Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001183
Original file (20140001183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:  21 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001183 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal.

2.  He states that he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal in May 1992 at Fort Sill, OK.  He does not have copies of the award orders.  He had an outstanding career and now needs assistance in getting the award posted to his records.  His former platoon leader and company commander were supposed to write letters of support for him, but he has not yet received them.  He provides their names and phone numbers and asks the Board to call them.

3.  He provides a photograph of himself.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to 
timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in 1977.

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) does not list the Meritorious Service Medal among his authorized awards.

4.  He retired as a sergeant first class effective 31 May 1992.  His DD Form 214 does not list the Meritorious Service Medal among his authorized awards.

5.  His record is void of any orders showing he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Meritorious Service Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions regarding an applicant’s request for the correction of a military record.  In pertinent part, it states the Board will decide cases on the evidence of record.  It is not an investigative body.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Unfortunately, the applicant’s record is void of any orders showing he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal.  

2.  As this Board is not an investigative agency, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief at this time.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X__ __  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014400



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001183



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006848

    Original file (20090006848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his detachment commander told him that he would be awarded the Good Conduct Medal and either an Army Achievement Medal or an Army Commendation Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to Soldiers who distinguishes himself or herself from among his or her fellow Soldiers by their exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000650

    Original file (20100000650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Army Commendation Medal, and that he completed high school. The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 November 1975. Notwithstanding the letter provided by the applicant, there is no available evidence and the applicant has provided none to show he completed high school prior to his release from the service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003885

    Original file (20130003885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 March 1992, the applicant petitioned the ABCMR requesting correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect all of his military occupational specialties, military awards, and military education. On 27 March 1996, in response to his petition, the Board granted him partial relief by adding his military education and marksmanship badge to his DD Form 214, but denying the portion of his application pertaining to adding the Army Achievement Medal to his DD Form 214 due to the lack of orders. There...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000748

    Original file (20150000748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal. An Army Commendation Medal Certificate, dated 3 February 1969, wherein it shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in Vietnam during the period February 1968 to January 1969. b. Regrettably, in the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002695

    Original file (20150002695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal. His record is void of orders showing he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal. The evidence is insufficient to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018415

    Original file (20090018415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a second award of the Army Commendation Medal (correctly known as the Army Commendation Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster). Since the applicant's DD Form 214 was corrected to show his service in Southwest Asia (i.e., combat service), this portion of the applicant's request will not be discussed further in these proceedings. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011203

    Original file (20130011203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, transfer of his summary court-martial proceedings to the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (currently known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR)). A review of his AMHRR in the Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) shows that the summary court-martial and all allied documents are filed in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021121

    Original file (20120021121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following awards: * two Army Achievement Medals * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal 2. Acceptance of the NATO Medal has been approved for U.S. military personnel who serve under NATO command or operational control in direct support of NATO operations in the former Republic of Yugoslavia from 1 July 1992 through a date to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005934

    Original file (20120005934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal upon retirement but the award is not listed on his DD Form 214. His record is void of any orders showing he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal. The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009339

    Original file (20090009339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show four awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal, and any new medals related to his service in Southwest Asia. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Army Achievement Medal. Therefore, lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified the applicant, it would be appropriate to award him the...