Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008673
Original file (20140008673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008673 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests transfer of her educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to her children.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  She submitted a request to transfer her education benefits to her family members under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill and her request was disapproved due to the time she had left in the Army; she was instructed to extend her enlistment.  She contacted her career counselor and was notified she was ineligible to extend due to her current grade.  She submitted documentation that showed she was going through a medical evaluation board (MEB) and was told she needed to be promoted to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 to be able to transfer her education benefits.

	b.  She believes this decision should be changed because she won't be able to make the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 before the completion of the MEB.  She submitted her request to transfer her education benefits numerous times and was told different reasons each time it was disapproved.  She completed her college education while on active duty and would like to give her children the opportunity to complete their degrees.  She will be separated in the near future, education costs a lot, and it would be one less thing she would have to worry about as a single parent.

3.  The applicant provides two memoranda and six pages of email.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is an active duty Regular Army (RA) Soldier serving in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 assigned to the 47th Brigade Support Battalion (BSB), Fort Bliss, TX.  She enlisted in the RA on 5 January 2007 for a period of 4 years and 22 weeks.  She attained the rank of SPC on 1 August 2009.  

2.  She reenlisted in the RA in March 2010 and September 2012.  Her expiration term of service (ETS) date is 13 September 2016.  

3.  The applicant provides an email written to her from the U.S. Army Human Resources Commander (HRC), dated 10 July 2013, wherein it stated:

	a.  The request to transfer her education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill had been reviewed but was in a pending status due to her having insufficient retainability to fulfill the required service obligation associated with transferring her benefits to an eligible dependent.  

	b.  If she did not have 20 qualifying years of service by 1 August 2009, then she must serve 4 years on active duty from the date of her request.  Her request was dated 3 June 2013 and her ETS date was 13 September 2016.  Her ETS would have to be at least 3 June 2017 in order to qualify.

4.  She provides an email from the 47th BSB Retention Noncommissioned Officer (NCO), dated 22 January 2014, wherein it stated she (the applicant) was a non-promotable specialist and her ETS date put her over the Retention Control Point (RCP) for her current rank, so unless she became promotable she was ineligible to extend or reenlist.  

5.  The applicant also provides a memorandum written to her commander, from the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Liaison Officer, William Beaumont Army Medical Center (BAMC), El Paso, TX, dated 6 March 2014, stating she was currently undergoing physical disability processing with planned referral to the PEB.

6.  Law 110-552 establishes legal limitations on the transferability of unfunded Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits and limits eligibility to members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.  In order to transfer benefits to a Soldier:


   a.  must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her family members; 

	b.  must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children;  

	c.  has to have at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	d.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or Department of Defense) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute.

7.  Military Personnel Message Number 11-096, dated 25 March 2011, Subject:  Change to RCP for Enlisted Soldiers Serving in the RA or Under the Active Guard Reserve Title 10 Programs, stated the RCP for SPC was 8 years and 12 years for promotable SPC.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant, a non-promotable SPC, enlisted in the RA on 5 January 2007 and her ETS is 13 September 2016.  On 3 June 2013, she requested to transfer her education benefits to her children but it was denied due to her not having the required retainability.

2.  In order to transfer education benefits under Post 9/11 GI Bill a Soldier must have at least 6 years of service on the date of election and agree to serve 4 additional years or have served at least 10 years on the date of election.  In addition, to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to children a Soldier must have 10 years of eligible service.  

3.  The requirement to have served at least 10 years to transfer education benefits to eligible children under the Post 9/11 GI Bill is embedded in the law and a change to this law is not within the purview of this Board.  As the applicant does not have the required service, as required by law, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting her the requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008673



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008673



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140020958

    Original file (AR20140020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show her request to transfer her education benefits to her eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. The applicant provides: * Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, Director of Military Personnel Management (DMPM), denial of applicant's request for a TEB exception to policy * information paper * emails * website screen printout of her TEB request * excerpts...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005622

    Original file (20120005622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A VA Certificate of Eligibility, dated 23 February 2012, shows the applicant was approved to transfer 36 months of education benefits to her daughter under the Post 9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had nearly 12 years of service as of the program’s implementation date of 1 August 2009; therefore, she was eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children. She transferred benefits to her dependent on 19 January 2012. d. A Soldier must also agree to serve the prescribed additional service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013353

    Original file (20130013353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    , dated 14 December 2012 * Memorandum, Subject: Request for Implementation of the Proposed Policy to Allow Officers Who are Twice Non-Selected for Promotion to Colonel (COL) to have the 4-year MSO Shortened if They Seek to Retire, dated 29 January 2013 * Post 911 GI Bill Frequently Asked Questions * Memorandum, Subject: Request for Voluntary Retirement, dated 6 December 2012 * Milconnect Transfer of Education Benefits CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In her request, she stated that she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019755

    Original file (20130019755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was never contacted by a reenlistment NCO or a Career Counselor to discuss the benefit. The form also stated that he had 19 years, 7 months, and 16 days of eligible service at the time of the second request. When he applied for TEB in 2009, he had not completed the required 20 years of service; therefore, his request was denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001056

    Original file (20150001056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval to transfer his educational benefits under the provisions of the Post-9/11 Transfer of Benefits (TEB) program to his dependents. Even if he had gotten out of the Army with an approved transfer request, the service obligation would have precluded his dependents from being approved for the benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Also, he was advised that the Post-9/11 GI Bill is still his to use; however, his dependents are not eligible to use...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015376

    Original file (20130015376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests transfer of educational benefits to her dependent children under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service, individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014404

    Original file (20140014404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant was transferred to the TDRL on 28 January 2013. b. PL 110-252, section 3319 (Authority to transfer unused education benefits to family members), which states in subparagraph (i)(2)(B)(ii) - an exception to the failure to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008282

    Original file (20120008282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service; and d. for those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service is required. There is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer educational benefits to her family members while in an active status. The applicant contends that she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006399

    Original file (20120006399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 22 years of service upon her transfer to the Retired Reserve, so she was eligible to transfer to either spouse or children (if she completed the request before leaving military service). c. a Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible family members. Those who retired on or after 1 August 2009, by law, were eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits providing he or she requested to transfer TEB prior to the day of retirement or transfer to the...