Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009571
Original file (20140009571 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009571 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that he served in Vietnam from 1967 to 1968 and was stationed at the Military Assistance Command – Vietnam (MACV) compound in the city of Hue during the TET Offensive of 1968 which was under attack for 26 days.  At the end of the 26th day, the only area held by friendly forces was the MACV Compound and the 1st Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) Infantry Division Headquarters.  He believes the Battle of Hue was so intense and in order to survive they had to put up a hell of a fight at the time; therefore, he should receive the CIB.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and two certificates received for his participation in the Battle of Hue.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 December 1966 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina and his advanced individual training as a radio operator (O5B) at Fort Knox, Kentucky before being transferred to Vietnam on 14 August 1967 for assignment to the MACV I Corps, Advisory Team 4 for duty as a radio operator.  On 28 September 1967, he was assigned to IV Corps, Advisory Team 65 as a radio operator.  

3.  He participated in four campaigns (including the TET Counteroffensive) and departed Vietnam on 13 August 1968 for assignment to Fort Stewart, Georgia where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service.  He had served 3 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal.

4.  The two certificates provided by the applicant are pre-printed certificates that do not specifically address the applicant’s role in the Battle of Hue.  Additionally, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he actually engaged the enemy in combat.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

6.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  Appendix 3 to Annex A of this regulation listed advisor positions which qualified for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The regulation authorized award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to radio/telephone operators provided their primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations. 



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been carefully considered and while there were provisions for awarding the radio operator of an advisory team the CIB, the individual concerned still had to meet the criteria for award of the CIB.

2.  A review of the available evidence failed to show that the applicant, while serving on an advisory team as a radio operator, actually engaged the enemy in combat as would an infantryman in order to qualify for the CIB.  The assignment to an advisory team alone does not qualify individuals for an automatic award of the CIB.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to award him the CIB at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009571



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009571



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005804C070208

    Original file (040005804C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows that the applicant was assigned to United States military units, e.g. 525th Military Intelligence Group and MACV Advisor Team 51, first as an intelligence analyst and later as an order of battle specialist in a G-2 Section of the 21st ARVN Infantry Division. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018553

    Original file (20070018553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show the award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the awards of the CIB, Army Good Conduct Medal first award for the period 4 February 1969 to 3 February 1971, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007279

    Original file (20100007279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. MACV Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided for award of the CIB. The evidence does not show he was awarded an infantryman MOS, nor was he assigned in a qualifying position authorized the award of the CIB as provided in MACV Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) while attached to the CORDS, Advisory Team 20 in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074769C070403

    Original file (2002074769C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Newark, New Jersey, on 22 August 1966, for a period of 3 years and training as a clerk typist. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. Additionally, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was recommended for or is entitled to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011624

    Original file (20120011624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was assigned to the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) as a radio operator and he participated in many combat operations with the Army of the Republic of Vietnam. The available records do not show he was awarded the CIB. In the absence of documentary evidence showing his primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the CIB or adding the CIB to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002913C071029

    Original file (20070002913C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate campaign or service medal including the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was a radio operator assigned to two advisory teams while in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 March 1968 through 8 October 1969; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015378

    Original file (20080015378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the available records. Evidence of record shows the applicant held MOS 05B and MOS 11B and served as a security guard in these MOSs while assigned to Advisory Team 32, MACV.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015748

    Original file (20090015748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Vietnamese Armed Forces Honor Medal, Second Class; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded or authorized to wear the CIB;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003727C070208

    Original file (20040003727C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 38 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) be corrected to show his correct principal duties; that he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Air Medal, and two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); that his NGB Form 21 (sic, presumably means the NGB Form 22) be corrected to reflect that he was twice chosen as Battery Soldier of the Year and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014947

    Original file (20090014947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the applicant's service personnel records. Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam General Orders Number 2299, dated 1 December 1967, show the applicant received the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force during the period June 1966 to December 1967. U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations)...