IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 26 August 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140001193
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to a general discharge.
2. The applicant states his "discharge" states it was under other than honorable condition; however, it was upgraded for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) purposes.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 May 1976. He completed training as a medical specialist.
3. The applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three separate occasions between 19 May 1978 and 20 November 1978 for the following offenses:
* Destroying a window at Storck Barracks by throwing an object through the window
* Failure to go to his appointed place of duty (two specifications)
* Sleeping on duty as charge of quarters runner
* Appearing at Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry in an unserviceable fatigue uniform
* Disobeying a lawful order from his superior noncommissioned officer (two specifications)
4. On 24 January 1979, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of the following offenses:
* Failure to go to his appointed place of duty (two specifications)
* Disobeying a lawful order from his superior commissioned officer
* Being drunk while on duty as charge of quarters runner
5. The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not available. His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 12 April 1979, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-33b, due to misconduct.
6. There is no evidence the applicant ever petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions (a pattern of misconduct consisting solely of minor military disciplinary infractions), a pattern of misconduct (consisting of discreditable involvement with civil or military authorities or conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline), commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
b. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
c. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions have been noted and his supporting evidence has been considered.
2. His records show he accepted NJP on at least three separate occasions and he was convicted by a summary court-martial as a result of his numerous offenses. In the absence of evidence to the contrary and considering the nature of his offenses, it is presumed the type of discharge he received properly reflects his overall record of service.
3. The applicant has not shown error or injustice in the action taken by the Army in his case. There is no evidence in his record showing that this discharge was ever upgraded as he contends.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ____x___ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140001193
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140001193
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011127
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018024
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. His service record does shows he served honorably during his first enlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011639
On 30 August 1979, the applicant was advised by his unit commander that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 14 for misconduct. The commander cited as the specific reasons for the discharge action the applicant's five nonjudicial punishments which contained numerous charges and specifications that demonstrated a pattern of gross misconduct. There is no evidence showing he applied to the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022022
On 21 August 1979, the applicant's company commander recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 14-33b(1), for misconduct. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence of any medical condition that would have warranted consideration by a medical board under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001432
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070001432 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. These orders further show that the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011197C070208
Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. At 2030 hours, 22 March 1980, he jumped out a second story window while in an intoxicated state. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068648C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 3 August 1977, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being absent from his place of duty. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 3 months, a forfeiture of pay and a BCD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010365
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 11 August 1980, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, as a result of a court-martial with a BCD. The evidence of record confirms the applicants SPCM proceedings where he was convicted on several charges were accomplished in accordance with applicable law and regulation including a review through the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008790
On 27 March 1981, the unit commander notified the applicant he was initiating action to separate him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-33, for misconduct frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. He further acknowledged he understood if he received a character of service that was less than honorable he could make an application to the Army Discharge Review Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002776
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002776 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant was convicted by a general court-martial and was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge. His discharge was affirmed and he was discharged accordingly on 3 June 1980.