Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062240C070421
Original file (2001062240C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 29 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001062240

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Judy Blanchard-Miller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. John P. Infante Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that she be determined to be the legal spouse and beneficiary of the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). She further requests, that all of the FSM’s records be corrected to show that she was the legal spouse at the time of his death and that she is entitled to whatever benefits that have accrued since his death, including service benefits and life insurance.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the FSM’s death certificate incorrectly shows A_B as his spouse. The applicant states, in effect, that the woman named on the FSM’s death certificate is not his spouse because their divorce was never finalized. She believes that her marriage to the FSM is still legal even though they were not living together at the time of his death. The applicant states, that they kept in contact with each other over the years.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

He was born on 31 January 1935. He enlisted in the U.S. Navy on 11 March 1953. On 2 February 1957, he and the applicant were married. On 7 March 1957, after serving 3 years, 11 months and 27 days of active military service, the FSM was discharged and transferred to the Reserve.

On 11 November 1972, the FSM married A_B, in Tijuana, Mexico. The records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), show that the applicant petitioned for a divorce on or about 26 October 1973 and their divorce was not final until on or about 28 December 1973.

On 22 January 1977, after 9 years, 8 months and 27 days of inactive military service, the FSM enlisted in the Army National Guard. On 18 May 1985, the FSM received notification of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter).

On 23 June 1985, the FSM completed a DD Form 1883; electing to enroll in RCSBP, for spouse and children coverage, option C, full base amount. On the DD Form 1883, Section III, item 10, shows A_B, as the spouse.

The FSM died on 7 August 1999 of a cardiac arrhythmia. The death certificate shows, A_B, as the surviving spouse. She is also receiving the SBP annuity.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three option are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.

Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities governing the granting of “retired pay” to soldiers and former Reserve components soldiers. It explains that retired pay is pay granted to soldiers and former Reserve component soldiers who have completed 20 or more years of qualifying service and have attained age 60. Orders will be issued announcing the effective date eligible persons are entitled to retired pay. Chapter 3 describes the RCSBP. It clearly states that members who receive their 20-year letter have 90 days to elect to participate in the RCSBP and return the DD Form 1883. Should they fail to do so, they may subsequently elect coverage under the SBP with their application for retired pay upon reaching age 60.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The contentions of the applicant have been noted by the Board. However, they are not supported by either evidence submitted with the application or evidence of record. Although there may be some confusion surrounding the FSM’s second marriage, this Board will make no determination about the surviving spouse’s marital status. However, the evidence of record does show that the applicant petitioned for a divorce in October 1973 and the divorce apparently became final in December of the same year. When the divorce became final, the applicant was no longer his legal spouse and therefore not qualified to be the lawful beneficiary of RCSBP. Furthermore, at the time of their divorce, RCSBP had not yet been established.

3. There is also no evidence to show that it was ever the FSM’s intent to provide former spouse coverage for the applicant. In any event, former spouse coverage also had not yet been established when they divorced.

4. The evidence of record, however, does show that the FSM remarried and after receiving his 20-year letter, elected RCSBP for spouse and children in June 1985. After the FSM’s death, A_B was listed as the surviving spouse and was determined to be the lawful beneficiary of the FSM’s RCSBP. A_B is currently drawing the RCSBP annuity.

5. Therefore, this Board will not take any action to prevent the lawful beneficiary from receiving those benefits. To grant the applicant’s request at this date would constitute an unconstitutional taking without due process of law.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rvo___ __jpi___ __wdp___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001062240
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011129
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017536

    Original file (20130017536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The applicant contends that the FSM's records should be corrected to show his SBP election was changed from spouse to former spouse coverage because the divorce judgment required the FSM to maintain SBP with former spouse coverage for the applicant. There is no evidence that the applicant notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017536

    Original file (20130017536 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The applicant contends that the FSM's records should be corrected to show his SBP election was changed from spouse to former spouse coverage because the divorce judgment required the FSM to maintain SBP with former spouse coverage for the applicant. There is no evidence that the applicant notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000928

    Original file (20110000928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The evidence of record shows that the FSM executed a DD Form 1883 on 19 August 1979, electing "spouse and children" RCSBP coverage under option C, immediate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706023C070209

    Original file (9706023C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 May 1980, the U.S. Army Reserves notified him he had met eligibility requirements for retirement at age 60. On 16 May 1980, the FSM completed DD Form 1883, SBP Election Certificate, electing coverage of spouse only, option C (immediate coverage should he die before age 60) under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706023

    Original file (9706023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 May 1980, the U.S. Army Reserves notified him he had met eligibility requirements for retirement at age 60. On 11 November 1982, the FSM and the applicant were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009283

    Original file (20140009283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's records show he was born on 16 January 1944. According to the FSM's Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) pay records: * the FSM never changed his election to former spouse, but the applicant remained his beneficiary on his pay records * a deemed election was never submitted by the applicant * there is no indication the FSM remarried * the FSM continued to pay SBP premiums until the date of his death * no one is currently claiming his SBP annuity 14. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028722

    Original file (20100028722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides one of the FSM's Retiree Account Statements with an effective date of 5 December 2005. The statement shows the FSM elected spouse-only SBP coverage and shows his spouse's DOB as 27 September 1948. It would be appropriate to correct his DFAS records to show he elected former spouse coverage and option B under the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012822

    Original file (20060012822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM divorced M___ E___ in 1982. MEMBER NEVER CANCELED HIS SBP ELECTION AFTER HIS DIVORCE. The evidence of record shows he was not married to the applicant at the time of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005696

    Original file (20110005696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and FSM divorced in 1997. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are: a. if the service member voluntarily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016263C071029

    Original file (20060016263C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides their divorce decree; the FSM’s DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); the FSM’s DD Form 2656, and the FSM’s obituary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Notwithstanding his widow informing the Board analyst that she was actively...