Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017692
Original file (20110017692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017692 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank as captain (CPT) instead of first lieutenant (1LT).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he saw the orders promoting him to the rank of CPT in May 1975, but they were lost.  His promotion to CPT was never listed on his DD Form 214 as he believed it would be.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam and received a Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service, a Combat Infantryman Badge, and other awards and decorations.  He further states he received the promotion and there would be no cost to the government to make the correction since it should have been annotated on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* memorandum, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri, dated 19 July 1974, subject:  Promotion Consideration in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)
* Special Orders Number 103, Headquarters, Fifth U.S. Army, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, dated 28 May 1975

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank/grade of second lieutenant/O-1 on 11 July 1969, assigned to the infantry branch, and ordered to active duty.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) contains an entry in item 12 (Appointments) which shows he was promoted to the rank/pay grade of 1LT/O-2 on 11 July 1970.

4.  The applicant's record also contains Special Orders Number 192, dated 11 July 1970, Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, which promote him to the rank/grade of 1LT/O-2 with a date of rank of 11 July 1970.

5.  On 24 April 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) after completing 1 year, 9 months, and 14 days of active military service.  Item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 list his rank/grade as 1LT/O-2.  Item 6 (Date of Rank) of his DD Form 214 lists his date of rank as 11 July 1970.

6.  His record contains and the applicant provides Special Orders Number 103, dated 28 May 1975, issued by Headquarters, Fifth U.S. Army.  These orders directed the applicant's honorable discharge from the USAR "Ready" [Ready Reserve].  The reason for discharge is listed as unqualified resignation.  The applicant's rank/pay grade is shown as 1LT/O-2 in the standard name line.

7.  The applicant provides and his record contains a memorandum, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 19 July 1974, subject:  Promotion Consideration in the USAR, dated 19 July 1974, which indicates the applicant was considered by a standby advisory board using the criteria established for 1974.  The applicant was recommended for promotion to the rank of CPT.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time stated to list the rank and pay grade held upon separation in items 5a and 5b.  It also identified the DA Form 66, orders, and documents in the record as the source records for these entries.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank as CPT instead of 1LT has been carefully considered and found to be without merit.

2.  The applicant's DA Form 66, orders, and documents in his record confirm he was promoted to the rank/pay grade of 1LT/O-2 with a date of rank of 11 July 1970 and this is the rank he held on the date of his release from active duty on 24 April 1971.  His DD Form 214 correctly shows his rank/grade as 1LT/O-2.

3.  It appears he was promoted to CPT in 1975.  However, that promotion would not have been reflected on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 April 1971.

4.  Notwithstanding the applicant's service and/or his sincerity, there is no correction to be made in this case in view of the foregoing evidence and the applicant is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION









BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017692



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017692



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023324

    Original file (20100023324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), to show his rank as captain (CPT). He was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of CPT effective 13 December 1973. In accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, he was released from active duty in the rank of 1LT/pay grade O-2 with a date of rank of 1 September 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005058

    Original file (20140005058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as CPT/O-3 and REFRAD date as 1 May 1979 was carefully considered. Records show the applicant was ordered to active duty on 18 September 1970 and REFRAD on 17 September 1973. Records show he was not promoted to CPT until 1979, several years after the issuance of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000414

    Original file (20140000414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Special Orders Number 229, dated 29 November 1971 made a grade determination affecting his promotion status in the Army of the United States (AUS) to show his rank as CPT with a date of rank of 8 August 1971. The applicant's request to correct his DD Form 214 to show his date of rank to CPT as 26 May 1971 instead of 26 May 1973 has been carefully examined. Item 30 clearly identifies the applicant was appointed the temporary rank of CPT in the AUS on 8 August 1971; however, he held the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023243

    Original file (20110023243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 29 August 1968 through 13 August 1970 and held the rank of 1LT at the time of his release from active duty. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010566C071029

    Original file (20060010566C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of the application: Death Certificate; Separation Documents (DD Forms 214), dated 9 August 1967 and 10 June 1969; Officer Qualification Record (DA Form 66), dated 20 December 1968; and United States Army Reserve (USAR) Discharge Orders, dated 17 April 1974. The documents and records submitted by the applicant with the application coincide with the records and documents on file in the FSM's record, and all show his rank as 1LT. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013559

    Original file (20070013559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends if he had been promoted to LTC with a date of rank of 24 June 1983, it would have given him the time in grade and the active duty service requirement to retire in the grade of LTC. The opinion continues that the applicant's promotion eligibility date to LTC was 23 September 1989, however, he was appointed a warrant officer on 24 June 1988 and was not eligible for promotion consideration to LTC. Additionally, the applicant contends that his records should show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016902

    Original file (20130016902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Special Orders Number 128, issued by Headquarters, 2nd Infantry Division, Korea promoted him to first lieutenant (1LT) with an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 8 May 1970. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty in Korea from 4 April 1970 to 21 November 1970, a period of 7 months and 17 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007145

    Original file (20080007145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds, in effect, that it was a failure of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to promote him to 1LT with a date of rank concurrent with his Army National Guard (ARNG) appointment of 13 April 1953. The applicant also states, in effect, that another error was made when he was non-selected for promotion to CPT. Item 12 (Appointments) of the applicant's DA Form 66, Officer Qualification Record, shows he was promoted to 1LT in the Army of the United States effective 19 August 1951; to 1LT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019484

    Original file (20100019484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, item 42 (Remarks) of his DA Form 20 shows that on 29 April 1970, he was released from OCS for lack of leadership potential under the provisions of Army Regulation 351-5 (United States Army Officer Candidate School). Although he provided correspondence which stated he was performing duties normally performed by a commissioned officer, there is no indication he was commissioned or held the rank of CPT/O-3 at anytime during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012600

    Original file (20140012600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Letter Orders Number D-5-967, issued by Office of the Adjutant General on 27 May 1971, ordered his retirement in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 and placement on the TDRL with a combined rating of 90 percent, effective 7 June 1971. Medical facility commanders may consider patients for promotion under the normal promotion criteria of this chapter, together with the following guidance: (1) Individuals with recommended-list status for promotion to pay grade E-5 or E-6 resulting from selection by a...