Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019762
Original file (20110019762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:  3 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019762 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he should have received the Purple Heart for a head injury he received from shrapnel at LZ (Landing Zone) Dottie in Vietnam in September 1968.  He did not have proof of the incident until he contacted the medic who treated him in 1968.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a witness statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 5 September 1967.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 12B (Combat Engineer).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 38 (Record of Assignment) he was assigned to Company B, 
39th Engineer Battalion (Vietnam) from 14 February 1968 through 2 February 1969; and 

	b.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the Purple Heart is not listed.

4.  On 5 September 1969, he was released from active duty, in the rank of specialist four/E-4.  He had completed 2 years of net service this period. 

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not list the Purple Heart.

6.  His medical records are not available for review with this case and his name is not shown in the Vietnam Casualty Listing.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command failed to reveal orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.

8.  In support of his request he provides a statement, dated 20 August 2011, from an individual who states he was a company medic who treated the applicant for a head wound during August or September 1968.  He states that during the early morning hours the LZ came under mortar and small arms attack.  He recalls the applicant appeared at the aid station suffering from a head wound.  Examination showed it to be a shrapnel injury to the top center rear of the head.  He treated the applicant and he wanted to evacuate him.  But the applicant refused evacuation and returned to his squad.  Examination of the wound over the next few days showed no signs of infection.  He believes the lack of a record of the incident stems from the fact that the applicant refused evacuation and was treated entirely at company level.    



9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  ADCARS does not contain orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant and the Vietnam Casualty Listing does not contain the applicant's name. 

2.  Notwithstanding his sincerity or that of the witness in the absence of official evidence showing he was treated for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy and that treatment was made a matter of official record, there is regrettably an insufficient basis upon which to award the Purple Heart. 

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION 

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110012948



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019762



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012860

    Original file (20060012860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Throughout the day, Company A took intense fire. The applicant provided sufficient new evidence to show he was awarded the CIB. The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was treated for these wounds.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017612

    Original file (20090017612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are limited medical records in the applicant's file. There is no evidence available to support the applicant's request: * there are no medical records to show he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action * his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40 * his name is not on the Vietnam Casualty Roster 3. A separation physical failed to note a head wound and the applicant, on his SF 89, said "was hit on head by a piece of metal" instead of saying he received a shrapnel wound to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010945

    Original file (20140010945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40. c. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart. He provides a document titled Rating Decision, dated 13 July 1971, which appears to be from VA. On the document it essentially states: * the applicant made a claim for service-connection for shrapnel wounds * available medical records did not show any treatment for shrapnel wounds but his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018517

    Original file (20080018517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 June 1969. The applicant's contention that he was wounded in the Republic of Vietnam and the supporting witness statement he submitted were carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003736,

    Original file (20140003736,.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form lists all the awards shown on his DD Form 214 and includes the Air Medal (2nd Award) and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Notwithstanding item 40 of an SF 88 contained in the applicant's record, wherein he stated he sustained shrapnel wounds, and the statements provided by two former members of his unit, the evidence does not sufficiently show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003736

    Original file (20140003736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form lists all the awards shown on his DD Form 214 and includes the Air Medal (2nd Award) and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Notwithstanding item 40 of an SF 88 contained in the applicant's record, wherein he stated he sustained shrapnel wounds, and the statements provided by two former members of his unit, the evidence does not sufficiently show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962

    Original file (20070012962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004382

    Original file (20110004382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant submits a Bronze Star Medal Certificate which shows he received it for meritorious achievement in ground operations against hostile forces during the period July 1968 to July 1969. There are also no orders in his record awarding him the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021351

    Original file (20120021351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * a self-authored statement * a letter to a MOC * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings * 2 letters from the VA * VA Rating Decision CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is...