Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015376
Original file (20130015376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    1 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015376 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests transfer of educational benefits to her dependent children under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  She states she was denied the right to transfer her benefits to her dependent sons.  She signed a declination statement and she was counseled concerning the consequences of signing the declination, but there was no mention of her not qualifying to transfer her educational benefits.  Since she retired, she is unable to have stable jobs and, therefore, is unable to pay for her children's education.  She gave the military 13 years and was retired with an 80 percent (%) disability rating for post-traumatic stress disorder.

3.  She provides:

* Orders 179-0148, dated 27 June 2012
* DA Form 4991-R (Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS)), dated 7 February 2011
* Emails
* Memorandum, Subject:  Exception to Policy (ETP), Applicant, dated
27 July 2012





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 December 1999.  She served in Iraq from 15 May 2008 to 15 August 2009.  

2.  On 7 February 2011, the applicant signed a DCSS establishing her expiration term of service (ETS) as 16 December 2011.  Her ETS was later adjusted to 
16 December 2012 for physical disability processing.

3.  On 2 May 2012, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found her physically unfit and recommended a combined disability rating of 80% for post-traumatic stress disorder, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, and right lower extremity radiculopathy.  On 5 June 2012, she concurred with the PEB's findings. 

4.  On 27 July 2012, the Chief, Enlisted Career Systems Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, responded to the applicant's request for an ETP to transfer her educational benefits to her dependent children under the TEB  provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.  The G-1 representative disapproved her request and said she was not eligible to transfer her benefits due to her signing a DCSS.  He stated that she was approved for a separation due to a medical disability with an effective date of 28 August 2012, but was still not otherwise eligible. 

5.  On 9 August 2012, the applicant requested assistance in finding out more information regarding the DCSS she signed when she was placed on assignment instructions to Fort Jackson, SC.  She said if she would have been aware that this would have interfered with her transferring her educational benefits to her sons, she would have thought about it twice.

6.  On 28 August 2012, she was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List in the grade of staff sergeant/E-6.  She was credited with completing 12 years,
8 months, and 1 day of creditable active service.

7.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible member is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or
	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

8.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service, individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill document accordingly, and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

9.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy which identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance for administration of the program.

10.  DOD, the Army, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that on 7 February 2011 the applicant signed a DCSS establishing her ETS as 16 December 2011, which was later adjusted to 16 December 2012 for physical disability processing.  In accordance with the DOD policy, as cited above, she was required to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date she elected to transfer her educational benefits to her dependents.  This could not have occurred because of the DCSS.

2.  Further, her argument that she was not informed of the consequences of signing the DCSS is not sufficient as a basis to approve her request.  The DOD, the VA, and the Army conducted a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria.  A Soldier must meet various criteria to qualify to transfer benefits to an eligible dependent.

3.  There are no provisions under the TEB that allow the 4-year active duty service obligation to be waived when the Soldier signed a DCSS so as not to be required to perform a permanent change of station move.  

4.  The applicant’s service medical records are not available, nor are any of her post-deployment medical assessments that might have shown any PTSD symptoms or other medical conditions after her return from deployment.  At this time, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015376





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015376



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017881

    Original file (20140017881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to family members. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving on active duty until his disability retirement on 26 January 2012. As he had over 10 years of active duty service, he would have been eligible to transfer any unused education benefits to his eligible family members through the TEB database.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005622

    Original file (20120005622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A VA Certificate of Eligibility, dated 23 February 2012, shows the applicant was approved to transfer 36 months of education benefits to her daughter under the Post 9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had nearly 12 years of service as of the program’s implementation date of 1 August 2009; therefore, she was eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children. She transferred benefits to her dependent on 19 January 2012. d. A Soldier must also agree to serve the prescribed additional service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008282

    Original file (20120008282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service; and d. for those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service is required. There is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer educational benefits to her family members while in an active status. The applicant contends that she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021979

    Original file (20130021979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record does not contain any documentation that indicates he transferred, or attempted to transfer, his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, prior to his date of retirement. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010903

    Original file (20120010903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 also established the legal requirements for the transferability of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The applicant's last day of service with the Army National Guard was 31 January 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 January 2011. As the applicant failed to transfer the benefits to his son while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019627

    Original file (20140019627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. While on active duty, the applicant submitted a request to transfer his education benefits under the TEB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019514

    Original file (20130019514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his sons under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The Army did not have a record of his GI Bill. Records show the applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no convincing evidence showing he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009487

    Original file (20130009487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she transferred GI Bill benefits to her dependents on 30 July 2011, as soon as she learned of the requirement. In order to remove her active duty service obligation (ADSO) and facilitate her request for retirement she revoked the transfer on 6 September 2012. However, in order to be eligible to transfer her education benefits she would have had to request the transfer while on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008109

    Original file (20120008109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his spouse under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant states he was never informed nor was he aware that the Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits had to be transferred while still in service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017053

    Original file (20130017053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was not properly informed of the requirement to transfer educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his immediate family members prior to his retirement from the U.S. Army Reserve. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. His request to correct his record to show he was eligible to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits has...