Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004495
Original file (20140004495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  3 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004495 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) Certificate, dated 17 May 2011, be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File).  

2.  He states his AMHRR contains an ARCOM Certificate and a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) Certificate and both are dated 17 May 2011.  He was presented the BSM in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and he has the certificate and DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) to prove that.  He requests that the ARCOM Certificate be deleted because he should not have two awards for the same action.  He does not want to be accused of dishonesty if he wears or claims both medals.  

3.  He states the award was originally submitted by Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) J______ A_____ and downgraded by the battalion commander, LTC M___ B______.  Upon discovering this, his senior rater, Colonel (COL) K______ R_____, resubmitted the award as the new recommender.  It was then approved as a BSM, which he was presented at the end of his deployment.  He believes that since there were two separate recommenders, both awards were viewed as being official and were uploaded into his AMHRR.  





4.  He provides:

* ARCOM Certificate
* BSM Certificate
* DA Form 638

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Following a period of enlisted service during which he completed the Officer Candidate Course, on 13 July 2006, the applicant took the oath of office as a Regular Army (RA) officer in the Infantry Branch.  He is currently serving in the RA as a captain.

2.  Orders in his record show he deployed to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) on or about 13 October 2010.

3.  His AMHRR contains an ARCOM Certificate and a BSM Certificate showing he received the awards for the period 17 October 2010 to 5 October 2011.  

	a.  The ARCOM Certificate shows Permanent Order (PO) Number 137-019, issued by Headquarters, Regional Command–South, announced award of the ARCOM to him for exceptionally meritorious service while serving as the CJ3 orders writer during OEF.  The certificate bears the signature of Major General (MG) J____ L. T____, Commanding General.

	b.  The BSM Certificate shows PO 257-016 announced award of the BSM to him for exceptionally meritorious service while assigned as the CJ3 orders writer during OEF.  The certificate bears the signature of MG J____ L. T____, Commanding General.

4.  He provides a DA Form 638 showing COL K______ R_____, Assistant Chief of Staff, CJ3, recommended him for award of the BSM for the period 17 October 2010 to 22 September 2011.  A company commander and a battalion commander (LTC M___ B______) recommended approval.  The award was approved by MG J____ L. T____ and announced in PO 257-016.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was erroneously awarded the ARCOM and BSM for meritorious service for the same period.  It would be appropriate to remove the ARCOM Certificate for the period 17 October 2010 to 5 October 2011 from his AMHRR.  

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from his AMHRR the ARCOM Certificate for the period 17 October 2010 to 5 October 2011.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004495



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004495



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004510

    Original file (20140004510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) Certificate, dated 20 July 2012, and Permanent Orders (PO) 277-10, dated 3 October 2012, be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). His AMHRR contains the contested ARCOM Certificate, which shows he received the award for the period 19 August 2009 through 27 July 2012 while he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000813

    Original file (20130000813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant argues: * BG T_____'s finding that he altered documents to make it appear he was on the convoy attacked on 8 January 2006 is untrue * BG T____ in his GOMOR endorsed the investigative finding that he (the applicant) falsified LTC R_____'s signature * BG T_____ issued him a GOMOR based on incomplete information * LTC R_____ indicated the CAB packet in question was one of several documents he signed prior to his departure * he does not believe that an administrative error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000062

    Original file (20110000062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No counseling statements to support the negative write up: (1) Senior leaders visited his operation in Iraq on several occasions; none expressed any concern with his performance; (2) He was relieved from his position as Deputy Program Director without any indication that his performance was not meeting the standards; (3) He was never told the reason why he was being relieved or given an opportunity to rebut; (4) If an investigation took place, he was not informed of it or shown any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005450

    Original file (20140005450.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    LTC S____ was new and did not yet know how the awards process in Afghanistan worked or the various commanders in Afghanistan who could approve award of a BSM when the time came to submit his award. m. The BSM is a combat award, the MSM is not. The applicant provides copies of the following: * Officer Record Brief * Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison Command, Orders XX-213-0001 * Combined Joint Task Force-1 (CJTF-1) and Regional Command-East Awards Staff Action Cover Sheet * three DA Forms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012690

    Original file (20130012690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) considered information that was erroneously placed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AHMRR) and has since been removed. He provided a memorandum from the Commanding General, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) and Fort Campbell, dated 27 February 2013, wherein MG J____ C. M____ stated he did not intend for the Army Regulation 15-6 investigation to be placed in the applicant's AMHRR as an allied document to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006786

    Original file (20140006786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states an AR 15-6 investigation was conducted about the command climate of the applicant's unit. Headquarters, 8th TSC, Fort Shafter, HI, memorandum, dated 27 April 2011, subject: AR 15-6 Investigation Appointment, shows COL B____ A____ was appointed as an IO by MG M____ J. T____, CG, 8th TSC, to conduct an informal AR 15-6 investigation into the command climate within the 45th SBDE command group, and an assessment of the relationship between the Brigade Commander, her brigade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014882

    Original file (20130014882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests: a. removal of the applicant's general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 3 November 2011, from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) or transfer to the restricted folder of her AMHRR; and b. removal of all related documents to the GOMOR, dated 3 November 2011, from the restricted folder of the applicant's AMHRR. A memorandum from Headquarters and Headquarters Battalion, 8th U.S. Army, dated 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002756

    Original file (20090002756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of the request for reconsideration, counsel provides copies of a Memorandum for Record (MFR) from the applicant's former battalion commander, the applicant's Non-Commissioned Officer Report for the period ending October 2004, a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), a Narrative Summary for award of the BSM to the applicant, an advisory opinion from the Military Award Branch to the Army Review Board Agency, electronic mail (email) correspondence from the applicant's former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000438

    Original file (20120000438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The corresponding citation states the ARCOM was issued by PO Number 265-004 on 24 September 2007 and reads: For exceptionally meritorious service while serving as an Anti-tank driver against enemy forces in the town of Kajaki Sofia, Afghanistan, during recovery operations of a downed aircraft, [applicant] displayed the ability to make sound and timely decisions in a high pressure situation. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) – as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005278

    Original file (20140005278 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence that he was awarded a fourth award of the ARCOM (i.e., ARCOM (3rd OLC)). (2) Recommendations for award of a decoration for meritorious service will not refer to acts of heroism or meritorious achievements which have been previously recognized by award of a decoration. The evidence of record shows that permanent orders awarded the applicant three awards of the ARCOM (i.e., ARCOM (2nd OLC)) and his DD Form 214...