Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005058
Original file (20140005058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  18 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005058 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show:

* his rank/grade as captain (CPT)/O-3 instead of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2
* his date of discharge as 1 May 1979 instead of 17 September 1973

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 should show the effective date when he was officially discharged and the rank he held at that time.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Honorable Discharge Certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank/grade of second lieutenant on 3 August 1970.

3.  Headquarters, Third U.S. Army, Letter Orders AR-08-1552, dated 24 August 1970, ordered the applicant to active duty for a period of 2 years.  On
18 September 1970, the applicant entered an active duty status.

4.  On 13 October 1970, the applicant submitted a request to extend his retention on active duty.  On 11 December 1970, his request was approved with an effective date of 18 September 1972.

5.  On 18 September 1971, the applicant was promoted to the rank of 1LT.

6.  On 17 September 1973, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  Item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 show his rank/grade as 1LT/O-2.

7.  U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center Orders 08-88941, dated 10 August 1976, show the applicant was relieved from the USAR Control Group (Standby) on 10 August 1976 and assigned to the Inactive Reserve.

8.  On 25 January 1979, he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer to the rank/grade of CPT/O-3 effective 25 January 1979.

9.  The applicant provided copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate that shows he was honorably discharged on 1 May 1979 in the rank/grade of 
CPT/O-3.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  Instructions stated to enter the active duty grade of rank and pay grade at the time of separation in item 5a and item 5b.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as CPT/O-3 and REFRAD date as 1 May 1979 was carefully considered.

2.  Records show the applicant was ordered to active duty on 18 September 1970 and REFRAD on 17 September 1973.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

3.  Records show he was not promoted to CPT until 1979, several years after the issuance of his DD Form 214.  The governing regulation stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  ___X_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005058



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005058



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023324

    Original file (20100023324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), to show his rank as captain (CPT). He was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of CPT effective 13 December 1973. In accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, he was released from active duty in the rank of 1LT/pay grade O-2 with a date of rank of 1 September 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023243

    Original file (20110023243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 29 August 1968 through 13 August 1970 and held the rank of 1LT at the time of his release from active duty. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017692

    Original file (20110017692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His promotion to CPT was never listed on his DD Form 214 as he believed it would be. Item 6 (Date of Rank) of his DD Form 214 lists his date of rank as 11 July 1970. The applicant's DA Form 66, orders, and documents in his record confirm he was promoted to the rank/pay grade of 1LT/O-2 with a date of rank of 11 July 1970 and this is the rank he held on the date of his release from active duty on 24 April 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000414

    Original file (20140000414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Special Orders Number 229, dated 29 November 1971 made a grade determination affecting his promotion status in the Army of the United States (AUS) to show his rank as CPT with a date of rank of 8 August 1971. The applicant's request to correct his DD Form 214 to show his date of rank to CPT as 26 May 1971 instead of 26 May 1973 has been carefully examined. Item 30 clearly identifies the applicant was appointed the temporary rank of CPT in the AUS on 8 August 1971; however, he held the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012600

    Original file (20140012600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Letter Orders Number D-5-967, issued by Office of the Adjutant General on 27 May 1971, ordered his retirement in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 and placement on the TDRL with a combined rating of 90 percent, effective 7 June 1971. Medical facility commanders may consider patients for promotion under the normal promotion criteria of this chapter, together with the following guidance: (1) Individuals with recommended-list status for promotion to pay grade E-5 or E-6 resulting from selection by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009937

    Original file (20100009937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009937 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s record also contains the following documents prepared during his separation processing, all dated 29 May 1970, that list his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5: * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005525

    Original file (20140005525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 6 August 1962, to show his rank/grade as captain (CPT)/O-3 vice first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in: * Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - 1LT/O-2 * Item 3b (Date of Rank) - 1 November 1959 * Item 32 (Remarks) - Temporary 1LT,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008465

    Original file (20090008465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that the highest military pay grade he held was O-3 with at least 4 years and 1 day of active duty service (or more than 1,460 retirement points) and a total of 2,920 points for retired pay as an enlisted/warrant officer. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show he was placed on the retire list in the rank of CPT/pay grade O-3 and authorized retired pay in that grade effective 3 March 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008374

    Original file (20100008374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. Evidence of record shows the applicant was a specialist four at the time of his release from active duty on 23 April 1971, which is properly reflected in items 5a and 5b of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 April 1971. Since the applicant was promoted to sergeant after his release from active duty on 23 April 1971, there is no basis for amending items 5a or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018834

    Original file (20140018834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * two DA Forms 2496-1 (Disposition Form) * DA Form 3355-R (Promotion Points Worksheet) * Unit Orders Number 52 * DD Form 214 (2 copies) * DA Form 1577 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A DA Form 2496-1, dated 23 September 1970, wherein the applicant's company commander recommended the applicant be considered for promotion to the rank of SSG/E-6 in the recommended MOS of 11B4G. His DA Form 20 shows in: * Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) the...