IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 September 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002128
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states that at the time of his discharge, the authorities claimed he was absent without leave (AWOL) from his duty station. However, he was on leave in Sallisaw, OK when an ice storm hit the area and he was not able to make it back on time.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 September 2007. He completed initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 12N (Horizontal Construction Engineer). The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist (SPC)/E-4. However, at the time of his discharge he held the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1.
2. The applicant's record contains a DD Form 553 (Deserter/Absentee Wanted by the Armed Forces), dated 20 January 2010, which shows he departed his unit in an AWOL status on 18 December 2010. On 20 January 2011, his unit dropped him from the rolls.
3. On 7 February 2011, the applicant's company commander rendered a memorandum initiating action to disqualify the applicant for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (in his absence) due to being flagged at the time for being on the overweight program.
4. The applicant's record contains a DD Form 553, dated 1 March 2011, which shows he was apprehended by civilian authorities in Sallisaw, OK on 1 March 2011 and returned to military control.
5. The complete facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge are not available for review with this case. However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), in lieu of trial by court-martial on 31 May 2011. He completed 3 years, 5 months, and 23 days of total active service with 2 months and 14 days of time lost.
6. On 15 February 2013, the President of the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) notified the applicant that after careful review of his application, military records and all other available evidence, the ADRB determined that he was properly and equitably discharged. Accordingly, his request for a change in the character and/or reason of his discharge was denied.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. Commanders would ensure that an individual was not coerced into submitting a request for discharge for the good of the service. Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, the type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally given to an individual who was discharged for the good of the service.
a. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected to show he received an honorable discharge was carefully considered.
2. Although the applicant contends that he was unable to return to his duty station due to an ice storm, there is no evidence in his record and he has not provided sufficient evidence to support this contention or that he contacted his unit to inform them that his return would be delayed. Additionally, the occurrence of an ice storm would not fully explain why he was AWOL for a period of 2 months and 14 days.
3. The evidence of record indicates he was charged with the commission of offense(s) punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice with a punitive discharge. Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant is presumed to have voluntarily, willingly, and in writing, requested discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he would have admitted guilt and waived his opportunity to appear before a court-martial. It is also presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Further, the applicants discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant an honorable or a general discharge-.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X____ ___X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002128
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002128
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009895
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation states that the DD Forms 553 and 616 are filed on the performance section of the OMPF and that the DA Form 4187 that shows time lost to be made good to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022781
His OMPF does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that shows he was discharged on 6 October 2005 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. His DD Form 214 also shows he was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of "KFS" (voluntary discharge - in lieu of trial by court-martial) and a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010886
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically discharged instead of being discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued at the time of his discharge shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. Once a determination of physical unfitness is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001169
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of the Record of Proceedings under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) from his military records. On 4 December 2014 after carefully considering the evidence of record and the evidence presented by the applicant, the ABCMR denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005573
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge. He was told he would be issued an undesirable discharge, but it would be automatically upgraded to a general after 6 months. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020026
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012646
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008179
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, the record does include a DD Form 214 that confirms she was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), in lieu of trial by court-martial, and she received a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) on 12 September 2008. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003890
The applicant requests a medical discharge. As a result his company commander initiated action to discharge him, the separation authority approved his discharge, and he was discharged accordingly on 4 May 2012. There is no evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence to show his PTSD or any other medical condition was medically unfitting (in accordance with the standards of Army Regulation 40-501).
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015516
On 19 February 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...