Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015128
Original file (20140015128.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE: 14 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015128 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he properly completed an Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) Addendum and is authorized to retain a $10,000 OAB.

2.  The applicant states he was commissioned on 2 May 2008 in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and became branch qualified in area of concentration (AOC) 70B (Health Services Administration).

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* an OAB Addendum, dated 2 May 2008
* a memorandum, Request for Exception to Policy (ETP), dated 20 December 2013

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 2 May 2008, the applicant took his oath of office as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT), pay grade O-1.

2.  A copy of the OAB Addendum, as provided by the applicant and filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), shows he agreed to accept an appointment as an officer in the Armed Forces and to serve in a critical skill that is designated for bonus entitlement within the ARNG.  He acknowledged with his initials that he was being accessed into a National Guard Bureau (NGB) approved critical unit and would receive a $10,000 bonus to be paid in one lump sum upon successful completion of the Officer Basic Course (OBC).  The applicant signed this form on 16 April 2008 prior to his appointment.  The service representative and witness each signed and dated the form on 2 May 2008, the date of the applicant's appointment.  The form contains a bonus control number.  The addendum does not indicate the contracted AOC.

3.  A DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 20 September 2011 shows the applicant completed the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Basic Officer Leadership Course (BOLC) in AOC 70B.

4.  A Memorandum for Medical Recruiting Battalions, dated 21 May 2012, shows the applicant acquired an AOC of 65 (Physicians Assistant) effective the same date as the memorandum.

5.  In an ETP letter dated 20 December 2013, as provided by the applicant and contained in his OMPF, the Deputy G1 (Personnel Officer) for the ARNG determined that the applicant's OAB would be terminated without recoupment by the State Incentive Manager due to the following discrepancies:

	a.  He was not serving in the AOC for which he contracted.  This is a violation of ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06 (10 August 2007 to 28 February 2009).

	b.  He signed the addendum prior to the date of his appointment.  This is also a violation ARNG SRIP 07-06.

6.  A Memorandum, Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel, South Carolina, dated 18 February 2014, states the applicant held AOC 65D and 70B; and that they would be properly recorded on his Officer Record Brief.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he properly completed an OAB Addendum and is authorized to retain a $10,000 OAB.

2.  The available evidence shows that the applicant was eligible at the time of his appointment in 2008 to contract for an OAB in the amount of $10,000.00.  Unfortunately, due to the failure of officials to properly review the OAB addendum, the document was processed with an improperly dated signature by the applicant.  This error invalidated the applicant's OAB addendum.

3.  The available evidence shows the applicant completed BOLC (formerly OBC) in 2011 and should have been paid his OAB had the above discussed error not occurred.

4.  The argument put forth by the G1, ARNG stating that the applicant was no longer serving in the contracted AOC is without merit.  Evidence shows that the applicant's AOC was not changed until 21 May 2012, which was after he had already met the requirements to receive an OAB.  Unfortunately, an improperly completed addendum prevented the applicant from receiving his payment.  There is no evidence showing the applicant was at fault for any part of this failure.  He simply acted in good faith and relied on the knowledge and expertise of officials who should have known better.

5.  In view of the above, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records by showing he had properly and timely contracted for an OAB in the amount of $10,000.00 in conjunction with his original appointment on 2 May 2008.  

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant properly and timely signed an Officer Accession Bonus Addendum that was prepared in accordance with the governing regulations/policies and was subsequently processed in a timely manner by the appropriate officials;

	b.  paying the applicant a $10,000 OAB; and


	c.  adjusting the applicant's military pay records to ensure he retains the $10,000.00 bonus that was in effect at the time of his appointment.




      ____________x______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014535



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015128



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018238

    Original file (20130018238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) * self-authored statements * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings AR20090007581, dated 16 June 2009 * OAB Agreement * 2 ETP Denial Letters, dated 7 June 2013 and 1 July 2013 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * NGB Form 22 * NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB ETP denial letters both show: * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001725

    Original file (20140001725.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he is entitled to a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB). Notwithstanding the NGB advisory opinion, a review of the critical skill list in effect at the time the applicant contracted for the OAB contains the AOC 153M; therefore, it appears that an administrative error occurred during the processing of his ETP. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003703

    Original file (20140003703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he is qualified for the Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) he contracted for on 5 May 2007. He filed an inspector general (IG) complaint in October of 2010 with the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG) and, on 2 January 2014, he received a memorandum explaining he was denied the OAB for the following reasons: (1) He was not entitled to the incentive based upon the “law eligibility requirements which violates ARNG SRIP [Selected Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020643

    Original file (20130020643.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The OAB addendum stated the applicant agreed to serve in CS AOC 88D; however, he did not attend BOLC for 88D and the unit he was assigned to did not have any 88D slots. The applicant attended BOLC for 88A, which was also a CS AOC at the time he signed the OAB addendum, and he is slotted in an 88A position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and state ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected to show: * the 15 August 2011 Written Agreement – OAB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140014535

    Original file (AR20140014535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing he completed an Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) Addendum and is authorized to retain a $6,000 OAB. The SIAC had audited the applicant's OAB record and determined that even though he was eligible to contract for the OAB, he was not eligible to receive payment. The available evidence shows that the applicant was eligible at the time of his appointment in 2005 to contract for an OAB in the amount of $6,000.00.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024782

    Original file (20100024782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, following his enlistment, but prior to his subsequent appointment/commissioning in the CAARNG, he was informed he was eligible for a $10,000.00 Officer Accession Bonus. The applicant was eligible for this incentive, however no bonus addendum was signed and no control number was ever correctly requested for this incentive. (6) Corrective training, additional control measures to include the assignment of a Soldier to do nothing but perform quality checks and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009362

    Original file (20140009362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was eligible for a $10,000 OAB due to his critical area of concentration (AOC) of 12B (Engineer) and completion of the Officer Basic Course. The applicant provides: * Request for documentation from the Incentives Task Force * Incentives Task Force Bonus Audit Form * ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Guidance for Fiscal Year 2007, 1 January to 31 March 2007 (Policy Number 07-04) * Extension of ARNG SRIP Policy Number 07-04 to 15 June 2007 * List of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011873

    Original file (20130011873.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He explains recoupment was initiated due to the fact that the service representative and incentive manager (IM) for the state of Montana signed his officer accession agreement over one year after his commissioning date. The official stated the details of his contract/agreement were as follows: * State accessed: Montana; Unit Identification Code (UIC): TQST0 * Date of agreement: 29 September 2008 * Contracted bonus addendum: $10,000.00 * Contracted AOC: 35D; Current AOC 15C * Date duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007193

    Original file (20130007193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * 2 memoranda * 2 Written Agreement Officer/Warrant Officer Accession Bonus Addenda * Incentives Task Force (ITF) Bonus Audit Form * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 337 (Oaths of Office) * Commissioning Timeline * Exception to Policy (ETP) Request, dated 17 October 2012 * Critical Officer Area of Concentration List for the period 1 January 2007 through 31 March 2007 * Extension of Army National Guard (ARNG) Selected Reserve Incentive Program Policy 07-04 (SRIP 07-04)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012604

    Original file (20140012604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to retain the $10,000 Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) in the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG). She provides and her records contain a copy of a Written Agreement - OAB Addendum, dated 15 December 2008. The ARNG offers a $10,000 Officer Accession/Affiliation Bonus to newly-commissioned officers and newly-appointed warrant officers who agree to serve 6 years in a Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTOE) unit.