IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 March 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140010381
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests promotion to sergeant (SGT), E-5.
2. The applicant states he was on the automatic promotion list until October 2013 when he was removed because he did not have a current Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). The reason he did not have a current APFT or marksmanship qualification was because his physical profile prevented him from performing these tests. Furthermore, regulations state that a Soldier who is on the promotion list at the time of medical retirement is to be automatically advanced at the time of retirement.
3. The applicant provides copies of three Memoranda for Record, Record Fire Scorecard, an APFT Scorecard, two Physical Profiles, his Enlisted Record Brief, and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. With prior U.S. Air Force Reserve service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 July 2008, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic).
2. On 24 September 2009, an MOS/Medical Retention Board (MMRB) determined that the applicant should reclassify to a shortage or balanced MOS. He retrained into MOS 15P (Aviation Operations Specialist) in 2010. There is no documentation as to why the applicant went before the MMRB.
3. The applicant was advanced to specialist (SPC), E-4 on 1 December 2009.
4. On 21 May 2013 and again on 10 September 2013, the applicant received a permanent physical profile that precluded him from carrying or firing a fire arm and performing any of the APFT or alternate APFT activities. He was referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).
5. An MEB found the applicant suffering from 13 conditions and referred him to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).
6. On 11 March 2014, a PEB determined the applicant's major depressive disorder, diplopia secondary to 4th cranial nerve palsy, and lumbar degenerative disc disease were unfitting and granted him a 70% disability rating. It was also determined his other conditions did not impact the applicant's ability to perform his duties. His diagnosis of alcohol dependence is a condition not constituting a physical disability.
7. In a 10 March 2014 Memorandum for Record, the applicant's unit commander noted the applicant had not taken the APFT since 26 February 2013 due degenerative disc disease with lower back pain. He had been assigned to the Warrior Transition Team in August 2013, was in the disability evaluation system (DES), and had a permanent profile.
8. On 20 March 2014, the applicant's unit commander provided a memorandum stating the applicant had not taken a weapons qualification test since 20 February 2013 due to his placement on a permanent profile.
9. Also on 20 March 2014, the unit commander provided a memorandum stating the applicant had been removed from the Automatic Promotion Roster due his profile restrictions precluding him from being able to conduct a current APFT and weapons qualification test.
10. The applicant was medically retired on 20 May 2014 as a specialist (SPC), pay grade E-4.
11. A review of the Department of the Army (DA) promotion point cutoff scores for his MOS for October 2013 through May 2014 revealed that only Soldiers who were fully eligible for promotion with a minimum of 559-798 (range) promotion points were selected for promotion for the Active Army.
12. Military Personnel Message Number 05-272 (DA Directed Promotion List Integration To SGT Clarification To Current Policy As Well As Guidance For Promotions) provided that, due to a shortage of noncommissioned officers in pay grade E-5, the Army's semi-centralized promotion policy was changed to allow all eligible specialists and corporals (with 48 months in service and a year in grade) to be automatically integrated onto the recommended list provided they are otherwise eligible for recommended list. Then, if an MOS falls beneath 100-percent operating strength at the E-5 level and no other Soldiers with more points are available to promote, some Soldiers on the list will be automatically promoted. Soldiers placed on the promotion list without participating in a promotion board will automatically be given only the minimum of 350 points. Once cut-off scores have been determined for promotions, those meeting or exceeding cut-off scores by board appearance, and otherwise fully eligible, will be promoted first. If, after review, there is still a requirement for promotions, HRC will select that requirement from those Soldiers listed with 350 points and otherwise fully eligible. The by-name promotion list will include Soldiers, if needed, from the automatic recommended list integration in MOS based on date of rank and basic active service date.
13. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) prescribes the enlisted promotions and reductions function of the military personnel system. It provides the following:
a. Paragraph 1-20c states that, per the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade. Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the retired list.
b. Promotion to the grade of SGT is a semi-centralized promotion selection process. For consideration a Soldier must meet the following basic eligibility requirements:
(1) have 48 months time in service;
(2) have 12 months time in grade;
(3) not been denied integration by the commander; or
(4) is otherwise not ineligible.
c. Paragraph 3-28 states a Soldier will be immediately (emphasis added) removed from the recommended list under conditions including:
(1) Failure of record APFT.
(2) Is undergoing proceedings that may result in discharge.
(3) Soldiers processing medical evaluation will remain on the recommended list unless a medical board has determined the Soldier is no longer fit for duty.
d. Once the Soldier is removed the action is final.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's dates of placement on and removal from the promotion recommendation roster are not in the available evidence. His unit commander stated the applicant was removed from the promotion list because he was unable to participate in the APFT and weapons qualifications due to his physical profile.
2. Though it appears the applicant was automatically integrated onto a recommended list for promotion to SGT, there is no evidence he was integrated into a promotion selection list (identified for promotion). In fact, evidence shows during the period October 2013 through May 2014, the minimum cutoff score for his MOS (15P) was 559. He would have had 350 points. As such, there appears to be no basis for granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ___x____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ x_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010381
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010381
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992
The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002288
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG) with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 June 2011. The message states, in part, Brigade/Battalion S-1 and Unit HR Specialists will assist Soldiers with updating their personnel records through the electronic Military Personnel Office (eMILPO) system and update training records through the S3/G3 Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATTRS) Representative. His request did not warrant a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011270
The applicant states, in effect: * he is a wounded warrior, serving at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) * he appeared before the SSG promotion board on 2 August 2012 and was recommended for promotion by the board with a total of 365 points * his points were inaccurately calculated, as the promotions clerk erroneously omitted 19 months of deployment service, equaling 38 points, and an additional 54 points from across other categories * after the August 2012 SSG promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021671
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that in May 2000, while undergoing Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) processing she maintained her promotion standing list status by submitting awards, civilian, and military education documents. The evidence of record confirms the applicant did not have a current APFT score in May 2002 and her promotion point total was adjusted to 396 points.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013155
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on Retirement Physical Disability, Members of the Armed Forces), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the TDRL under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: * the grade or rank in which he is serving...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005180
The FLAG was cleared from his personnel record upon completion of the investigation but it appears a notation of the FLAG was retained in his training ATRRS records. The 20 October 2012 Promotion Point Worksheet shows the applicant completed his last APFT on 1 January 2012 with a score of 228 and was granted 37 promotion points for the APFT with a total of 475 promotion points. The reasons the applicant was not promoted was not his lack of attendance at the ALC but that he did not have a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001066
Soldiers flagged for adverse action will be reintegrated by the commander onto the recommended list if the case is closed favorably (provided otherwise qualified) without re-appearance before a promotion board. The applicant contends her record should be corrected to show she was promoted to the rank of SGT effective 1 April 2014 instead of 1 January 2015. The INSCOM IG's findings suggest the applicant's command failed to reintegrate her on the PSL as a result of incorrect information...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000141
The applicant states, in effect, he went before a promotion board for SGT on 2 May 2013. a. Paragraph 5a states "Soldiers may be eligible for a retroactive promotion under the Administrative Records Corrections (ARC) process if he/he would have made the DA promotion point cutoff score, but was in a suspension of favorable action status and he/he was exonerated, the case was closed favorably, or a FLAG for adverse action was removed, provided the Soldier was otherwise qualified." While...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010818
The applicant states she was promotable at the time she was medically retired; therefore, she should have been retired as a SGT vice SPC. The applicant provides: * her DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 November 2008 * her Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 13 August 2008 * Orders Number D240-10, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) on 28 August 2013 * a memorandum from the USAPDA, dated 28 August 2013 * her Medical Protection System (MEDPROS)-Individual Medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012279
He provided a memorandum from the 191st CSSB, dated 27 December 2012, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and SSG, recommending the applicant for promotion to SGT. HRC memorandum for U.S. Army Promotion Work Centers, dated 22 February 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 March 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues, announcing promotion point cutoff scores for 1 March 2013. a. He provided a copy of his email to HRC, dated 3 June 2013,...