Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022781
Original file (20100022781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  13 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022781 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he lost his group before basic training so he took a bus back to the recruiting office.  The recruiters told him to go back to Fort Sill, OK.  He went back to Fort Sill and he was tried by a court-martial which he did not attend.  He was told he had to serve 60 days in jail or he would be court-martialed.  His mother hired a lawyer; however, he was discharged with an 
RE code of 4.  He also states he does not understand what he did wrong since he did not even get to basic training.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in U.S. Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program on 
19 May 2005 and in the Regular Army on 2 June 2005.

2.  A DD Form 553 (Deserter/Absentee Wanted by the Armed Forces) shows that he departed absent without leave (AWOL) on 3 June 2005.  

3.  On 21 June 2005, court-martial charges were preferred against him for being AWOL.

4.  A DD Form 616 (Report of Return of Absentee) shows he returned to military control on 19 August 2005.
5.  His separation proceedings were not found in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  His OMPF does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that shows he was discharged on 6 October 2005 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

6.  His DD Form 214 also shows he was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of "KFS" (voluntary discharge - in lieu of trial by court-martial) and a corresponding RE code of "4."

7.  The Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for a change in his RE code on 17 September 2008.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states that the SPD code "KFS" is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, by reason of voluntary discharge - in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, in effect at the time, provided that an RE code of 4 would be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of "KFS."

10.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the Reserve.  The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  This chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  RE–4 applies to persons not qualified for continued service because they were separated from the service with a non-waivable disqualification

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his RE code be changed.

2.  Although his separation proceedings are not available for review with this case, it is presumed he voluntarily requested discharge from the Army to avoid a trial by court-martial, under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 
635-200.  Based on the applicant's authority and reason for separation, he was properly assigned an SPD code of "KFS" and an RE code of "4" in accordance with the applicable regulations.  He has failed to provide evidence showing that an error exists on his DD Form 214.

3.  In view of the above, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  _x_______  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022781



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022781



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013944C071029

    Original file (20060013944C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dale E. DeBruler | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's record contains a Deserter/Absentee Wanted by the Armed Forces (DD Form 553), which shows the applicant went absent without leave (AWOL) on 26 January 2004. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015684

    Original file (20080015684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged with a separation code of "KFS" (For the Good of the Service - In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial) and issued an RE code of 4. Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect, at the time, established RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service. In the absence of the applicant's chapter 10 discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014072

    Original file (20070014072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his records do contain sufficient evidence to show that he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of chapter 10 (Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Separations). Item 25 (Separation Authority) indicates he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003252

    Original file (20090003252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that, at age 17, on 22 March 2000, he was separated with a UOTHC discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. By regulation, the SPD code of KFS and an RE code of “4” will be assigned to members who are discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008179

    Original file (20090008179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, the record does include a DD Form 214 that confirms she was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), in lieu of trial by court-martial, and she received a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) on 12 September 2008. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011935

    Original file (20100011935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of a trial by court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD code KFS is the correct code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014222

    Original file (20110014222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry (RE) code as 1 vice 4 so he can enlist in any branch of the service without a waiver. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request was approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016390

    Original file (20070016390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 August 2006, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 25 August 2006 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013104

    Original file (20090013104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 May 2003, the applicant was accordingly discharged. The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200. The evidence of record further confirms that the applicant's RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 in lieu of a trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009955

    Original file (AR20070009955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., in lieu of trial by court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."