Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009483
Original file (20140009483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  13 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140009483 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the remission/cancellation of his bonus debt. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 6 years for assignment to a troop program unit (TPU) and a $6,000 enlistment bonus.  He received a portion of the bonus with the remainder to be paid as earned.  He volunteered for active duty and served 18 months on active duty.  After his release from active duty, he was having a hard time finding a civilian job, so he applied for an overseas civilian contractor job and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) until his contract overseas was completed.  He then applied for an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position at Fort Hood, TX, where he served for 3 years.  In August 2013, he was notified that his debt had been remitted in the amount of $3,750.00; however, in November 2013, he was notified that the approval for debt remission had been cancelled because of inaccurate information regarding his spouse’s income.  In his sworn statement, he indicated he was married with four children and his spouse did not work because they have two special needs children.  He also indicated that she was unemployed from June to December 2012, when she accepted an AGR tour in Wisconsin.  Additionally, it is his intent to continue to serve in the USAR.

3.  The applicant provides a two-page letter explaining his application, letters from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) regarding his request to remit/cancel his debt, a Sworn Statement (DA Form 2823), copies of his orders, his request for repayment of his reenlistment bonus debt, and his Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness (DA Form 3508).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 July 1998 for a period of        3 years and training as a petroleum supply specialist.  He completed his training and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade E-6 on 1 March 2005.

2.  After receiving orders transferring him to Korea, he elected to sign a declination of continued service statement.  Consequently, he was processed for discharge.  

3.  On 10 March 2006, he enlisted in the USAR for a period of 6 years, assignment to a TPU, and a $6,000.00 enlistment bonus.  His bonus addendum is not contained in the available records.

4.  On 9 April 2009, the applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to accept civilian employment overseas.

5.  On 23 August 2011, he was ordered to active duty at Fort Hood, TX for a period of 1 year.  On 1 December 2011, he was promoted to the pay grade E-7.

6.  On 11 October 2012, he married a USAR Soldier who was ordered to active duty in the AGR Program for a period of 3 years in pay grade E-6.  

7.  On 29 May 2013, a Pay Adjustment Authorization (DD Form 139) directed the bonus recovery of $4,043.13.

8.  The applicant submitted a request for remission/cancellation of debt and included a sworn statement indicating that he was married with four children and his wife did not work because they had two special needs children.  He indicated that his wife had no income and his expenses exceeded his income.  He applied for remission/cancellation of his debt based on hardship.

9.  On 13 November 2013, the HRC notified him that the approval for partial remission of his debt made on 1 August 2013 was rescinded due to inaccurate information he provided regarding his spouse’s income.  He was advised to apply to this Board.

10.  On 21 March 2014, his spouse had their marriage annulled.

11.  He is currently serving on active duty as a USAR Recruiter.

12.  Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) serves as the authority for the remission or cancellation of indebtedness.  It provides that the objective of remission or cancellation is to remit or cancel debts that are considered unjust.
 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant’s bonus addendum is not present in the available evidence and he has not provided it, it appears that he enlisted in the USAR for a period of 6 years and assignment to a TPU.

2.  It also appears that the reasons for him not fulfilling his contract with service in a TPU were all based on personal decisions he made, none of which constitute an error or injustice on the part of the Army.  

3.  It also appears that he was not forthcoming in his application for remission/cancellation of his debt, as he indicated his spouse did not work and stayed at home with their two special needs children.  At the time he completed that application, his spouse was serving on an AGR tour in pay grade E-6.

4.  Therefore, since the applicant failed to show that there is an error or injustice or that the debt has created a hardship on him, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.   

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 




are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009483





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140009483



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011717

    Original file (20150011717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests remission of his indebtedness to the government in the amount of $2,448.49 for shipment of excess household goods (HHGs). The commander stated the applicant was the sole provider for his wife and two children, and as such, the debt incurred during his PCS move proved to be an overwhelming burden. The applicant submitted a DA Form 3508 to the Fort Bragg Finance Office that shows he was requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness based on hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009793

    Original file (20130009793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had DFAS processed his request, he would not have the debt. The form shows he requested to stop BAQ and that he had been assigned to government quarters. To determine injustice the application must contain evidence that the applicant did not know and could not have known of the error and/or the applicant inquired of a proper authority and was told the payment was correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017232

    Original file (20130017232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's Army Military Human Resource Record shows the applicant was confined by civilian authorities on 15 January 2011 for a period of 18 months and that he returned to duty on 17 September 2012. The evidence of record shows the applicant received pay and allowances while he was in civilian confinement and he incurred a debt in the amount of $47,467.00. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant applied to DFAS for proration of the remaining balance and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017641

    Original file (20120017641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was informed by the Fort Campbell Defense Military Pay Office, Fort Campbell, KY, that the BAH was not corrected and she had a BAH overpayment debt. However, there is no evidence in her available records and she has not provided evidence which shows the Fort Campbell Defense Military Pay Office was in error when it approved BAH for her based on her DA Form 5960. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's available record that shows the Fort Campbell Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058615C070421

    Original file (2001058615C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 March 2001, the DFAS Disbursing Officer, Fort Meade, Maryland, forwarded the applicant’s DA Form 3508-R to PERSCOM and confirmed the applicant was indebted to the government in the amount of $3362.82 and requested remission or cancellation of the debt based on hardship and injustice. It indicated that had the applicant still been on active duty when his request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness was received at PERSCOM, favorable consideration would have been granted. In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017108

    Original file (20130017108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests cancellation of the financial recoupment action pertaining to his Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus. He also signed a NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Reenlistment /Extension Bonus Addendum) which states termination of his bonus would occur without recoupment if he accepted a MILTECH position or Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position and on the effective date of his orders had served at least 6 months of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076561C070215

    Original file (2002076561C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 April 2002, the Special Actions Branch, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command disapproved the applicant's request for remission or cancellation of his indebtedness, apparently based upon the applicant's failure to inform finance that he was married to another service member who also was receiving BAH. All told, the pertinent parts of the chapter governing BAH is about 27 pages long. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076096C070215

    Original file (2002076096C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits copies of his: DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) with supporting documents; a memorandum from Chief, Special Actions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM); a notice of indebtedness from the installation finance office with supporting documents; an e-mail notification; and a copy of his May 2002 leave and earnings statement (LES). The letter also informed the applicant that $2,348.60 of the debt...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006402

    Original file (20120006402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official stated that after careful review of this case, it was their opinion that the applicant, a mobilized Reservist with a dependent, would be authorized BAH at the with-dependent rate based on his duty station of Fort Stewart, GA, at the time he was called to active duty. The regulation states, in pertinent part, that a Soldier's debts to the U.S. Army may be remitted or canceled in cases arising from payments made in error to a Soldier, payments made in excess of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005122

    Original file (20130005122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of her: * notification of and request for remission of debt * Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings and medical records * sworn statements * transfer orders * separation documents and retirement orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows she acknowledged she received the orders as of 15 October 2010. On 9 August 2012, the applicant was notified of a debt in the amount of $26,526.00 incurred due to...