Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003711
Original file (20140003711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003711 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be paid for 20 days pay and allowances.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he lost 20 days of leave when he retired on 31 January 2014 because finance personnel gave his unit the wrong information in regard to how his leave form was to be filled out in determining when his transition leave would begin.  He goes on to state that errors were made by several agencies and himself in determining when he would begin transition leave so that he would not lose any leave.  However, when it was all said and done he had lost approximately $5,000 in pay and allowances.  Additionally, he contacted finance officials at Fort Benning, Georgia and was told that nothing could be done in his case. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his leave form (DA Form 31), Leave and Earnings Statement, and separation orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 July 1987.  He completed his training as an infantryman and remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the rank of command sergeant major (CSM) on 1 September 2006.

2.  On 24 September 2013, the applicant departed on 110 days of permissive temporary duty (TDY).  His Leave and Earnings Statement ending in September 2013 shows a leave credit balance of 97.5 days and 25 days of use or lose leave.

3.  On 31 January 2014, the applicant was retired due to sufficient service for retirement.  He had served 26 years, 6 months, and 3 days of creditable active service.  He was placed on the Retired List effective 1 February 2014.

4.  The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement ending January 2014 shows the applicant lost 20 days of leave.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-10 serves as the authority for leaves and passes.  It states, in pertinent part, that Congress has provided compensation (no more than 60 days in a military career) for Soldiers who were not able to use their leave because military requirements prevented it.  Soldiers will not be required to use leave immediately prior to separation simply for the purpose of reducing leave balances.  On the other hand, use of leave as an extra money program defeats the intent of Congress to provide for the health and welfare of Soldiers.  It should not be used either as a method of compensation or as a career continuation incentive.  It is specifically intended that large leave balances will not be accrued expressly for settlement upon release from active duty.  Additionally, leave will not be granted that will interfere with timely processing or transition.

6.  Department of Defense (DOD) Financial Management Regulation (also known as the DOD Pay Manual) provides, in pertinent part, that beginning on 10 February 1976, a military member may not be paid for more than 60 days of accrued leave during a career.  An exception to that provision was approved effective 2 August 1990, which allowed Reserve and Retired Component members who were called to active duty during the Persian Gulf Conflict to be paid for accrued leave over the 60-day limit. 
 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be paid for his lost leave because he was improperly advised by finance personnel has been noted and while the sincerity of his claim is not in doubt, management of a Soldier’s leave account is the responsibility of the individual Soldier.

2.  While it is unfortunate that the applicant may have lost some of his accrued leave at the time of his separation, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was unjustly denied the opportunity to take ordinary or transitional leave at some time prior to his scheduled separation date.
3.  Although it is not the intent of the Government that Soldiers lose their accrued leave, Soldiers are routinely denied transition leave due to mission essential needs.  There are no guarantees that transition leave will always be approved or that circumstances will change that prevent one from taking transition leave, which is an inherent risk in accumulating large sums of leave for such purposes.

4.  Notwithstanding the foregoing conclusions, there are no provisions in the applicable law that allows for payment to the applicant for leave lost.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003711





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003711



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070675C070402

    Original file (2002070675C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that Congress has provided compensation (no more than 60 days in a military career) for soldiers who were not able to use their leave because military requirements prevented it. While it is unfortunate that the applicant may have lost some of his accrued leave at the time of his separation, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was unjustly denied the opportunity to take ordinary or terminal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021275

    Original file (20110021275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be paid for 114.5 days of accrued leave he lost at the time of retirement. The applicant was not authorized to be paid for his accrued leave at the time of his separation because he was not authorized to be paid for more than 60 days of leave in a career and he had already cashed in 60 days of leave during prior separations (although it appears he may have had additional special leave paid for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005658

    Original file (20070005658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's October 2006 LES shows that he had a balance of 49.5 days of accrued leave, lost 19 days, and 17 use/lose leave. On 5 February 2007, the G1 replied to the applicant's question, "Can a Soldier without any SLA and with a leave balance of 87 days retire on 30 September and cash in 31 days of leave on 30 September and go into transition leave for the remainder of October and November"? The applicant reported for his final outprocessing on 29 September 2006, one day prior to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017593

    Original file (20080017593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Congress has provided compensation (no more than 60 days in a military career) for Soldiers who were not able to use their leave because military requirements prevented it. While it is not readily apparent, based on the available evidence, where the applicant lost the 11.5 days of leave she claims, the information obtained from DFAS indicates that she was paid for 15.5 days of leave that she was not authorized to be paid. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to dispute the information...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081435C070215

    Original file (2002081435C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Congress has provided compensation (no more than 60 days in a military career) for soldiers who were not able to use their leave because military requirements prevented it. While it is unfortunate that the applicant lost some of his accrued leave, as do many soldiers every year, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070671C070402

    Original file (2002070671C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be paid for the 70 days of leave he lost at the time of retirement. His orders also authorized 60 days of transition leave. While it is unfortunate that the applicant may have lost some of his accrued leave at the time of his separation, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was unjustly denied the opportunity to take ordinary or terminal leave at some time prior to his scheduled...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015482

    Original file (20130015482.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was charged regular leave while on convalescent leave in addition to being billed for treatment for an infection that occurred while on active duty. The applicant provides: a. Evidence that shows an orthopedic surgeon at MacDill Air Force Base, FL, recommended convalescent leave from 16 February to 11 March and 11 March to 11 April 2012. c. A Leave and Earnings Statement for 25 April 2012 that shows he began the period with a leave balance of 84 days, he was charged 84 days leave, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003414

    Original file (20150003414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003414 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, when he left the Army he had accrued a total of 76 days of leave. His LES for the period 1-31 July 2014, which shows he had a leave balance of 76 days and had been previously paid for 60 days of accrued leave.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078726C070215

    Original file (2002078726C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. It states, in pertinent part, that Congress has provided compensation (no more than 60 days in a military career) for soldiers who were not able to use their leave because military requirements prevented it. While it is unfortunate that the applicant may have lost some of his accrued leave at the time of his separation, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075556C070403

    Original file (2002075556C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: While it is unfortunate that the applicant may have lost some of his accrued leave at the time of his separation, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was unjustly denied the opportunity to take ordinary or terminal leave at some time prior to his separation date. The Board is not an investigative agency and while it reviews many cases in which soldiers make...