Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008819
Original file (20140008819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  15 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008819 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests validation and payment of his Officer Accession Bonus (OAB).

2.  The applicant states that the Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) promised him a $10,000 OAB for accessing into the officer corps and he signed the contract on 3 October 2009.  He goes on to state that he told the officer strength manager (OSM) that he wanted to become a medical services (MS) officer because of his undergraduate degree and he was told that he needed to be assigned a branch prior to being branched to the MS Corps (MSC) because the process took 6 months to be branched to the MSC.  He further states that he believes the OSM provided poor guidance which has resulted in a negative impact on his bonus.  He also states that he signed his contract in good faith and continues to fulfill his obligation to the DEARNG and believes his contract should be validated. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his request for an exception to policy, his OAB addendum, Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit, a memorandum awarding him Branch, Functional Area, Area of Concentration, and college transcript.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the DEARNG upon completion of Officer Candidate School (OCS) on 2 October 2009 to accept a commission.

3.  On 3 October 2009, he was appointed as a United States Army Reserve (USAR) second lieutenant and a second lieutenant in the DEARNG within the Transportation Corps branch.

4.  On 3 October 2009 he also signed an OAB in the amount of $10,000 to be served as a Transportation Corps officer.  The addendum did not specify an area of concentration or military occupational specialty (MOS).  

5.  On 31 May 2011, the applicant completed the Army Medical Department Basic Officer Leader Course at Fort Sam Houston, Texas and on 19 January 2012, he was awarded the AOC of 70B Health Care Administrative Assistant in the MSC Branch.  He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 22 May 2012. 

6.  On 24 January 2012, the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied the applicant’s request for his OAB and indicated that his addendum did not contain an AOC and the only AOC he became qualified for was 70B and that AOC was not on the approved list of critical AOCs authorized an OAB at the time of his commissioning.

7.  Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308j(b), states the Secretary concerned may pay an accession bonus under this section to an eligible person who enters into an agreement with the Secretary to:  (a) accept an appointment as an officer in the Armed Forces and (b) to serve in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve in a skill designated under paragraph (2) for a period specified in the agreement.  Paragraph (2)(a) states the Secretary concerned shall designate for an Armed Force under the Secretary's jurisdiction the officer skills to which the authority under this subsection is to be applied.  Paragraph (2)(b) states a skill may be designated for an Armed Force under paragraph (2)(a) if, to mitigate a current or projected significant shortage of personnel in that Armed Force who are qualified in that skill, it is critical to increase the number of persons accessed into that Armed Force who are qualified in that skill or are to be trained in that skill.  Paragraph (2)(b) states an accession bonus payable to a person pursuant to an agreement under this section accrues on the date on which that agreement is accepted by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no doubt that the applicant entered into an agreement for payment of an OAB; however, the agreement was not a valid agreement because there was no  AOC (critical skill) annotated on his addendum and the only AOC he became qualified in was 70B and that AOC (MOS) was not authorized payment of an OAB.

2.  Notwithstanding that he signed his agreement, the very fact that his AOC/MOS is not on the list of critical specialties authorized an OAB makes the contract invalid. 

3.  While the actions of the Department in this matter are not condoned by the Board, the applicant was not entitled to receive an OAB at the time of his commissioning as he was not awarded an AOC that was on the approved list of critical AOCs authorized an OAB at the time of his commissioning.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis for granting the applicant’s request for payment of his OAB based on a flawed contract.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION









BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008819





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008819



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008156

    Original file (20140008156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the correct copy of the OAB Addendum was discovered after the denial of his exception to policy by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * the incomplete addendum was initially provided in the Guard Incentive Management System for payment submission * the Officer Strength Manager, who also was the witnessing official, discovered the correct addendum * after the correct addendum was submitted, another discrepancy was discovered in relation to the area of concentration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018238

    Original file (20130018238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) * self-authored statements * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings AR20090007581, dated 16 June 2009 * OAB Agreement * 2 ETP Denial Letters, dated 7 June 2013 and 1 July 2013 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * NGB Form 22 * NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB ETP denial letters both show: * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013381

    Original file (20140013381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of the second installment of her Officer Accession Bonus (OAB). The applicant provides: * Written Agreement-OAB Addendum * Request for Exception to Policy to retain OAB memoranda (self and state) * NGB denial to retain OAB memorandum * U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Standard Form (SF) 50-B (Notification of Personnel Action) * NGB Memorandum, subject: Army National Guard (ARNG) Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Guidance for Fiscal Year (FY)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004342

    Original file (20150004342.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In connection with this appointment, she signed a Written Agreement-OAB Addendum, wherein she indicated; * she agreed to serve in the Selected Reserve in AOC 15A which is a critical officer skill that is designated for bonus entitlement by the Secretary of Defense or his delegate * she agreed to accomplish the necessary training to achieve this designation within 36 months of appointment * she is being accessed into the NGB approved critical skill of 15A and shall receive $10,000 paid in two...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011362

    Original file (20130011362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to be eligible for the SELRES OAB as a commissioned officer an individual in the ARNG must meet the Headquarters, Department of the Army eligibility criteria and be appointed in a critically-short AOC listed in the current ARNG SRIP announcement in effect on the date the individual makes application for officer appointment/training or on or before the officer's appointment date. He was appointed as a second lieutenant in the DEARNG on 2 October 2010 and his Written Agreement-OAB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013486

    Original file (20110013486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of his Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) of $10,000. His Written Agreement - OAB Addendum shows that he was being accessed into the ARNG in a critical skill area of concentration/military occupational specialty and was to receive a bonus of $10,000 paid in two 50 percent installments. Based on the above, his records should be corrected to show that he signed the Written Agreement - OAB Addendum on 22 May 2009, the date of his appointment, and is fully eligible to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020491

    Original file (20130020491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    To qualify for an OAB the officer must sign the OAB Addendum on the date they accept their commission as a second lieutenant or appointment as a warrant officer and the Addendum must contain a bonus control number. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was appointed as an FLARNG 2LT EN Corps officer in the critical AOC of 12B and he executed an oath of office on 8 May 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012936

    Original file (20110012936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 127-801, dated 7 May 2009, released him from HHC, 63d Theater Aviation Brigade, and transferred him to Company B, 351st Aviation Support Brigade, Frankfort, KY, effective the date of the orders. His record includes a memorandum, dated 16 June 2011, showing he was selected by a board for appointment in the ARNG in the Medical Service Corps (MSC) in AOC 67J. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by paying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013699

    Original file (20130013699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He is requesting the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) recommend the NGB payment of the OAB due to the fact that as a National Guardsman he could never actually be assigned to MOS 153A, but the intent of contracting officers to become pilots in the ARNG had been met, as he is now a 153D Blackhawk Pilot. A memorandum, dated 22 March 2012, wherein he requested an ETP for the bonus payment on the grounds the required MOS for payment only being a temporary MOS until...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015128

    Original file (20140015128.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he properly completed an Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) Addendum and is authorized to retain a $10,000 OAB. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he properly completed an OAB Addendum and is authorized to retain a $10,000 OAB. The available evidence shows the applicant completed BOLC (formerly OBC) in 2011 and should have been paid his OAB had the above discussed error not occurred.