Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019682
Original file (20130019682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		BOARD DATE:	  6 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019682 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) to transfer his education benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post 9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was deployed to Afghanistan from May 2012 to May 2013.  He took leave and returned to duty on 16 July 2013.  He was unaware that he would incur an additional service obligation if his benefits were not transferred by 1 August 2013, which was the cut-off date; therefore, when he attempted to transfer his benefits he encountered difficulty.  He continues by stating that he has 29 years of service and desires to retire when he reaches 
30 years of service.  He has now been informed that he has incurred a 4-year additional service obligation because his transfer was completed after 1 August 2013.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his deployment orders, DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), letters from the Department of Veterans Affairs, and an internet printout regarding TEB.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 November 1984 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and has remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted sergeant major on 
1 November 2005. 

2.  He deployed to Afghanistan during the period May 2012 to May 2013 and returned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky where he departed on leave until 15 July 2013.

3.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command which opines that there is sufficient evidence to show that given his deployment he may have been unaware of the requirement to transfer his benefits prior to 1 August 2013 in order to avoid an additional service obligation.  The opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he essentially concurred.

4.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.

5.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy that identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.

6.  On 7 January 2013, All Army Activities (ALARACT) Message 003/2013 was disseminated to the force.  It states, in part, that active duty Soldiers are entitled to Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits.  TEB to dependents is not an entitlement.  By law, the purpose of the TEB is to enhance both recruiting and retention in the service.  Soldiers must agree to an associated additional service obligation in order to transfer their education benefits to their dependents after 1 August 2013.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to transfer his education benefits to his daughter under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill has been carefully examined.

2.  The applicant's contention that his deployment to a combat mission in Afghanistan hindered his ability to transfer his benefits in a timely manner because he was unaware of the change in the eligibility criteria appears to have merit.

3.  It is reasonable to presume the applicant was not immediately aware or informed of the changes to the TEB because he was deployed to a combat area at the time of its release and was unaware that he had to accomplish the TEB by 1 August 2013 in order to avoid incurring an additional service obligation. 

4.  In view of the available evidence it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he submitted a timely request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his daughter prior to 1 August 2013.
BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  _X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his daughter prior to 1 August 2013 provided all of the eligibility criteria was met.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019682



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019682



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017115

    Original file (20130017115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. While deployed to Afghanistan, and after the 31 January 2013 deadline, he transferred his Post 9/11 education benefits to his daughter on 6 February 2013. f. An ETP to All Army Activities (ALARACT) Message 003/2013 (Transferability of Education Benefits/Qualitative Service Program (QSP)) should be established for Soldiers deployed to a combat zone during the benefit transfer deadline. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005622

    Original file (20120005622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A VA Certificate of Eligibility, dated 23 February 2012, shows the applicant was approved to transfer 36 months of education benefits to her daughter under the Post 9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had nearly 12 years of service as of the program’s implementation date of 1 August 2009; therefore, she was eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children. She transferred benefits to her dependent on 19 January 2012. d. A Soldier must also agree to serve the prescribed additional service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014880

    Original file (20140014880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of educational benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018850

    Original file (20110018850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, transfer of his educational benefits to his daughter under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. The applicant states: a. he was not adequately informed of regulations requiring an additional 2-year active duty service commitment in order to transfer his 9/11 Montgomery GI Bill benefits to his daughter. He was retirement eligible in November 2010, and he has an approved retirement date of 29 February 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002965

    Original file (20140002965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 13-102 (Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Four-Year Service Obligation for Approved TEB Requests Submitted on/after 1 August 2013), issued 15 April 2013, states that all Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB requests submitted and approved on or after 1 August 2013 will incur a four-year service obligation from the TEB request date, regardless of years in service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703

    Original file (BC 2013 01703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009459

    Original file (20120009459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states he was briefed on the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB, but he was not informed that he had to be on active duty to transfer the benefits. The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement; therefore, he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or his children (if he completed the request before leaving military service). The evidence of record shows the applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his family members under the TEB...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00447

    Original file (BC 2014 00447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00447 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents without incurring an additional Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC). Per AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program, A9.18.1.4.2, dated 13 August 2010, for those members eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009, no additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020845

    Original file (20120020845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his education benefits were transferred to his eligible dependent in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant states that due to his being deployed as a Department of Defense (DoD) civilian he was unaware of his eligibility to transfer his benefits. On 22 June 2009, the DoD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007288

    Original file (20140007288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, to adjust the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) Obligation End Date (OED) and the Department of the Army TEB Service Obligation to 31 October 2011, his last day on active duty. The applicant was on active duty when he requested TEB. With regard to his daughter's approximately $33,000.00 debt which the VA initiated due to the applicant not fulfilling the TEB OED, the VA permits the veteran to submit a request for relief through the VA...