Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001317
Original file (20140001317.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  2 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001317 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his date of birth (DOB) as 18 February 1957 and to reflect that his spouse is the beneficiary of his Life Insurance or any other benefits that he has obtained. 

2.  The applicant states his DOB is incorrectly shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his birth certificate and marriage license. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  He enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 20 January 1977.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 13 March 1977 and was released from ADT on 18 June 1977.  Item 4 (Date of Birth) of his DD Form 214 shows his DOB as 2 February 1957.

3.  A review of his personnel records found that his DOB is shown as 
18 February 1957 on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) and his Standard Form 601 (Immunization Record).

4.  He submits a copy of his birth certificate showing his date of birth as 
18 February 1957 and his marriage certificate which shows his date of marriage as 12 September 1981.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, states that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  There is no provision to list a Soldier's marital status or the beneficiary for his life insurance on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His DOB appears as 18 February 1957 on his Immunization Record and Personnel Qualification Record.  These forms are accepted as sufficient to correct his DD Form 214 to show his DOB as it is listed on his birth certificate.

2.  In regard to correcting his record to show he was married and to list his spouse as his beneficiary, there was no requirement at the time to list a Soldier's marital status on the DD Form 214.  Any request to update the beneficiary of his life insurance must be done with the issuer of such policy.  This portion of his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  __X______  ___X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show this date of birth as stated on his birth certificate.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was married at the time of his release from active duty training and that his spouse was the beneficiary of his life insurance.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001317





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001317



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015823

    Original file (20140015823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    h. DFAS letter to the applicant, dated 4 June 2014 (Exhibit L), that notified him of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay account based on documentation received from him. However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant notified DFAS concerning an error in his SBP coverage from the time that he retired from the U.S. Army on 25 March 2009 through May 2014. On 4 June 2014, DFAS notified the applicant of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062240C070421

    Original file (2001062240C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM's military records show: Furthermore, at the time of their divorce, RCSBP had not yet been established.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011503

    Original file (20140011503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. Although the applicant's DOB is shown in the SBP section of the FSM's Retiree Account Statement, there is no evidence of record that shows the FSM changed his SBP category from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage. There is also no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003244

    Original file (20120003244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * she and the FSM were never divorced * the FSM's Certificate of Death erroneously shows the entry "Divorced" * the FSM accumulated more than 20 years of qualifying service for retirement * she was refused assistance and barred from applying for RCSBP * the FSM should have received a notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter) * had the FSM lived to the age of 60 he would have elected spouse RCSBP full coverage * she has not received any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000357

    Original file (20100000357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 27 January 1957. The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 4 November 1961. The evidence of record shows the applicant remarried and his second spouse (C_____ A. Y____) became eligible for the spouse SBP coverage, as SBP coverage is governed by category; however, they also later divorced There is no evidence of record to show the applicant took any action to request a change to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008545

    Original file (20120008545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 13 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120008545 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides an 18 October 1989 court document showing separation from Pamela, a 14 August 2003 court document showing an uncontested termination of marriage from Susan, a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter), a 13 November 2002 RCSBP election form, a 29 February 2004 marriage certificate to Anna, and a 12 April 2012 RCSBP election form. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017958

    Original file (20110017958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * correction of her deceased husband's DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data) and SGLV Form 8286 (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) Election and Certificate), dated 23 February 2010, to show the beneficiary designations as they were prior to 23 February 2010 * paying the death gratuity and SGLI to the applicant * recouping the already-paid death gratuity from his mother 2. c. A letter written to the applicant from the Secretary of the Army, dated 4 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007746

    Original file (20120007746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she has two additional pieces of information that were not considered in the Board's previous decision: (1) the FSM's Retiree Account Statement (RAS), dated 2 December 2008, showing the FSM's spouse's date of birth (DOB) as 29 March 1957 which is her DOB and (2) the FSM married his new spouse in late August 2009 and he died on 22 July 2010 before he had been married 1 year which makes his new spouse ineligible for SBP benefits. There is nothing in the marital...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018015

    Original file (20140018015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided the FSM's DD Form 2656, dated 17 May 2003, showing the FSM elected former spouse coverage. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS, dated 16 June 2014, which states: * she was not entitled to receive an annuity under SBP * the FSM elected to cover her under SBP upon his retirement * a spouse loses eligibility as a spouse beneficiary upon divorce * retirees have the option to change their spouse coverage to former spouse coverage upon divorce, but the request from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021011

    Original file (20120021011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Finance and Accounting System (DFAS) provided a copy of a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 28 December 1994, which shows in Section II (Marital/Dependency Status) the applicant indicated he was married and had dependent children and elected SBP coverage for "children only," Option C (Immediate Coverage). DFAS also provided a copy of a DD Form 2656, dated 28 July 2011, wherein the applicant listed his status as "married" with no dependent children. In Section XI...