Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001360
Original file (20140001360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001360 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to be awarded the Air Medal.  As a new issue, he requests that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with “V” Device.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he believes that he should have been awarded the Air Medal and BSM with “V” Device because another member with whom he served received those awards.  He believes his paperwork was lost.

3.  The applicant provides a two-page letter from his former platoon leader in Vietnam and copies of orders awarding the other member of his unit the Air Medal and BSM with “V” Device. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant’s previous request for award of the Air Medal was considered and denied by the ABCMR on 8 January 2013 primarily because there were no flight records in his official file.  Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth procedures for processing requests for correction of military records.  Paragraph 2-15b governs requests for reconsideration.  This provision of the regulation allows an applicant to request reconsideration of an earlier ABCMR decision if the request is received within one year of the ABCMR's original decision and it has not previously been reconsidered.  The applicant’s current request was received by the Board on 13 January 2014.  Accordingly, it will not be considered or discussed further in these proceedings.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on
13 September 1967.  He completed his training as an infantryman and was transferred to Vietnam for assignment to Company D, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment.  The applicant was wounded on 25 May and 28 June 1968 and was medically evacuated from Vietnam.

4.  On 12 September 1969, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD).  He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 as amended shows that he was awarded the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device
* Purple Heart wit 1 oak leave cluster
* Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation

5.  The applicant has not provided and the available records do not contain any evidence showing that he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device.

6.  The statement from his platoon leader indicates that the applicant should have been awarded the BSM with “V” Device and the Air Medal.

7.   Title 10 U.S. Code, section 1130 provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.

8.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been carefully considered.

2.  Although the applicant has provided a statement from his former platoon leader indicating that the applicant deserves the awards he is seeking, there is insufficient evidence to grant his request for those awards.

3.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant a BSM, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the BSM with ”V” Device (or the Air Medal) by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 130.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x_____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001360





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001360



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025112

    Original file (20110025112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He thinks he should be awarded the BSM for the time he served as a platoon sergeant in Vietnam in 1969 * During the time he was assigned to the 1st Cavalry Division, all the platoon sergeants were awarded the BSM unless they got into disciplinary trouble * He knows he would have been put in for the award if the company commander and the first sergeant were not severely wounded at exactly the same time he was * His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces for the United States Report...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063195C070421

    Original file (2001063195C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the FSM’s separation document does not show he was awarded the Silver Star or the Purple Heart for his actions at Kham Duc (Vietnam) from 12 - 14 May 1969. The record contains no evidence showing that the FSM was awarded the Silver Star or the Purple Heart. These witnesses state that the FSM was wounded in action at Kham Duc.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016624

    Original file (20130016624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the applicant's official records failed to show any evidence suggesting his award of the BSM for meritorious service should be changed to an award for valor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099980C070208

    Original file (2004099980C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the Military Awards Branch advised the Member of Congress by letter, dated 16 May 1997, that the Army Decorations Board, acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Army, had determined the degree of heroism for award of the Silver Star did not merit approval of award of the Distinguished Service Cross or the Medal of Honor. [Soldier's name omitted] distinguished himself while serving as commanding officer, Company D, on a reconnaissance-in-force mission against enemy forces near...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020063

    Original file (20130020063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s record shows that he was clearly cited for his heroism when he distinguished himself by valorous action on 1 November 1965 in connection with military operations against an enemy of the United States in the RVN. Based upon the available evidence it is determined that the BSM with “V” Device was the appropriate award for the cited action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000559

    Original file (20130000559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 September 2004, the applicant's company commander (CO) submitted a DA Form 638 to the battalion commander recommending the applicant for award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device for his actions on 18 September 2004. Army Regulation 600-8-22, table 3-2 (Steps for preparing and processing awards using the DA Form 638) states, in part: a. The evidence of record does not show and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows the appropriate approving authority did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021553

    Original file (20120021553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110003409 on 13 October 2011. In his previous application to the Board he provided a copy of General Orders Number 5997 issued by Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division on 27 June 1968 awarding the BSM to the applicant for meritorious achievement on 1 February 1968. During the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012378

    Original file (20090012378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a self-authored statement, dated 17 July 2009; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) for the BSM, dated 4 April 2005, and citation; a commander's statement, dated 8 April 2005; two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statements); an ARCOM with Valor certificate, dated 15 August 2005; and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his application. There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant or anyone in his chain of command...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010976

    Original file (20140010976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. the following awards and their addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); * Silver Star * Bronze Star Medal with V Device * Purple Heart * Air Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge b. and that he be provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214). He is submitting evidence/documents from his former chain of command and platoon members for the recommendations and testimony for him to be awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000744

    Original file (20080000744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that on the date of action for his award of the BSM with "V" Device his platoon sergeant approached him and asked him if he would be willing to take award of the BSM with "V" Device vice the SS because too many had already been awarded. He further states that he now requests that his BSM with "V" Device for his service on 14 April 1970 be upgraded to the SS. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of...