Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020133
Original file (20110020133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020133 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show:

* her name as "D____ M____ G____" vice "K____ R____ G____"
* her gender as "female" vice "male"

2.  The applicant states her present name is "D____ M____ G____" and she is female.  She needs her name and gender changed in her records as this issue causes significant problems with the treatment she receives at the Department of Veterans Affairs hospital.

3.  The applicant provides her DD Form 214 and a State order and certificate of name change.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  In conjunction with the applicant's enlistment in the Regular Army (RA), the applicant underwent a physical examination on 11 August 1983.  The Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) shows the applicant's name as "K____ R____ G____" and gender as "male."

3.  The applicant enlisted in the RA on 7 December 1983 and held military occupational specialty 11H (Heavy Anti-Armor Weapons Infantryman).  Item 1 (Name – Last, First, Middle) of the applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment/
Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) shows the name "K____ R____ G____."  The applicant authenticated this form by placing this name in the signature bock.

4.  The applicant's records contain various personnel, finance, medical, and other documents.  These documents include several DA Forms 2A (Personnel Qualification Record), an application for an identification card, assignment and promotions orders, separation orders, insurance documents, and various other documents that show the applicant's name as "K____ R____ G____" and gender as "male."  Several of these forms were authenticated by the applicant with a signature in the appropriate block using the name " K____ R____ G____."

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 6 December 1986 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  Item 1 (Name – Last, First, Middle) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the name "K____ R____ G____."

6.  The applicant provides a State order and certificate of name change, dated 23 September 2002, approving the applicant's name change to "D____ M____ G____."

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show:

* her name as "D____ M____ G____" vice "K____ R____ G____"
* her gender as "female" vice "male"

2.  The evidence of record shows upon the applicant's enlistment in the RA, the applicant's full name was listed as "K____ R____ G____" and gender as "male."  This full name and gender are consistent with the full name and gender on numerous documents in the applicant's service record throughout the applicant's military service.  The applicant did not use the requested name or gender during the applicant's military service.

3.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes.  The information in those records must reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of compelling information to the contrary, there is no basis for changing the applicant's full name or gender in this case.

4.  Nevertheless, a copy of this decisional document will be filed in the applicant's service records.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the different names and gender and adequately document the current name and gender in the applicant's record.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020133



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020133



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018390

    Original file (20100018390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009717

    Original file (20130009717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active Duty) to show to show her name as "S____ E____ R____." The applicant's records contain various personnel, finance, medical, and other documents that show the applicant's name as "J____ D____ R____" and gender as male. The applicant contends that her DD Form 214 should be modified to show her current name change as a result of gender reassignment surgery.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014882

    Original file (20130014882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests: a. removal of the applicant's general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 3 November 2011, from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) or transfer to the restricted folder of her AMHRR; and b. removal of all related documents to the GOMOR, dated 3 November 2011, from the restricted folder of the applicant's AMHRR. A memorandum from Headquarters and Headquarters Battalion, 8th U.S. Army, dated 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005321

    Original file (20150005321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 February 2013, both the applicant and SSG E____ K____ D____ were issued no-contact orders. On 26 May 2013, E____ K____ D____ filed a complaint with the State of North Carolina Cumberland County Magistrate against the applicant for threatening her children's life, her life, and putting his hands on her. d. She then asked the applicant a question about his wife and son and he grabbed her arms and slammed her against the wall and told her to never talk about his wife like that again and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002514

    Original file (20150002514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. Former PVT D____ R____ claimed she was sexually harassed by the applicant's licking and biting of his lips. The evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the finding of guilty of violating Army regulations by wrongfully touching and sexually harassing trainees. On 18 February 2014, the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Army, Criminal Law Division, Washington, DC, notified the applicant that: * his record of trial contained sufficient legal and competent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003602

    Original file (20110003602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change her name from "T____ M____ H____ IV" to "R____ I____ A____." This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence of record shows the applicant only used the name...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004596

    Original file (20150004596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A memorandum authored by COL C____ T___ to MG D____ B. A____, subject: Request for GOMOR, dated 11 July 2011, that shows he requested a GOMOR be issued to the applicant based on an incident on 26 June 2011, in which the applicant was involved in a verbal argument with his (the applicant's spouse) that turned physical when he grabbed her by the neck to prevent her from walking away from him. (1) It shows the rating chain as: * Rater: CW2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011529

    Original file (20110011529.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an expedited correction of his records as follows: a. to show he was promoted to colonel (COL) by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAGC) Promotion Selection Board (PSB) with an appropriate date of rank with entitlement to back pay and allowances; b. to remove the rater's narrative comments from his 2003 officer evaluation report (OER) and provide appropriate instructions to any PSB (including any appropriate special selection boards (SSBs); c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013054

    Original file (20090013054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    All documents and orders on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contain a name and/or gender, show the first name Edward and gender as male. However, while the applicant's desire to change the military record to show the name and gender she currently uses is understood, there is insufficient evidence to support granting the requested relief. The fact that subsequent to service the applicant changed her first name and gender does not provide a sufficiently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021645

    Original file (20140021645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and other identifying documents to show her: * name as K____a J___e O___n vice K_____h E____e O___n II * gender as male vice female 2. The evidence of record shows upon the applicant's enlistment and reenlistment in the RA, the applicant's name was listed as K_____h E____e O___n II and this is the name listed on the applicant's DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 26...