Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003710
Original file (20120003710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 11 September 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003710 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show, at a minimum, that his service was under honorable conditions.

2.  The applicant states he completed active duty for training (ADT) without incident; however, item 24 (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 was recorded as "uncharacterized."

	a.  He states he completed the required training, his training evaluations do not show any adverse information, and his duty performance was satisfactory.

	b.  He adds he continued to serve honorably for 10 years in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

3.  The applicant provides:

* A DA Form 87 (Certificate of Training), dated 10 November 1988
* A Fort Leonard Wood (FLW) Form 64 (Counseling Record for Initial Entry Training (IET) Soldiers), dated 12 November 1988
* His DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 February 1989
* A DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 20 August 1996


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 9 August 1988 for a period of 8 years.

3.  Orders 159-26, issued by the Chicago Military Entrance Processing Station, Des Plaines, IL, dated 9 August 1988, ordered the applicant to Initial ADT (IADT) on 8 September 1988 for a period of 17 weeks or completion of basic and military occupational specialty (MOS) training.

4.  Orders 12-193, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Engineer Center, FLW, MO, dated 12 January 1989, awarded the applicant MOS 62B (Construction Equipment Repairer) effective 10 February 1989.

5.  A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered IADT on 8 September 1988 and he was released from ADT on 10 February 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of completion of ADT.  The character of service shown on this DD Form 214 shows the entry "uncharacterized."  It further shows he:

	a.  completed 5 months and 3 days of net active service this period, and

	b.  was transferred back to his USAR assigned unit in Harvey, IL to complete his Reserve obligation.

6.  In support of his request, the applicant provides:

	a.  A DA Form 87, dated 10 November 1988, that shows he successfully completed Basic Training.


	b.  an FLW Form 64, dated 12 November 1988, that shows during Phase 4 of his training he was rated "2" (Meets Standards) in all evaluated areas.

	c.  a DD Form 256A, dated 20 August 1996, that shows he was honorably discharge from the USAR on that date.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

   a.  Chapter 3 (Character of Service/Description of Service):

   	(1)  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Only the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted (emphasis added): and

   	(2)  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory, but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

	b.  Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Agreement) provides that a Soldier will be separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation.

	c.  Section II (Terms) of the glossary states that for Reserve Soldiers, entry-level status begins upon enlistment in the USAR.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was released from ADT either honorably or under honorable conditions because his duty performance was satisfactory.

2.  Records show the applicant was ordered to IADT on 8 September 1988 and he was released from ADT on 10 February 1989.  He completed 5 months and
3 days (or 153 days) of training.  Therefore, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was in an entry-level status when he was released from ADT.

3.  The evidence of record shows that an entry-level status Soldier's separation with be "uncharacterized."

4.  Records show the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, based on completion of ADT was administratively correct and in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time.  In addition, the character of service entered in item 24 of his DD Form 214 was proper and correct.

5.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

6.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  _____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003710



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003710



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008030

    Original file (20090008030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); Headquarters, 2nd Troop, 104th Aviation Battalion, Annville, PA, memorandum, dated 9 December 1995; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military Affairs, The Adjutant General, Annville, PA, Orders 025-012, dated 6 February 1996; NGB Form 22 (Report of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014405

    Original file (20100014405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "uncharacterized" to "honorable." The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from IADT under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of expiration of term of service with an uncharacterized character of service. A Soldier being separated upon expiration of enlistment or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016736

    Original file (20120016736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 1989 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an honorable characterization of service and a reenlist eligibility (RE) code other than "NA." Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administration Separations) states a member of a Reserve component (RC) who is not on active duty or who is serving under a call or order to active duty for 180 days or less begins entry-level status upon enlistment in an RC. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Entry-level status for such a member of an RC terminates as follows: (1) 180 days after beginning training if the member is ordered to active duty for training (ADT) for one continuous period of 180 days or more; or (b) 90 days after the beginning of the second period of ADT if the member is ordered to ADT under a program that splits the training into two or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070013838 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. She entered initial active duty training (IADT) on 14 October 1988 and was relieved from IADT on 4 March 1989 after completing 4 months and 21 days of active service. Department of Defense Directive 1332.14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017959

    Original file (20080017959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records do not contain any documentation which shows that the applicant was seen by medical authorities or was recommended to appear before medical board for any medical problems while he was on active duty. Item 12b (Separation Date this Period) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was separated from active duty on 29 June 1988. The evidence of record shows that his characterization of service he was given was correct.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003836

    Original file (AR20130003836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: U.S. Army Human Resources Command orders D-05-516471, dated 10 May 2005, showing the applicant was discharged from the USAR effective 10 May 2005 with a characterization of honorable. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 149, copy of DA Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 10 May 2005, and copy of DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. In the case of a USAR Soldier on active duty (AD)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003179

    Original file (20110003179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to amend item 24 (Character of Service) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." It specifies that "Soldiers of the USAR ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from active duty, revert to control of the appropriate RC" and that the "service of Soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in an entry-level status will be uncharacterized,...