Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007583
Original file (20140007583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	    6 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140007583 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his discharge under other than honorable conditions from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to show he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability.  He also requests restoration of his rank to private first class (PFC)/E-3.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was originally injured in basic training that caused a permanent disability and affects his quality of life to this day
* he was separated from the USAR for unsatisfactory reporting due to an injury he sustained from a motor vehicle accident for which he had been medically released from duty  

3.  The applicant provides:

* medical records
* DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile)
* 11 DD Forms 689 (Individual Sick Slip)
* separation orders
 
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 9 December 2008 for a period of 8 years.  His Reserve Annex to his enlistment contract informed him that he must keep his commander advised of his current mailing address, where he will received official correspondence, and that he must reply to and comply with all official orders and correspondence that he may receive.  It also informed him that if he failed to participate satisfactorily he could be declared an unsatisfactory participant and could be subject to separation from the Selected Reserve or the Ready Reserve either by reassignment or discharged, which may result in a pay grade reduction and an other than honorable characterization of his military service.  He attained the rank of PFC.

2.  He provided a DA Form 3349, dated 9 December 2009, which shows he was issued a temporary physical profile rating of 3 for lower extremities due to hip pain.

3.  He provided medical documentation, dated January 2010, which shows he treated for an abscess on his right buttocks.

4.  In April 2012, he was notified via mail of his pending USAR discharge for unsatisfactory participation under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13.  The memorandum states the reason for the proposed action was his unexcused absence from nine or more unit training assemblies or his absence from extended combat training.

5.  His notification packet was returned to his unit unopened.  The envelope was marked "Not Deliverable as Addressed."

6.  Headquarters, 88th Regional Support Command, Orders 12-193-00033, dated 11 July 2012, show he was reduced from PFC to private one (PV1) effective 11 July 2012 and he was discharged from the USAR on 18 July 2012 under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178.  His character of service was under other than honorable conditions.

7.  Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the USAR and Army National Guard.

	a.  Chapter 13 applies to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.  The characterization of service normally will be under other than honorable conditions. 

	b.  Paragraph 2-9a provides that an honorable characterization of service is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for military personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 2-9b provides that a general characterization of service is appropriate if a Soldier's service has been honest and faithful.  Characterization of service as general under honorable conditions is warranted when significant negative aspects of the Soldier's conduct or performance of duty outweigh positive aspects of the Soldier's military record.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  It states that the mere presence of impairment does not, of itself, justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability.

9.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his/her office, rank, grade, or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends he should have been honorably discharged by reason of physical disability, there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence which shows he was unable to perform his military duties at the time of his discharge from the USAR on 18 July 2012.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he was eligible for physical disability processing and there is no basis for a physical disability discharge.

2.  The evidence of record shows he was discharged under other than honorable conditions from the USAR in the rank of PV1 for unsatisfactory participation.  His record of service was not satisfactory and did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to reinstate his rank to PFC.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007583



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007583



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018207

    Original file (20120018207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Orders 11-096-00021, issued by Headquarters, 81st Regional Support Command, Fort Jackson, SC, dated 6 April 2011: a. reduced the FSM from SFC/E-7 to private (PVT/E-1) effective 6 April 2011 under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 10-15; and b. discharged the FSM from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007031

    Original file (20120007031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to honorable due to physical disability. Orders Number D-03-901165, dated 6 March 1984, discharged the applicant, in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 from the IRR with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The available evidence of record indicates a board of officers determined in March 1982 that the applicant's unsatisfactory...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012670

    Original file (AR20130012670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on 31 January 2008, for a period of 8 years. The evidence of record shows that on 14 April 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for his absences, with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021764

    Original file (20090021764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Headquarters, 99th Regional Readiness Command, Orders 04-328-00059, dated 23 November 2004, directed the applicant be: a. reduced from SGT to PV1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), paragraph 7-12a, effective 20 November 2004, and b. discharged under honorable conditions from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075494C070403

    Original file (2002075494C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The board recommended that...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014497

    Original file (AR20130014497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled inactive duty training during a one year period, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 19 May 2012, the unit commander recommended separation from the US Army Reserve (USAR). Finally,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004748

    Original file (20120004748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. However, his VA rated disabilities do...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021487

    Original file (20100021487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to either a general under honorable conditions discharge or a fully honorable discharge. He attests that he has not received any type of DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) stating his discharge and that all he received was an email from his unit administrator informing him he was discharged in May 2008. On 21 July 2008, he submitted a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011388C071029

    Original file (20060011388C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD). There is no indication in the applicant's record that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. Characterization of service normally will be UOTHC; however, the commander may authorize a GD if it is warranted based on the member's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011695

    Original file (20090011695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence to show that the applicant ever applied to the ADRB for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the show that the administrative separation processing and/or procedures were flawed, there appears to be no basis to grant his requested relief.