Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002688
Original file (20140002688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  16 September 2014  	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140002688 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by annotating the entry “Interim Training Discharge” in item 27 (Remarks) and voiding his service and discharge from the National Guard. 

2.  The applicant states that he did not complete his 5 weeks of basic training so he was not officially a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG); he withdrew his application for enlistment because he broke his arm and did not attend training.  He also states that he was denied employment because of failure to truthfully and accurately provide information related to his military service.  However, the records are inaccurate and should be corrected and his ARNG service should be removed from his records.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), and the withdrawal of job offer. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 27 June 1978 and was transferred to Fort Jackson, South Carolina to undergo his basic training.  However, the applicant was unable to understand and/or communicate in English and was honorably discharged on 7 August 1978 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-33 and the Trainee Discharge Program (TDP).  He was issued a separation program designator (SPD) of “JEM” indicating separation under the TDP.  He had served 1 month and 11 days of active service.

3.  On 3 April 1986, he enlisted in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) for a period of 8 years, training as a pioneer, and for a cash enlistment bonus.  He was ordered to initial active duty for training with a report date to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri of 12 May 1987 for his one-station unit training.  He failed to report as ordered and was reported as being absent without leave (AWOL).

4.  On 11 June 1987, he was discharged from the CAARNG under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph 8-27u, due to being absent without authority.  His service was uncharacterized.  

5.  DA Message DTG 011510Z August 1973, subject: Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees before 180 Active Duty days established the TDP.  It provided the criteria for the separation of personnel under the TDP who lacked the necessary motivation, discipline, ability, or aptitude to become a productive Soldier.  It states, in pertinent part, that commanders may expeditiously discharge members of the RA, ARNG, or U.S. Army Reserve who have completed 179 days or less of active duty and have demonstrated that they cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life.  Commanders were authorized to issue either an Honorable or General Discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted and appear to lack merit.  His DD Form 214 correctly reflects in block 9c the authority for his discharge and an SPD Code of “JEM” which indicates that he was discharged under the TDP.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to add an unauthorized entry of “Interim Training Discharge” to his DD Form 214.  

2.  The applicant enlisted in the CAARNG on 3 April 1986 and was a member of the CAARNG until he was discharged on 11 June 1987 due to being AWOL.  He signed a valid enlistment contract and has provided no evidence to show that his contract was ever voided.

3.  The available evidence shows he was properly discharged from the CAARNG and it is properly recorded in his official records.  He has not provided any evidence to show that an error or injustice exists in his case.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002688



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140002688



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008745C070208

    Original file (20040008745C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. AR 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028065

    Original file (20100028065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was honorably separated from the ARNGUS and CAARNG on 29 January 1982 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation. On 7 May 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, with issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table also shows RE code 4 as an appropriate RE code to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020417

    Original file (20110020417.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to correct his record to show his retirement grade as captain (CPT)/O3-E (prior enlisted service). The evidence of record shows the applicant was credited with 4 years of active enlisted service while serving in the U.S. Navy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army, Army National Guard, and State records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending the entry in Orders D306-18, dated 2 November 2009...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071131C070402

    Original file (2002071131C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active Duty) corrected to show that he had 2 months of foreign service, prior service from 21 August 1985 to 10 November 1987 and, in effect, that he had been authorized or awarded the Reserve Components Overseas Service Ribbon, the Army Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064076C070421

    Original file (2001064076C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. He was released from active duty and discharged as a Reserve of the Army and returned to the ARNG on 18 November 1976. The applicant has not presented and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003276

    Original file (20130003276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged for medical reasons and correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 May 1977 to show his separation program designator (SPD) code as "SFJ" instead of "JEM." Army Regulation 635-5-1 provides that SPD code "SFJ" pertains to enlisted Soldiers discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Personnel Separations-Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023737

    Original file (20110023737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show the following awards: * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM) * Soldier's Medal 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016144

    Original file (20080016144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a non-Regular retirement and that she be entitled to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. Instead of recommending that the 5 excess retirement points be redistributed to membership points in the retirement year beginning 6 November 2007 and ending 11 July 2008, the Chief, Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009142

    Original file (20120009142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 June 1999 to add the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (5th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (5th Award) * Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (2nd Award) * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061864C070421

    Original file (2001061864C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that while serving in the AGR Program for the California Army National Guard (CAARNG), he was unjustly discharged from active duty prior to his expiration of term of service (ETS). Likewise, the Interstate Transfer Request (NGB Form 22-4-R) submitted by the applicant simply indicates transfer to the ARARNG. Furthermore, the Board finds that in the absence of evidence to show that he was being transferred from one AGR position to another AGR position, he was...