Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006582
Original file (20140006582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  20 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140006582 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM).

2.  The applicant states:

* prior to his retirement on 31 May 1982, his last duty assignment was with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) with duty at the U.S. American Embassy, The Hague, Netherlands
* he was recommended for award of the DMSM and he received it in the mail sometime in June, July, or August 1982
* he sent the general orders awarding him the DMSM to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) for inclusion in his records, but he failed to keep a copy for himself
* he has the engraved medal but no citation or order
* the DMSM was not in his records when he queried NPRC
* he contacted the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Awards and Decorations Branch at Fort Knox, KY – this office could not help him and referred him to the Department of Defense who also could not help him
* the simple solution is to obtain a copy of the general orders, dated May, June, July, or August 1982, and send it to NPRC to correct his records

3.  The applicant provides:

* email
* self-authored letter, dated 20 April 2014
* DIA Form 420 (Recommendation for Award)
* DMSM Citation

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having prior periods of honorable enlisted service in the Regular Army, the applicant was appointed as a warrant officer one in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 February 1976 and entered active duty.

3.  Having sufficient service for retirement, the applicant was honorably retired on 31 May 1982.

4.  The applicant provided a self-authored letter and email showing his attempts to obtain a copy of the general orders awarding him the DMSM.  He also provided a copy of the DIA Form 420, dated 25 February 1982, and DMSM Citation showing he was recommended for award of the DMSM.  His DIA Form 420 does not show the medal was approved or disapproved.

5.  His records are void of any evidence showing he was recommended for or awarded the DMSM.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the DMSM is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after 3 November 1977, distinguished themselves by noncombat meritorious achievement or service.

7.  Department of Defense Directive 1348.33M (Manual of Military Decorations and Awards:  General Information, Medal of Honor, and Defense/Joint Decorations and Awards) states any of the Defense/Joint decorations may be awarded upon the retirement or separation of an eligible Service member.  The DMSM is the third highest Defense/Joint peacetime award.  Recommendations for the DMSM shall be submitted to the appropriate approval authority for processing.  In those instances where the approval authority rests with the Director of Administration and Management or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the recommendation shall be submitted for processing to the Director, Military Personnel, Human Resources Directorate, White House Services, or the Director, Joint Staff, no later than 90 days before the desired presentation date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his records to show award of the DMSM was carefully considered.

2.  Although the applicant provided a copy of his recommendation and citation for award of the DMSM, his records are void of and he failed to provide any evidence showing he was approved for award of the DMSM.

3.  Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was approved for award of the DMSM, there is insufficient evidence upon which to grant the requested relief.

4.  The Board is not an investigative body.  It considers evidence brought before it and evidence readily available in an applicant's personnel records.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006582



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006582



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003514

    Original file (20150003514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003514 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The DIA Form 420 he provided does not indicate whether the award was approved or disapproved and his military records do not contain any indication he was recommended for and awarded the DMSM. The previously provided award recommendation and proposed citation do not show the award was approved and general orders awarding him the DMSM are not available.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009117

    Original file (20120009117.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant provides the following: * Self-authored statement * DD Form 214 * JSAM Orders * Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Form 420 (Recommendation for Award of the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, JSAM, and Certificate of Achievement) * JSAM Citation * DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028997

    Original file (20100028997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) includes a BSM Certificate which shows this medal was awarded to him for exceptionally meritorious service during OIF for the period 1 September 2005 to 21 November 2006. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019022

    Original file (20100019022.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Office of the Secretary of Defense, Military Personnel Awards Order Number 09-229, dated 28 September 2009, shows the applicant received the DMSM for the period October 2007 to October 2009. There are no orders for the eighth award of the Good Conduct Medal in the available records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the eighth award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 October 2006...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002068

    Original file (20070002068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that her discharge document should be corrected to show award of the Defense Meritorious Service Medal and a VA disability rating of 40 percent because the DMSM and VA disability rating were received after her DD Form 214 was signed and, therefore, are not recorded on her discharge document. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004488

    Original file (20120004488.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty) to show award of the: * Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM) * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) 2. The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2166-7 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) ending in November 1994 * DA Form 2166-7 (NCOER) ending in September 1997 * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 18 July...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03607

    Original file (BC-2011-03607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant subsequently sought out his commander at the time to request he be recommended for award of the LOM for his distinguished actions in the mission to rescue the American captive. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the advisory opinion, the applicant provides signed, dated, and notarized recommendation for award of the LOM, as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017554

    Original file (20100017554.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests correction of the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter he received, dated 14 June 2010, to show he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal with 2 bronze oak leaf clusters, Air Medal with Numeral 10, and the Basic Army Aviator Badge. Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) for this period, as corrected by a DD Form 215, dated 12 August 2009, shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Army of Occupation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010764

    Original file (20110010764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service in Afghanistan and his Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM). The available evidence shows he served a qualifying period of service for award of the Afghanistan Campaign Medal with one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the Defense Meritorious...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02097

    Original file (BC-2003-02097.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The decoration was awarded to the applicant by Special Order GJ-091, dated 30 Jun 03, which was after the CY02C board. Neither the citation nor the special order for this award correctly identifies the JSAM as the second, or 1OLC, award. Accordingly, we do not recommend SSB consideration for the CY02C board with this decoration on file, as it did not exist at the time of that board, although we do suggest the applicant have the special order and citation for the JSAM amended through...