IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 October 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140003363
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show his paid-up Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from former spouse to spouse coverage.
2. The applicant states:
* upon his retirement, he elected full coverage for his spouse under the SBP; however, he and his spouse were divorced after his retirement
* he continued to provide coverage for his former spouse, voluntarily and not part of a court order or a written agreement because of moral obligation
* he remarried and has been married to his current spouse for 20 years; he was always under the impression that upon the death of his former spouse, he would be able to transfer coverage to current spouse
* he reported his former spouses death in a timely manner but he did not receive a timely response from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
* when he inquired, he was told he could not change the election because an election for former spouse SBP coverage terminated any previous coverage held
* he does not understand the rationale or the letter he received; he believes this is unfair and unjust to someone who served and paid-up all his premiums
3. The applicant provides:
* DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Change Certificate)
* Divorce decree from Liliane
* Death certificate of Liliane
* Marriage document to Monique
* Letter from DFAS
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant and his former spouse (now deceased) Liliane were married on 28 March 1959.
2. He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army and executed an oath of office on 16 April 1961. He entered active duty on 4 July 1961.
3. He served in a variety of stateside or overseas assignments and he attained the rank of colonel (COL).
4. He retired on 30 September 1982 and he was placed on the Retired List in his retired grade of COL/O-6 on 1 October 1982.
5. His records do not contain DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel). However, subsequent correspondence from DFAS indicated he elected spouse coverage based on the full amount.
6. On 13 April 1990, he and Liliane were divorced. His divorce decree (foreign but translated to English) is silent with respect to the SBP.
7. His election from spouse to former spouse coverage is also not available for review with this case. However, DFAS indicated he elected former spouse coverage.
8. On 29 December 1993, he married Monique. He provides a foreign marriage contact with a translation to English.
9. On 18 October 2013, his former spouse died. He provides a foreign death certificate with English sub-titles.
10. On 4 November 2013, he submitted a DD Form 2656-6 to DFAS. He indicated his current coverage is "Former Spouse," he is requesting a change in coverage based on his remarriage, and he wishes to resume his existing level of coverage for his new spouse. He and a witness authenticated this form with their signatures.
11. On 17 December 2016, DFAS denied his request. A DFAS official stated their office is unable to process his request. The law governing the SBP states that an election for former spouse coverage terminates any prior coverage held. Therefore, the law does not permit him to add his current spouse onto his SBP coverage. He may have the option to elect spouse coverage during a future Open Season to be determined by Congress.
12. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances
13. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.
14. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former military spouses of retired members and reservists.
15. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 states in:
a. Sub-paragraph (b)(3)(A)(i) that a person who is a participant in the Plan and is providing coverage for a spouse or a spouse and child (even though there is no beneficiary currently eligible for such coverage), and who has a former spouse who was not that persons former spouse when that person became eligible to participate in the Plan, may elect to provide an annuity to that former spouse.
b. Sub-paragraph (b)(3)(A)(ii) states that any such election terminates any previous coverage under the Plan.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The available evidence indicates at the time of his retirement in 1982 the applicant was married to Liliane and he elected spouse SBP coverage based on the full amount.
2. The available evidence also shows he and Liliane were divorced in April 1990. The divorce decree he provides did not obligate him to change his SBP election to "former spouse" SBP coverage. A change in SBP to former spouse beneficiary would have had to have been a strictly voluntary action on the part of the applicant, which the evidence of record shows he did make. Thus the voluntary change in category (now former spouse) terminated his previous coverage (spouse).
3. Although his former spouse is now deceased and he currently has no SBP beneficiary, regrettably, the voluntary change he made in 1993 (to former spouse coverage) terminated his prior election (spouse coverage). His next possible opportunity to effect a change in coverage is during an Open Season. It is unclear when Congress will authorize an Open Season, but he is advised to read Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published, and now online, to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army. If Congress establishes another SBP Open Enrollment Season, Army Echoes will give guidance on how to enroll his spouse in the SBP.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ____x___ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140003363
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140003363
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008137
The applicant requests correction of his records to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from former spouse to spouse coverage. The available evidence indicates at the time of his retirement in 1981 the applicant was married to Karan and he elected spouse and dependent children SBP coverage based on the full amount of his retired pay. The divorce decree he provides obligated him to change his SBP election to former spouse SBP coverage, which he did.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014150
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 May 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140014150 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. c. His Marriage License, which shows he married his current spouse on 13 September 1996. d. An Indiana State Department of Health Certificate of Death showing his former spouse died on 18 May 2013. e. A letter from DFAS, dated 5 December 2013, that states an adjustment was made to the SBP portion of his retired pay account. The applicant's request that he be permitted to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018531
He was single at the time and he made an SBP election for children only coverage. Therefore, as a matter of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he enrolled his spouse in the SBP within 1 year of his marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant made a voluntary change in his SBP election from child only to spouse and child on 10 July 2008 and that the request...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019074
A letter from DFAS to the applicant, dated 22 September 2014, stated an adjustment was made to the SBP portion of his retired pay account. The applicant provides: a. A death certificate showing the death of his former spouse on 30 August 2014. c. Letter from DFAS which essentially states: * this was a response to the applicant's inquiry regarding the election of SBP for his current spouse * DFAS was unable to process the applicant's request because the laws governing SBP did not permit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022330
After a period of divorce, they remarried in 2010 and remained married until his death in 2013. A review of the FSM's records indicated the FSM elected not to participate in the SBP upon his retirement in 1987. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a voluntary change in election from "former spouse and child" coverage to "spouse and child" coverage on 1 June 2010 (the first day of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007567
On 14 May 1996, the applicant and the FSM were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement (or during an open-season election prior to his/her divorce), or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021457
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage and designated her as the annuitant of the SBP. On 15 May 1999, the FSM married the applicant. There are no documents in the available record, or provided by the applicant, that shows the FSM ever made an election to participate in the SBP within 1 year of his remarriage or during an Open Season enrollment period.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003619C070205
The applicant provides a DA Form 5002 (SBP Election); the FSM’s Alimony Support Statement; a General Power of Attorney; a DFAS-CL Form 5890-2 (Designation of Beneficiary Information); the FSM’s Retiree Account Statement; the FSM’s Last Will and Testament; the FSM’s and the applicant’s joint bank account statement; an Assignment of Proceeds of Insurance with a listing of funeral expenses; a divorce decree; and the FSM’s Certificate of Death. There is no evidence that either the FSM or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013050
The evidence of record shows that at the time of his retirement, the FSM elected not to participate in the SBP for spouse coverage. Neither the applicant nor the FSM made a former spouse election within one year of the divorce as required by law. The FSMs death certificate indicates that the FSM was remarried after he and the applicant divorced; therefore, SBP benefits shifted to the beneficiary category in effect at the FSMs time of death, his widow, D, if they had been married for at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013553
There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, although the 1983 divorce decree did not entitle her to make a request for a deemed election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. But neither...