Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008070
Original file (20140008070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  6 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008070 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was stationed in Cam Ranh Bay, South Vietnam during the period of 20 June to
5 August 1971 before being assigned to the 317th Maintenance Company. 

2.  The applicant states that his records do not show that he arrived in Cam Ranh Bay, South Vietnam on 20 June 1971 and remained there on guard duty until
5 August 1971 when he was assigned to the 317th Maintenance Company. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 July 1970 for a period of
3 years and training as a switchboard operator.  He completed his basic training and his advanced individual training before being transferred to Germany on       8 January 1971.

3.  On 4 June 1971, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He had served 10 months and 5 days of total active service.

4.  On 5 June 1971, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and assignment to Vietnam.  He departed Germany on 21 June 1971 with orders directing him to report to the U.S. Army Vietnam Transit Detachment, Army Post Office San Francisco (APO SF) 96384.  APO SF 96384 was the postal code for Tan Son Nhut Air Base, South Vietnam.

5.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on or about 1 August 1971.  On 6 August 1971, he was assigned to the 317th Maintenance Company where he remained until he departed Vietnam on 12 March 1972 as a patient and was transferred to the medical holding Company at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.  The record is silent as to the reason for his early departure as a patient.

6.  The applicant was assigned to a signal team in Arlington Heights, Illinois until he was discharged on 24 May 1974.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim he served on guard duty for 15 days while in Cam Ranh Bay awaiting his assignment to the 317th Maintenance Company is not in doubt, there is no evidence of record and he provides none to confirm this.
 
2.  The evidence of record shows that he had orders transferring him to the transient detachment at Tan Son Nhut Air Base, South Vietnam and the applicant has not provided evidence to show otherwise, and his next assignment was with the 317th Maintenance Company.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show otherwise, there appears to be no basis to granting his request to show assignment to Cam Ranh Bay, South Vietnam.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008070





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008070



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019976

    Original file (20130019976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction of records to show he performed temporary duty (TDY) in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show he performed TDY in the RVN during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966 was carefully reconsidered. However, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his records to show this period of foreign service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001807

    Original file (20130001807.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Western Union telegram and the award certificate which show the applicant was wounded in action on 4 June 1970 in Vietnam are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base adding the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214. The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004727

    Original file (20130004727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record is void of evidence that shows he was wounded in action or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. His service record is void of evidence which shows he was assigned to this unit in Vietnam and this entry does not include the date he sustained the injury.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10018-09

    Original file (10018-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show his “service in country at Cam Rahn [sic] Bay, Vietnam during the period July-68-Dec-68". That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he served the ground in Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam, for one or more days during the period from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01582

    Original file (BC-2010-01582.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that neither the evidence of record nor the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR) substantiates that he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence in the form of eyewitness statements, travel vouchers, or letters of evaluation to substantiate his eligibility for award of the VSM, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01561

    Original file (BC 2014 01561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01561 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating that after a thorough review of the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018543

    Original file (20110018543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to the 8th Signal Detachment on 7 July 1969 (redesignated as the 317th Maintenance Company on 1 December 1969) to 21 June 1970 * item 38, he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings through his service * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the: * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028504

    Original file (20100028504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Section 4 of his DA Form 24 (Service Record). The applicant states his DA Form 24, section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service), lines 18 through 20, are in error. This record documents his active duty service from 14 September 1956 through 13 September 1962, and shows no assignment to Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089754C070403

    Original file (2003089754C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error, which does not require action by the Board. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017032

    Original file (20080017032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service record awarding him the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In the absence of military records which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence...