Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011624
Original file (20120011624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    31 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011624 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states he was assigned to the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) as a radio operator and he participated in many combat operations with the Army of the Republic of Vietnam.  He states he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for participating in combat operations.  He states he needs to have the CIB added to his record to apply for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.

3.  He provides:

* DD Form 214
* BSM Certificate
* CIB criteria

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 


3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on
14 November 1968.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman) and he was assigned to Vietnam.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 19 May 1969 to 14 June 1970 in duty MOS 05B (Radio Operator) with Advisory Team 86, III Corps Advisory Group, MACV.

4.  General Orders Number 2908, issued by Headquarters, MACV, dated 21 May 1970, awarded the applicant the BSM for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force during the period June 1969 to May 1970.

5.  His record also includes the citation for his award of the BSM that states, in part:

* he was responsible for transmitting many requests for urgent tactical support from allied units in contact with the enemy
* during critical situations, he was able to effect the timely and accurate response to those requests
* during combat operations, he performed in an exemplary manner by assisting in the coordination of artillery support fire, air strikes, and medical evacuations

6.  On 16 June 1970, he was honorably released from active duty by reason of early separation of an overseas returnee.  His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB.  

7.  There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records showing he was awarded the CIB.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman 


satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

9.  U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided for award of the CIB.  Appendix 3 to Annex A of this directive listed advisor positions in MACV which were considered infantry positions and for which award of the CIB was authorized.  Among these positions, "Radio/Telephone Operator" is listed with the statement "if the primary duty is to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to add the CIB to his DD Form 214.

2.  The record shows his performance of duty as a Radio Operator during combat operations was exemplary while he was assigned to a MACV Advisory Team.  Unfortunately, the record does not show what type of units his Advisory Team accompanied.  The available records do not show he was awarded the CIB.

3.  In the absence of documentary evidence showing his primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the CIB or adding the CIB to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011624



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011624



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002913C071029

    Original file (20070002913C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate campaign or service medal including the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was a radio operator assigned to two advisory teams while in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 March 1968 through 8 October 1969; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009571

    Original file (20140009571 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The regulation authorized award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to radio/telephone operators provided their primary duty was to accompany infantry or infantry-type units on tactical operations. A review of the available evidence failed to show that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015748

    Original file (20090015748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Vietnamese Armed Forces Honor Medal, Second Class; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded or authorized to wear the CIB;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027964

    Original file (20100027964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is also void of documentation showing he was awarded the CIB. In a statement provided with his application, the applicant indicated that he served with 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry, as an RTO and forward observer, but he was not eligible for the CIB because of his MOS. While the available documentation generally confirms his account of his service in Vietnam, it does not show definitively that he was assigned primary duty under MACV as an RTO accompanying infantry or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007996

    Original file (20120007996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of Combat Infantryman Badge. He noted, "Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards) determines the eligibility criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for service in the Republic of Vietnam and requires (1) assignment as an advisor to an infantry type unit of regimental or smaller size and (2) that the individual recommended must have been personally present and under fire while serving in an assigned primary duty as a member of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015378

    Original file (20080015378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the available records. Evidence of record shows the applicant held MOS 05B and MOS 11B and served as a security guard in these MOSs while assigned to Advisory Team 32, MACV.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018553

    Original file (20070018553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show the award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the awards of the CIB, Army Good Conduct Medal first award for the period 4 February 1969 to 3 February 1971, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007279

    Original file (20100007279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. MACV Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided for award of the CIB. The evidence does not show he was awarded an infantryman MOS, nor was he assigned in a qualifying position authorized the award of the CIB as provided in MACV Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) while attached to the CORDS, Advisory Team 20 in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072058C070403

    Original file (2002072058C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he is entitled to award of the CIB for his service as a member of Advisory Team 50 in Vietnam from 10 February 1968 to 30 September 1968. The Board also noted that proper authority in Vietnam at the time in question denied award of the CIB to the applicant because his duty position was deemed equivalent to a division level assignment, not a regimental or lower level assignment as required by regulations in effect at that time. The applicant’s duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014100

    Original file (20060014100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his report of separation (DD Form 214). He completed his jungle training and was transferred to Vietnam on 17 September 1969, where he was assigned as a student to the United States Army – Vietnam Advisory School.