Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011203
Original file (20130011203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  27 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011203 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, transfer of his summary court-martial proceedings to the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (currently known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR)).

2.  The applicant states his court-martial was imposed in 2007 for a mistake he made while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 2006 to 2008.  At the time, he was assigned to the 1st Air Cavalry Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division in the grade specialist/E-4.  He regrets his error and would like the opportunity to advance in his career as a noncommissioned officer.  He has completed his punishment and has progressed since his mistake.

3.  The applicant provides his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), numerous awards, certificates of achievement, and training certificates.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 August 2005.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 88N (Transportation Management Coordinator) and is currently a staff sergeant serving in Korea.

2.  His AMHRR contains numerous documents related to his summary court-martial to include a DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 10 October 2007, which shows that while he was assigned to Camp Taji, Iraq, he was charged with violating General Order Number One by consuming alcohol on 4 October 2007.

3.  A DD Form 2329 (Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial), dated 
27 October 2005, shows he was charged with and found guilty of violating Article 92, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for disobeying a lawful general order by consuming alcohol in a deployed environment.  A review of his AMHRR in the Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) shows that the summary court-martial and all allied documents are filed in the Performance folder of this file. 

4.  The applicantÂ’s record contains numerous awards and decorations which include, but are not limited to the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award), Valorous Unit Award, Meritorious Unit Commendation, Drivers Badge with Wheeled Component Bar, and the Iraq Campaign Medal.  His record also contains several Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports received during the period beginning October 2009 through January 2013.  These reports show he was rated as "among the best" for overall potential for promotion and/or service in positions of greater responsibility and the comments support these ratings.  In addition, his senior raters found that his overall performance and potential for promotion merited both "successful" and "superior" ratings respectively. 

5.  Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) sets forth policies and procedures to authorize placement of unfavorable information about Army members in individual official personnel files; ensure that unfavorable information that is unsubstantiated, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete is not filed in individual official personnel files; and ensure that the best interests of both the Army and the Soldier are served by authorizing unfavorable information to be placed in and, when appropriate, removed from official personnel files.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resource Records Management) prescribes Army policy for the creation, utilization, administration, maintenance, and disposition of the AMHRR.  Appendix B, Table B-1 lists the documents which have been approved by Department of the Army for filing in the AMHRR and/or iPERMS.  It states, in part, to file summary court-martial orders in the "Performance" folder when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification.  If all approved findings are not guilty, file the order in the "Restricted" folder.  If all charges and specifications are later dismissed or if all findings of guilty have been reversed in a supplemental order, remove all related orders from the "Performance" folder and transfer them to the "Restricted" folder.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his summary court-martial record be transferred to the restricted portion of his AMHRR.

2.  His awards and evaluations speak highly of the applicantÂ’s performance of duty and potential for continued service in positions of increased responsibility.

3.  However, evidence confirms he was convicted by a summary court-martial of violating Article 92 of the UCMJ.  By regulation, court-martial orders will be filed in the performance portion of the AMHRR when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification.  The regulation states only if all charges and specifications are later dismissed or if all findings of guilty have been reversed in a supplemental order, remove all related orders from the "Performance" folder and transfer them to the "Restricted" folder.  

4.  He has not provided any evidence and his record is void of any documentation showing the charge was reversed or dismissed.  As such, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011203





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011203



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016160

    Original file (20140016160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests a summary court-martial from a different service (U.S. Marine Corps (USMC)) be removed from the performance folder of his official military personnel file (OMPF) or transferred to the restricted folder. An NAVMC Form 118(13), dated 17 July 1996, shows he was convicted by a summary court-martial of unauthorized absence and was sentenced to a forfeiture of pay for one month and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018028

    Original file (20140018028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued for this period of service shows the effective date of his promotion to CPL as 1 June 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * moving the DD Form 369, dated 6 January 2009, and the attached page 11 of NAVMC Form 118(13) from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005693

    Original file (20140005693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's AMHRR only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. Since there was an approved finding of guilty of at least one specification, as required by the regulation, the court-martial document was filed in the performance folder of his AMHRR. The AMHRR serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005914

    Original file (20120005914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a summary court-martial that he received in 1967 from his Army records. The available records do not contain a DD Form 2329 (Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial). ________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000943

    Original file (20150000943.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to transfer or remove General Court-Martial (GCM) Order Number 91, dated 28 March 2003, from the performance section to the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF) and a new request for promotion reconsideration by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3)/W-3. He is not asking the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to disturb the finality of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022809

    Original file (20120022809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120022809 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 26 November 2012, the DASEB informed the applicant it did not have the authority to act on his request for removal of General Court-Martial Order Number 14 from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). The regulation also shows that if all charges and specifications of a court-martial order are later dismissed or if all findings of guilty have been reversed in a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017665

    Original file (20130017665.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 13 February 2007, belonging to another Soldier from his records located on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) * removal of two DA Forms 2627, dated 20 January 2007 and 13 August 2007, from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * in the alternative, transfer of the Article 15 filed in the performance folder...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013854

    Original file (20120013854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his DD Form 2329 (Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial) to the restricted portion of his Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR). The applicant provides a letter of recommendation from his immediate commander to transfer the DD Form 2329 to the applicant's restricted portion of the AMHRR. Depending on the purpose, documents will be filed in the AMHRR in one of three sections: performance, service, or restricted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019823

    Original file (20130019823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019823 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of General Court-Martial (GCM) Order Number 5, dated 19 August 2010, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant was convicted by a GCM on 13 March 2010 for adultery and found not guilty of two specifications of rape and sexual assault.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014282

    Original file (20130014282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) imposed on 7 April 1990 from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) and b. reversal of the reduction in rank imposed as nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 7 April 1990 in the DA Form 2627. The applicant states: a. The evidence shows he was promoted to SFC/E-7 in the NMARNG in August 1982 and he...