Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004181
Original file (20140004181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004181 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show in:

* item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) – "HHC 1/327 101ST ABN DIV USARPAC"
* item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) – "94B2P"
* item 25 (Education and Training Completed) – "Parachute School USAIS 3 weeks"

2.  The applicant states he was assigned to the "1/327 not 1/321" which didn't exist.  He attended Parachute School at the 4th Student Battalion Training Support Brigade, Fort Benning, GA and as such his specialty code should read "94B2P."

3.  The applicant provides:

* Headquarters, The Student Brigade, U.S. Army Infantry School (USAIS), Special Orders Number 220
* DA Form 2658 (Health Record – Abstract of Service)
* Headquarters, 1st Brigade 101st Airborne Division, Letter Order Number 8-117
* DA Form 1049 (Personnel Action) 
* Request for Extension of Overseas Tour
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* DD Form 214
* DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge)
* U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center Letter Orders Number 01-1034018

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 11 February 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B (Cook).  The highest rank he held was specialist five/pay grade E-5.

3.  His DA Form 20 shows in:

* item 22 (MOSs) that his primary MOS was 94B2P
* item 28 (Specialized Training) that he completed 3 weeks of Basic Airborne training on 23 September 1966
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) that his last unit of assignment was Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry (Airborne)

4.  Headquarters, The Student Brigade, USAIS, Special Orders Number 220, dated 21 September 1966, show he was assigned to hazardous parachute duty effective 29 August 1966, that he was awarded the Parachutist Badge, and that he was awarded the airborne MOS special qualification identifier of "P."

5.  His record contains Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center Special Orders Number 352, dated 17 December 1968, showing he was being released from active duty on that date.  The standard name line shows his primary MOS as 94B2P.  Multiple other orders and documents in his record show his primary MOS as 94B2P.

6.  On 17 December 1968, he was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years, 10 months, and 7 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 12 – "HHC 1/321 101ST ABN DIV USARPAC"
* item 23a – "94B2O"
* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – Parachutist Badge 
* item 25 "FOOD SERVICE USATCA 8 WKS 66"

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It provided for entering service schools, including dates and major courses which were completed successfully during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His DA Form 20 shows he completed the Basic Airborne Course in September 1966.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this completed course.

2.  His DA Form 20 and multiple orders in his record show his primary MOS was 94B2P through the end of his military service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this specialty.

3.  His DA Form 20 shows his last unit of assignment was HHC, 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his last duty assignment and major command as "HHC 1/327 101ST ABN DIV USARPAC."

BOARD VOTE:
___ x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show in:

* item 12 – "HHC 1/327 101ST ABN DIV USARPAC"
* item 23a – "94B2P"
* item 25 – "Basic Airborne School, USAIS, 3 weeks, September 1966"



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004181



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004181



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007914

    Original file (20110007914.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows that at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 327th Infantry, it was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation during the period 29 July 1965 through 1 October 1966 based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 17, dated 1968. Evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to HHC, 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 327th Infantry, 101st Airborne Division, APO 96347 USARV. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010946

    Original file (20140010946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his DD Form 214 does not show award of the Parachutist Badge * his last duty assignment was Company D, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, USARPAC * his MOS was 11B1P, not 54A1O (chemical operations apprentice) * he served in Vietnam from 23 August 1967 to 8 December 1968 * his DD Form 214 does not reflect his proper military service at discharge 3. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007587C070205

    Original file (20060007587C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 15 February 1968, to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 13A1O and that he served in Vietnam. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968, should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003417

    Original file (20130003417.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 June 1967 through 25 January 1969; b. deleting from his DD Form 214 in: * item 23a the entry "052P Radio Operator" * item 25 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088738C070403

    Original file (2003088738C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), one is dated 19 March 2003, and the other is dated 17 April 2003. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any entry in item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003708

    Original file (20120003708.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He adds his records are incorrect because: * his RVN service is not properly recognized * he was assigned to an airborne unit and awarded the Parachutist Badge, but he was not airborne 3. The evidence shows the applicant, while assigned to the 763rd Ordnance Detachment, 82nd Airborne Division, was part of a team sent to the RVN to deploy the ground-launched TOW missile. Based on the above evidence, the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 May 1973 should be corrected to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026599

    Original file (20100026599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's request for award of the CIB, correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award, and correction of his DD Form 214 to show he held MOS 11B was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support this request. Absent this evidence, there is insufficient evidence upon which to award the CIB in this case, or to correct his DD Form 214 to show it.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010095

    Original file (20100010095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was a paratrooper with the 1st Battalion, 325th Infantry, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC; that he volunteered for service in Vietnam; and all of his authorized awards and decorations. (1) Special orders awarded the applicant MOS 36K2P and it is recorded in item 23a of his DD Form 214. (2) However, item 25 of his DD Form 214 does not show the training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073851C070403

    Original file (2002073851C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thomas B___ states that he and the applicant were both members of the Reconnaissance Platoon of the 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry (Airborne), 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam. Absent his service medical records, there is insufficient evidence to show the fragmentation wounds that occurred in 1966 were the result of hostile action. NOTE : The Board requests the Army Review Board Agency's Support Division amend the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059318C070421

    Original file (2001059318C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he earned the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. Although there is no evidence to show that the applicant served as a combat medical aidman with this unit and was personally present when the unit was under hostile fire and actively engaged in ground combat, the Board does find sufficient supporting evidence to show his last duty assignment was HHC, 2 nd...