Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002965
Original file (20140002965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  21 October 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140002965 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an exception to policy to allow him to transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that while he was deployed between 2010 and 2011 he transferred his education benefits to his family members.  However, due to a system error his election was not recorded and he is now being informed that he will incur an additional four-year service obligation upon the transfer of his benefits.

3.  The applicant provides:

* 3 character references
* Memorandum, Subject:  Information on School Benefits Claim, dated 
4 February 2014
* email correspondence between the applicant and officials from the Army Continuing Education Division

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) as a sergeant first class (SFC/E-7).

2.  His record contains a memorandum, dated 7 March 2013, SUBJECT:  Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter) which informed him that he had completed the required years of qualifying Reserve service and was eligible for retired pay at age 60.

3.  He provided:

	a.  An email, dated 23 December 2013, from the Finance and Incentive Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC ) notifying him that his TEB request was approved and as such his additional service obligation was established as 19 December 2017.

	b.  Three character references in which the authors attest to the applicant's integrity and trustworthiness.  They all believe that he did in fact submit his TEB request while deployed to Afghanistan in 2011 and he should not be penalized for a system error.

	c.  A memorandum authored by the applicant wherein he contends that he initiated the transfer of his education benefits while deployed to Afghanistan in 2011 and the fact that there is no record of the transaction is due to no fault of his own.  He planned to retire upon the completion of 20 years of service but having this additional service obligation has demoralized him in such a way that he cannot describe it.

4.  The TEB website shows the date of his request as 20 December 2013.  There is no record showing that the applicant requested TEB between 2010 and 2011.

5.  Public Law 110-252 limits the eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve.  A Soldier must also agree to serve the prescribed additional service obligation.

6.  Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 13-102 (Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Four-Year Service Obligation for Approved TEB Requests Submitted on/after 1 August 2013), issued 15 April 2013, states that all Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB requests submitted and approved on or after 1 August 2013 will incur a four-year service obligation from the TEB request date, regardless of years in service (except when precluded by either policy or statute from committing an additional four years, e.g., Temporary Early Retirement Authority).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request to correct his record to show he was eligible to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits has been carefully considered.  However, the governing law is very specific regarding the transfer of benefits.
2.  It appears that he was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits to his family members under the TEB at the time the program was implemented in July 2009.  He contends that he completed his TEB request in 2011 while deployed to Afghanistan; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his contention.  

3.  His sincerity is not in question.  However, DOD policy requires that individuals incur a four-year additional service obligation at the time they elect to transfer their education benefits, and as such the applicant would incur this additional service obligation.

4.  In view of the above, and lacking evidence to the contrary, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON


I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002965





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002965



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019682

    Original file (20130019682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in part, that active duty Soldiers are entitled to Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. In view of the available evidence it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he submitted a timely request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his daughter prior to 1 August 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009459

    Original file (20120009459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states he was briefed on the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB, but he was not informed that he had to be on active duty to transfer the benefits. The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement; therefore, he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or his children (if he completed the request before leaving military service). The evidence of record shows the applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his family members under the TEB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019514

    Original file (20130019514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his sons under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The Army did not have a record of his GI Bill. Records show the applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no convincing evidence showing he did so.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00081

    Original file (BC-2011-00081.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00081 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) that was incurred as a result of the Post 9/11 GI Bill transfer of education benefits (TEB) to his dependent children be changed from 8 April 2014 to 19 August 2013. The complete AF/A1PA evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00447

    Original file (BC 2014 00447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00447 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents without incurring an additional Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC). Per AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program, A9.18.1.4.2, dated 13 August 2010, for those members eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009, no additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001932

    Original file (20140001932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his spouse under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The record shows that upon transferring his education benefits to his dependents his TEB Obligation End Date was determined to be 4 December 2015. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for QMP and retired on 30 November 2013.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017115

    Original file (20130017115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. While deployed to Afghanistan, and after the 31 January 2013 deadline, he transferred his Post 9/11 education benefits to his daughter on 6 February 2013. f. An ETP to All Army Activities (ALARACT) Message 003/2013 (Transferability of Education Benefits/Qualitative Service Program (QSP)) should be established for Soldiers deployed to a combat zone during the benefit transfer deadline. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018850

    Original file (20110018850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, transfer of his educational benefits to his daughter under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. The applicant states: a. he was not adequately informed of regulations requiring an additional 2-year active duty service commitment in order to transfer his 9/11 Montgomery GI Bill benefits to his daughter. He was retirement eligible in November 2010, and he has an approved retirement date of 29 February 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007393

    Original file (20140007393 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show his request to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. It stated: * officers who elected the TEB prior to SERB selection would retain their transfer and not face recoupment if they agreed to serve until the mandatory separation date established by the SERB * officers electing voluntary retirement in lieu of the SERB consideration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007393

    Original file (20140007393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show his request to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. It stated: * officers who elected the TEB prior to SERB selection would retain their transfer and not face recoupment if they agreed to serve until the mandatory separation date established by the SERB * officers electing voluntary retirement in lieu of the SERB consideration...