Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008137
Original file (20140008137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008137 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from former spouse to spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states:

* his original SBP election was former spouse
* his former spouse recently passed away
* he submitted a request to add his current spouse for SBP spouse coverage and was denied due to recent changes to the SBP law
* he has paid his share into the SBP for 360 payments and now his current wife is not eligible for the benefit
* he invested so much into his military career and the monies paid into the SBP, now he is out the premiums and his current wife is without coverage 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Retirement orders
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Marriage certificate
* Letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
* Death certificate
* Divorce decree
* Two DD Forms 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate) 
 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 July 1960.  He served in a variety of assignments and attained the rank of first sergeant (1SG)/E-8.

2.  The applicant and his former spouse (now deceased) Karan were married on 
9 June 1978.

3.  He retired on 4 March 1981 and he was placed on the Retired List in his retired grade of 1SG/E-8 on 31 August 1981.

4.  A DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 
1 April 1981, indicates he elected SBP coverage for spouse and dependent children based on the full amount of his retired pay. 

5.  On 6 December 1996, he and Karan were divorced.  The divorce decree required him to designate Karan as the SBP beneficiary.

6.  On 31 May 1999, he married Lucille.

7.  On 16 January 2014, his former spouse died.

8.  On 25 February 2014, he submitted two DD Forms 2656-6 to DFAS.  On one he indicated his current coverage is “Former Spouse,” and he requested a change in coverage based on the death of his former spouse.  On the other he requested a change in coverage based on his remarriage and indicated he wishes to resume existing coverage for his new spouse.

9.  On 18 March 2014, DFAS denied his request.  A DFAS official stated their office is unable to process his request.  The law governing the SBP states that an election for former spouse coverage terminates any prior coverage held.  Therefore, the law does not permit him to add his current spouse onto his SBP coverage.  He may have the option to elect spouse coverage during a future Open Season to be determined by Congress.

10.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances

11.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.
12.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former military spouses of retired members and reservists.

13.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 states:

	a.  A person who is a participant in the SBP and is providing coverage for a spouse or a spouse and child (even though there is no beneficiary currently eligible for such coverage), and who has a former spouse who was not that person’s former spouse when that person became eligible to participate in the Plan, may elect to provide an annuity to that former spouse.

     b.  Any such election terminates any previous coverage under the SBP.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence indicates at the time of his retirement in 1981 the applicant was married to Karan and he elected spouse and dependent children SBP coverage based on the full amount of his retired pay.

2.  The available evidence also shows he and Karan were divorced on 
6 December 1996.  The divorce decree he provides obligated him to change his SBP election to former spouse SBP coverage, which he did.  By law, the change in category terminated his previous coverage.  Unfortunately, there is no provision of law authorizing a new SBP election or reinstatement of a previous SBP election upon the death of a former spouse beneficiary.

3.  His next possible opportunity to effect a change in coverage is during an Open Season.  It is unclear when Congress will authorize an Open Season, but he is advised to read Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published, and now online, to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.  If Congress establishes another SBP Open Enrollment Season, Army Echoes will give guidance on how to enroll his spouse in the SBP.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___   DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008137





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008137



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003363

    Original file (20140003363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his paid-up Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from former spouse to spouse coverage. The available evidence indicates at the time of his retirement in 1982 the applicant was married to Liliane and he elected spouse SBP coverage based on the full amount. The divorce decree he provides did not obligate him to change his SBP election to "former spouse" SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021457

    Original file (20120021457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage and designated her as the annuitant of the SBP. On 15 May 1999, the FSM married the applicant. There are no documents in the available record, or provided by the applicant, that shows the FSM ever made an election to participate in the SBP within 1 year of his remarriage or during an Open Season enrollment period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012822

    Original file (20060012822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM divorced M___ E___ in 1982. MEMBER NEVER CANCELED HIS SBP ELECTION AFTER HIS DIVORCE. The evidence of record shows he was not married to the applicant at the time of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007305

    Original file (20130007305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Despite this, there is no documentation in his record that shows he elected to participate in the RCSBP after receiving his 15-year letter. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provides a means for those who have qualified for Reserve retirement, but who are not yet age 60 [upon which they would be eligible to begin drawing retired pay, upon request, and to participate in the SBP], to provide an annuity to their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007567

    Original file (20120007567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 14 May 1996, the applicant and the FSM were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement (or during an open-season election prior to his/her divorce), or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022330

    Original file (20130022330.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After a period of divorce, they remarried in 2010 and remained married until his death in 2013. A review of the FSM's records indicated the FSM elected not to participate in the SBP upon his retirement in 1987. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a voluntary change in election from "former spouse and child" coverage to "spouse and child" coverage on 1 June 2010 (the first day of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012453

    Original file (20140012453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This requires establishment of his current spouse as the only eligible SBP beneficiary of record. Public Law 99-661, dated 18 November 1984, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows prior to his retirement, he completed an SBP election form wherein he elected SBP former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018531

    Original file (20130018531.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was single at the time and he made an SBP election for children only coverage. Therefore, as a matter of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he enrolled his spouse in the SBP within 1 year of his marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant made a voluntary change in his SBP election from child only to spouse and child on 10 July 2008 and that the request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019074

    Original file (20140019074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter from DFAS to the applicant, dated 22 September 2014, stated an adjustment was made to the SBP portion of his retired pay account. The applicant provides: a. A death certificate showing the death of his former spouse on 30 August 2014. c. Letter from DFAS which essentially states: * this was a response to the applicant's inquiry regarding the election of SBP for his current spouse * DFAS was unable to process the applicant's request because the laws governing SBP did not permit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019716

    Original file (20120019716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he added a new spouse to his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election within one year of their marriage. The applicant states, in effect, he divorced his former spouse in November 2005; however, she made a deemed election for coverage and remained listed as the beneficiary for the SBP. In April 2011, he married his current spouse and was told he could not list his new spouse as a beneficiary for the SBP as long as his former spouse was...