Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005006
Original file (20140005006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005006 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect correction of his record to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states that during his retirement processing he declined SBP coverage.  His wife sent in the information that she received and they were told the information was not received by the SBP office.

3.  The applicant provides a notarized letter from his wife.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant retired from the Regular Army on 28 February 2014, in the rank of sergeant first class, after completing more than 21 years of active service.

2.  During the processing of this case, on 7 April 2014, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirmed the applicant's retired account was still not established and appeared to be missing a valid SBP election.  DFAS provided the following documentation:

   a.  DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) that the applicant signed on 18 December 2013.  The form shows the following:

* Section VIII (Dependency Information) lists his spouse as the same individual completing the notarized letter of concurrence
* Section IX (SBP Election) shows he completed item 26 (Beneficiary Category(ies)) electing not to participate in SBP and he indicated he had eligible dependents under the plan
* Section XI (Certification) shows the form was certified on 18 December 2013
* Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) does not show his spouse concurred with his SBP election

   b.  On 5 March 2014, the official who certified his DD Form 2656 stated that on 18 December 2013 a letter was sent by certified mail to the applicant's spouse.  This letter provided information concerning the SBP to assist the applicant's spouse in making her decision to concur or non-concur with the applicant's decision not to participate in the SBP.  The letter explained the options available and the effects of those options and that retired pay stops on the day the retiree dies.  The official stated that as of the date of the statement, a signed copy of the letter to acknowledge receipt had not been received by that office, nor had concurrence been provided.  Certified mail receipts pertaining to this correspondence were attached.  The evidence indicates the applicant's spouse signed for the certified mail on 4 January 2014.

3.  The applicant submits a notarized letter from his wife, dated 17 March 2014.  In this letter, she indicates that she agrees with the applicant's decision not to participate in SBP.

4.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse coverage (or child only coverage, if applicable). 

5.  Public Law 99-145, enacted on 8 November 1985, but effective 1 March 1986, requires a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed a DD Form 2656 on 18 December 2013, more than 2 months prior to his retirement.  He elected not to participate in the SBP.  The evidence indicates his spouse failed to properly concur with his SBP election in a timely manner.  Therefore, coverage automatically defaulted to full spouse coverage.

2.  There is no evidence of error in this case.  However, in light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate as a matter of equity to correct his record to show his spouse submitted her concurrence with his election not to participate in the SBP prior to his retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* showing his spouse properly concurred with his election not to participate in the SBP in a timely manner
* showing the election was received, approved, and timely processed
* reimbursing any SBP premiums he may have paid as a result of the above corrections



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005006



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005006



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016683

    Original file (20130016683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant initially elected spouse only SBP coverage, was retired on 26 January 2011, and was placed on the TDRL on 27 January 2011. Here, it appears the applicant began having a panic attack due to his medical condition and felt pressured to agree to participate in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 electing not to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007159

    Original file (20130007159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section IV (Coverage), she elected Option A - I decline to make an election until age 60; c. Section VIII (Member Signature), the applicant and a witness signed the document on 11 April 2013; d. Section IX (Spouse Concurrence): (1) item 20 (Spouse), "I hereby consent in my spouse's RCSBP election as indicated. However, it appears the applicant's spouse was not notified of the applicant's election to decline SBP because there is no evidence of record that shows a spouse concurrence letter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017787

    Original file (20130017787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only, if applicable) coverage. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows the applicant's 20-year letter was dated 7 August 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018041

    Original file (20080018041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ABCMR analyst of record telephonically contacted the DFAS Retired Pay Office on 23 January 2009, which confirmed that the DD Form 2656, dated 10 July 2008 was not authenticated by the spouse on or after the date the applicant made his election. In a notarized statement, dated 27 January 2009, the applicant's spouse indicated that she had previously agreed with her husband's decision to not participate in the SBP and that she previously signed the one form provided by the Fort Drum, NY,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019757

    Original file (20140019757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant elected spouse and child (i.e. spouse only) coverage based on less than his full retirement pay. If she non-concurred with the applicant's election, the applicant would receive automatic spouse SBP full coverage. An election to decline to participate in the SBP or elect SBP in a reduced amount, must be made and have the spouse's concurrence made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001471

    Original file (20140001471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement. After he retired, on 30 August 2013, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and elected not to participate in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 2656 to show he and his spouse timely signed the form declining to participate in the SBP and the form was properly notarized; b. showing DFAS timely received and processed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001582

    Original file (20090001582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 9 July 2008, shows an SBP deduction of $268.84 for spouse only coverage, indicating that he was covered under the SBP for spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows that the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, not to participate in the SBP. The SBP spouse concurrence statement shows she concurred with his decision after the date he made that decision but not before he retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000166

    Original file (20140000166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her November 2013 Retiree Account Statement shows she currently has SBP coverage for spouse and children and she had made 16 payments toward her 360 months of paid-up SBP coverage. Because she retired by reason of sufficient active duty service for retirement, she made an SBP election in connection with this retirement wherein she elected not to participate in the SBP. The applicant retired on 31 July 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002692

    Original file (20090002692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant elected not to participate in spousal SBP coverage on 25 March 2008. It would, therefore, be just and equitable to show that the applicant elected not to participate in the SBP on 25 March 2008 with her spouse’s concurrence on 26 March 2008, and to correct her applicable records to show her DD Form 2656 was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005789

    Original file (20130005789.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. However, there would have been sufficient time prior to the applicant's retirement to obtain the correct address and advise the spouse of the options. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant timely completed a DD Form 2656 electing not to...