Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003061
Original file (20140003061 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    9 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003061 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by deleting the awards that he is not entitled to.

2.  The applicant states the National Defense Service Medal and Army Lapel Button are recorded in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  However, the two award entries are incorrect and could lead to the U.S. Government concluding that he is dishonest and result in a conspiracy (plot) against him.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 17 November 1988 for a period of 8 years.  He then enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 January 1989 for a period of 4 years.  His military service records also show that he was –

* awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewmember)
* promoted to specialist four/pay grade E-4 on 1 January 1991
* in Korea from 1 May 1990 through 24 July 1991

3.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns), in pertinent part, that he was authorized the –

* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Lapel Button

4.  On 4 November 1991, the applicant requested early separation under the provisions of the Enlisted Voluntary Early Separation program.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 30 January 1992 and transferred to the Louisiana Army National Guard to complete his military service obligation.  He had completed 3 years and 6 days of net active service this period.  Item 13 shows he was authorized or awarded the –

* Army Achievement Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-16) Rifle Bar
* Army Lapel Button

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.

	a.  The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995 (emphasis added), and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

	b.  The Army Lapel Button is a gratuitous issue item and the eligibility requirements include, in pertinent part, those Soldiers transitioning with an honorable characterization of service (e.g., Soldiers being transferred to another component for completion of a military service obligation and those receiving an Honorable Discharge Certificate).

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation from active duty, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The instructions for item 13 state that entries will be for all periods of service.  Check the Soldier's military service records for the validity of awards.  Do not abbreviate when listing the entries.  List the entries in order of precedent.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served honorably on active duty from 25 January 1989 through 30 January 1992.  The National Defense Service Medal was authorized during the period 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995. Thus, the applicant met the qualifying criteria for authorization and award of the National Defense Service Medal.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Louisiana Army National Guard to complete his military service obligation.  The Army Lapel Button is authorized for Soldiers transitioning from the Regular Army to another Army component (e.g., the Army National Guard).  Thus, he met the qualifying criteria for the Army Lapel Button.

3.  Based on the foregoing, the evidence of record confirms the applicant's entitlement to the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Lapel Button.

4.  Therefore, the evidence of record does not support granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003061



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003061



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003061

    Original file (20140003061.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the National Defense Service Medal and Army Lapel Button are recorded in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The instructions for item 13 state that entries will be for all periods of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Louisiana Army National Guard to complete...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003691C070206

    Original file (20050003691C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain a copy of DD Form 214, with an effective date of 3 May 1991, which shows in Item 13 that he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, Army Lapel Button, and National Defense Service Medal. The applicant's records contain a copy of NGB Form 22 (Department of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau, Report of Separation and Record of Service), with an effective date of 10 March 1992, which shows in Item 15 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019084

    Original file (20120019084.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant was ever awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal while he was in the Army. The evidence of record clearly shows that he served a qualifying period of service for award of the KDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for exceptional conduct and efficiency during the period 13 March 1990 through 22 March 1991; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014510

    Original file (20080014510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant completed a qualifying period of active Federal service for issuance of the Army Lapel Button. In any event, while letters of appreciation and/or commendation may be filed in military service records, they are not recorded on the DD Form 214. As a matter of information, awards and service medals are not issued by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008482

    Original file (20130008482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show all awards and service medals that were omitted from his official military personnel file. The applicant contends that his military service records should be corrected to show all of his awards and service medals. Thus, the evidence of record shows that all of his authorized awards and decorations are recorded on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002153C070205

    Original file (20060002153C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060002153 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the Army Honorable Service Lapel Button and the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 27 February 1989 to 26 February 1992. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006290

    Original file (20110006290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. Therefore, this military document alone is insufficient evidence as a basis to correct her DD Form 214 to show these awards. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012729

    Original file (20100012729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. There is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence, to show that he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal Therefore, this award should not be included on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018818

    Original file (20140018818 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), an incomplete DD Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), and a U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Awards and Decorations Branch letter. A DD Form 214 records a Soldier's active duty service and an NGB Form 22 records a Soldier's ARNG service. The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that his periods of service are improperly recorded on any of the appropriate forms or that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018065

    Original file (20090018065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states his unit did not record the awards on his DD Form 214. Although he received IDP/HFP from 27 September 1990 to 21 June 1991, his TCS/TDY orders that show his service from on or about 25 September 1990 to 17 April 1991 are consistent with the dates shown on the Gulf War roster which shows his service as 1 October 1990 to 15 April 1991.