education, Incentives and Employment Division [Applicant] was offered a $20,000.00 SLRP incentive based on his initial enlistment contract, dated 11 January 2007.  However, ARNG SRIP Guidance for FY 2007, Policy Number 07-04 was written in violation of DODI 1205.21, paragraph E8.1.2.1., that required a 6x2 enlistment commitment.  SRIP Policy Number 07-04, paragraph 1(2) authorized an enlistment contract of 3x5.  For a non-prior enlistment, DODI 1205.21, E8.1.2, requires a 6-year contract; therefore, SRIP Policy Number7-04 was in violation of DODI 1205.21.

	b.  In September 2012, Enlisted Accessions Division at the Pentagon approved an Exception to Policy (ETP) to grant exceptions allowing the SLRP to be retained under the 3x5 non-prior service enlistment option.  However, an ETP has not been submitted by the CAARNG on the applicant's behalf.

	c.  The applicant accepted a 3x5 contract in accordance with Policy Number 07-04 in good faith not knowing it was in violation of the DODI.  He received an initial payment of $9,000.00 with $11,000.00 remaining.  Withholding payment of this incentive would be contrary to equity and good conscience and against the best interest of the Army and the Soldier.  Even though an ETP has been approved, his military records still require a correction to indicate a 6x2 enlistment contract rather than a 3x5 contract.

9.  On 30 January 2013, a copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

10.  DODI 1205.21 prescribes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for management of the Reserve Component incentive programs.  It states in Section 6.2 (Written Agreements), as a condition of the receipt of an incentive covered by this Instruction, each recipient shall be required to sign a written agreement stating that the member has been advised of and understands the conditions under which continued entitlement to unpaid incentive amounts shall be terminated and which advance payments may be recouped.  That agreement shall clearly specify the terms of the Reserve service commitment that authorizes the payment of the incentive to the member.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant signed a 3x5 enlistment contract in the CAARNG on 11 January 2007.  In connection with this contract, he signed an SLRP addendum that promised him payment under the SLRP.  He enlisted in good faith not knowing that he was in violation of DODI 1205.21.  According to his State, he received a payment of $9,000.00 with $11,000.00 remaining.

2.  Withholding payment of this incentive would be contrary to equity and good conscience and against the best interests of the Army.  As such, his records should be corrected to show he executed a 6x2 enlistment contract vice the initial 3x5 enlistment contract. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X_  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing he enlisted under a 6x2 contract (6 years in the Selected Reserve and 2 years in the Individual Ready Reserve), and

	b.  paying from Army National Guard funds any SLRP payments due as a result of this correction.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001575



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001575



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015239

    Original file (20130015239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records by changing dates to show he is entitled to the $2,500.00 reenlistment bonus (REB) and $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in his enlistment contract. To receive the incentive, the applicant should have contracted for a term of service other than 3x5, 6x2, or 8x0 and have at least one qualifying loan. f. To be eligible for the $2,500.00, a properly-executed REB addendum is required at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019544

    Original file (20130019544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 21 May 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019544 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his entitlement to the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) and termination of recoupment action. He provides a sworn statement in which he contends: * he was an 11B for three years (11 March 2007 - 1 September 2010) * his reenlistment contract, dated 11 March 2007, is valid because he completed the 6-year term of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001719

    Original file (20130001719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicated he understood: * he enlisted for a term of 3 years in an ARNG unit and 5 years in the IRR; he enlisted in MOS 25C that is authorized the SLRP and he would remain in the contracted MOS for the first 3 years of his contract * he has 2 loans in the amount of $18,000 and repayment of loans would not exceed $20,000 * he would be suspended from the SLRP eligibility if he were flagged (suspension of favorable personnel actions) for an adverse action (does not include Army Physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013240

    Original file (20130013240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * it is true he was not DMOSQ at the time of his extension * he was DMOSQ by 2 May 2007, well before his 12 July 2007 contract effective date * regarding acceptance of the AGR position, policy has since changed to allow a Soldier to retain incentives * he entered into a contract trusting he was eligible for the REB and SLRP * per the terms he had fully performed his end of the contract * he would not have agreed to the extension if not for the REB and SLRP 5. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017103

    Original file (20140017103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She formally requested an ETP from the State Incentive Manager on 1 October 2012, wherein she requested relief from, and termination of, the levied recoupment action in the amount of $20,428.45 that resulted from the termination of her incentive entitlements. (8) Furthermore, had she executed a written agreement the bonus would have been terminated in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), paragraph E3.l.8.2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015501

    Original file (20130015501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SIAC audited the applicant's records and discovered that he was not eligible to contract for or receive payment on the EAB and SLRP incentives he enlisted for on 7 November 2007. c. At the time of his enlistment, he also contracted for a $20,000.00 SLRP incentive. He was not eligible to receive SLRP benefits at the time he contracted because he was not MOS qualified.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000189

    Original file (20140000189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 28 April 2006 for a period of 8 years. The applicant's DFAS Form 702 (DFAS Leave and Earnings Statement) issued on 13 December 2013 lists an education benefits debt balance in the amount of $6,013.36. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the Army National Guard did not initiate any recoupment action taken against him for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010412

    Original file (20140010412.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides and his record contains an NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E, signed by the applicant and a service representative on 20 March 2008 which shows the applicant acknowledged he: * was a prior service applicant enlisting for a term of 6 years * had one disbursed loan in the amount of $18,680.76 and that the total amount of repayment for qualifying loan(s) would not exceed $20,000.00 5. The memorandum further states: a. the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010437

    Original file (20130010437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She contacted the Alabama State Incentives Manager and he informed her that NGB memorandum, NGB-EDU-09-058, dated 14 September 2009, subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits upon Acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position, allows service members to keep the SLRP for the initial or extended period. According to ARNG SRIP 06-06, the applicant's eligibility for SLRP terminated upon her acceptance of an AGR position. However, the applicant accepted her AGR position...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016824

    Original file (20140016824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provides: * NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) Addendum ARNG of the United States) * Applicant's Exception to Policy (ETP) Requests for the SLRP, dated 16 June 2011 and 6 January 2014 * Statement of support, dated 6 January 2014 * Numerous email CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Annex E to the applicant's enlistment contract, NPSEB Addendum, shows she was also entitled to a $20,000 bonus for a 6-year...