Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007154
Original file (20140007154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF.

		BOARD DATE: 25 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140007154


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's military records as follows: 

* to show the FSM was awarded two battle stars for his service in Marseilles, France
* documentation to verify he held the rank of technical sergeant for duties served
* all back pay as a T/4 from September 1944 through December 1945

2.  The applicant states his father's records should be corrected to show the battle stars and his rank during his service in World War II (WWII).

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* the FSM's handwritten document indicating some of his WWII service
* FSM's death certificate
* Applicant's birth certificate
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-530 (Application for Burial Benefits
* National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter, dated 27 December 2012 with copies of the FSM's records


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM's military records were not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the NPRC in 1973.  It is believed his records were lost in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The FSM's records show he:

	a.  was inducted on 6 March 1943;

	b.  held the rank of sergeant (SGT) at separation; 

	c.  served in the following battles, engagements, expeditions:  Rome-Arno, Northern Apennines, and Po Valley;

	d.  was awarded two Overseas Service Bars, American Campaign Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with three bronze service stars, Army Good Conduct Medal, and the World War II Victory Medal; and 
 
	e.  was discharged on 12 December 1945.

4.  The FSM's handwritten document shows he was assigned to the 288th Ordnance Company as a tank mechanic, was made a "Buck" SGT and the unit was awarded three bronze service stars.  He was sent to Marseilles, France and attached to 7th Army in a Tank Transportation Company.  He remained a "Buck" SGT.  The unit was redesignated the 228th Tank Transportation Company.

5.  A 27 December 2012 NPRC letter shows the FSM is authorized the Army Good Conduct Medal, American Campaign Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with three bronze service stars, World War II Victory Medal, Honorable Service Lapel Button WWII, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun and Pistol Bars. 

6.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) does not list any campaign designation for Marseilles.  It credits the 228th Tank Transportation Company with participation in three campaigns (Rome-Arno, Northern Apennines, and Po Valley).

7.  The Enlisted Grade Structure of the Army from 1 September 1942 prior to      1 August 1948 shows that both SGT and Technician 4th Class (T/4) were both pay grade 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no available evidence showing the applicant held the rank of technical sergeant, T/4.  His records show he was a SGT at his discharge.  In any case, both SGT and T/4 were paid at the same rate, pay grade 4.

2.  The governing publication does not list a campaign designation for Marseilles, France and credits the FSM's unit with participation in three campaigns.

3.  In view of the above, the request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
 I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000710



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007154



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076696C070215

    Original file (2002076696C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the absence of evidence to explain either wounding, the Board will assume for purposes of correcting his records, that he was wounded on both 17 July and 8 August 1944, and award him a Purple Heart for each wound. Consequently, there is no basis for the Board to consider awarding him the POW Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart with 1 st Oak Leaf Cluster, for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075353C070403

    Original file (2002075353C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows the applicant received campaign credit for the Naples-Foggia Campaign; therefore, this portion of the applicant’s request for campaign credit for “Naples” will not be discussed further in this Memorandum of Consideration. Evidence of record also shows that the applicant’s records were corrected to show award of the EAME Campaign Medal with four bronze service stars as evidenced by the DD Form 215, dated 24 March 1994. There is no evidence of record available to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010461

    Original file (20100010461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of hospital admission data in the SGO files did not reveal any records indicating the FSM received a shrapnel wound to his knee or that he was otherwise wounded as a result of enemy action. The newspaper clipping shows the FSM was entitled to wear the insignia for the Meritorious Service Unit Plaque (later renamed the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC)) and was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, and five battle stars. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011547

    Original file (20120011547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction to his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show the American Campaign Medal and Meritorious Unit Commendation. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019197

    Original file (20090019197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence in the applicant's available military service records that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. * The applicant contended that the shrapnel located in the jaw regions on the right side of his face and mouth originated from a shrapnel wound which he sustained during World War II while serving as a combat infantryman.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003390C070208

    Original file (20040003390C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides in support of his request: a. WD AGO Form 55 (Military Record and Report of Separation Certificate of Service), issued on 18 October 1944. b. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. c. Issuing the individual a DD Form 215 for the period of service ending on 18 October 1944 to show award of the BSM, five bronze service stars to be worn on the EAME Campaign Medal, and the bronze arrowhead.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077587C070215

    Original file (2002077587C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show he received credit for participation in the Anzio campaign. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal as an authorized award. Based on the applicant's participation in five campaigns during World War II, he is entitled to one silver service star to be affixed to his European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal and correction of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003777

    Original file (20120003777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show award of the Soldier's Medal, Purple Heart, and any other authorized awards. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased father be corrected to show award of the Soldier's Medal, Purple Heart, and any other authorized awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016524

    Original file (20100016524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show an additional bronze service star on his European-African-Middle Eastern (EAME) Campaign Medal for combat in Germany. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082727C070215

    Original file (2002082727C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that he was not awarded this "battle star". Since the applicant has received credit for participation in two campaigns during his assignment in the European-African-Middle Eastern Theater of Operations, he is entitled to two bronze service stars for wear on his European-African-Middle...