Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008223
Original file (20140008223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  10 February 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008223 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he retired in the pay grade of E-7.

2.  The applicant states that prior to a 3-year break in service, he served over 10 years in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in the pay grade of E-7.  When he returned to the USAR, he returned in the pay grade of E-6 and served until he met retirement eligibility; however, he was retired in the pay grade of E-6 instead of E-7, the highest grade he held in the USAR. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of the response from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), retirement orders, his 20-Year letter, chronological statement of retirement points, DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), promotion orders, discharge orders, and enlistment contract.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served in the Regular Army for 3 years and was honorably released from active duty on 25 August 1978 and was transferred to the USAR on 26 August 1978. 

2.  He continued to serve in the USAR through a series of continuous reenlistments and was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 21 February 1988.  He continued to serve in that pay grade until he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 15 June 1999.

3.  On 13 January 2005, he again enlisted in the USAR in the pay grade of E-6 for a period of 6 years.  He was issued his 20-Year letter on 12 February 2009 and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired) on 20 September 2009.
  
4.  On 15 February 2014, he was placed on the AUS Retired List in the pay grade of E-6.

5.  A review of his official records failed to show any indication that the applicant was ever reduced in grade due to misconduct.

6.  Section 1370(d) of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides that an individual entitled to non-regular retired pay shall upon application for retired pay be credited with satisfactory service in the highest grade in which that person served satisfactorily at any time in the armed forces.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant satisfactorily served in the USAR in the pay grade of E-7 from 21 February 1988 until he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 15 June 1999.

2.  Although he enlisted in the USAR in the pay grade of E-6 on 13 January 2005 and served until he reached retirement eligibility, he is entitled by statute to be retired in the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served at any time in the armed forces.

3.  Accordingly, his records should be corrected to show that he was placed on the AUS Retired List in the pay grade of E-7 on 15 February 2014 and is entitled to retired pay at that rate effective 15 February 2014 with entitlement to all back retired pay that flow from that change.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was placed on the AUS Retired List in the pay grade of E-7 on 15 February 2014 and is entitled to retired pay at that rate effective 15 February 2014 with entitlement to all retired pay that flow from that change.





      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008223





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008223



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009458

    Original file (20130009458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Retired Activities Directorate, Army Reserve Personnel Center, now known as HRC, will screen each retirement applicant's record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service to determine the highest grade satisfactorily held. If the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade will be that grade which a commissioned officer or enlisted Soldier held while serving on active duty or in an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020938

    Original file (20130020938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * Orders Number 052-053 * Orders Number 052-053 (Corrected Copy) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Honorable Discharge Certificate * letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) * his letter to the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) and their response CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 June 2010, he was placed on the retired list in the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003266

    Original file (20130003266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the armed forces. The evidence of record in this case confirms he was promoted to the grade of E-7 while serving in the USAR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008924

    Original file (20140008924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was placed on the Army of the United States (AUS) Retired List in pay grade E-7. d. A DD Form 368 (Request for Discharge or Clearance from Reserve Component), dated 3 September 1992, showing she requested clearance to enlist in the ARARNG. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-7 in the AFRES effective 1 September 1988 and served in that rank/grade for more than 2 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068447C070402

    Original file (2002068447C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: The retirement grade of major shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). The retirement orders submitted by the applicant supporting his contention that he was promoted to the grade of major, dated 2 May 1978, show his highest grade held on active duty was captain, not major.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013559

    Original file (20070013559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends if he had been promoted to LTC with a date of rank of 24 June 1983, it would have given him the time in grade and the active duty service requirement to retire in the grade of LTC. The opinion continues that the applicant's promotion eligibility date to LTC was 23 September 1989, however, he was appointed a warrant officer on 24 June 1988 and was not eligible for promotion consideration to LTC. Additionally, the applicant contends that his records should show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017795

    Original file (20130017795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DA Form 2-1 indicates in block 5 (Assignment Consideration): * he was not recommended for further service on 13 June 1986 * he had been removed from the SFC/E-7 Selection list * his bar to reenlistment was reviewed and it was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021149

    Original file (20140021149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 while serving on active duty and took a voluntary reduction to accept a vacant full-time position closer to his home. This service may consist of combined active service and service in the USAR Control Group (Retired) and the Army Grade Determination Board is the agency that reviews the records and/or applications for advancement on the Retired list in behalf of the Secretary, for those who have attained 30 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007324

    Original file (20140007324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Orders D-06-036713, dated 4 June 1985 * DD Form 214, ending on 9 February 1983 * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement * Retirement Orders P08-926117, dated 25 August 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, on 16 January 1980, and he held that grade until 9 February 1983 when he was honorably released from active duty and discharged from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013066

    Original file (20110013066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 1978 to show the correct periods of foreign service in Vietnam and Korea. The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows he was in Vietnam and Korea at the same time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 27 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 June 1978 the entries...